C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Should I try Royal Purple oil???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-13-2008, 01:48 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
///AMG4EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLS55 Designo 030
This is one of the things I'm afraid to touch. I'm sticking to Mobil 1 0W-40.
Old 08-13-2008, 02:42 PM
  #27  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally Posted by c32used
Can you post a link please I am interested and is it 5W40? That about $6.33 each
it's 0w-40. search online there should be couple places to buy'em. I bought'em locally.
Old 08-13-2008, 04:43 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,799
Received 239 Likes on 185 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
Originally Posted by c32used
Can you post a link please I am interested and is it 5W40? That about $6.33 each.
5W-30...here is the link; it appears they have raised the price to $84 per case, shipped. Still, that is an even $7 per quart. For what it does, not a bad deal.

http://www.clubrsx.com/cr/RP-1C.html

It lists all the weights they offer RP Synthetic in:

5W20, 5W30, 10W30, 10W40, 15W40, 20W50
Old 08-13-2008, 05:09 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
trbo2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 1,140
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2004 C32, 2006 Honda CBR1000RR, 2007 Harley NightRod, 2013 Harley Road Glide Custom
Originally Posted by c32used
I want to personally thank you guys for your input thus far...I am still kind of confused but still leaning more to the cheaper Mobil1 which my local MB dealer said 5W40 is the current version used for MBs instead of 0W40...but I may try RP once to see if engine runs smoother not for the HP claims.
Who can educate me on the differences of what I'm using 0w40 vs what you're saying the dealer switched (5w40) to? Why did they switch?
Old 08-13-2008, 05:16 PM
  #30  
Super Member
 
lkfoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & Cayucos CA
Posts: 770
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
'19 AMG E53 Cpe, '23 EQS 580 SUV, '88 560SL, '35 Ford 5w coupe, '53 MGTD and others
Originally Posted by MRAMG1
Gentlemen:

The BIG debate is/was that Mobil 1 reduced their phosphorous levels, in PPM. Note: This was a US LAW requirement so ALL oils sold in the US now have this reduced phosphorous level due to the requirment of Catalitic convertors clogging on HIGH levels. Anyway, ALL oils have been reduced that are sold in the US. Run whatever synthetic you like, I have been using Mobil 1 for over 20 years now, and my ex crew chief worked at a local research comapany, OIL research that is. After all his tests, Mobil 1 was JUST as good, or better than ALL the other brands. Did I mention that it is ALOT cheaper

Oh yeah, some other brands were a tad better in high temperature breakdown issues, however we are talking about 5 degrees here. REAL world results NO DIFFERENCE, IE 535 vs 540 farenheit.

Oh well, I will be staying with Mobil 1, suit yourself, after all its your money.

See yeah
+1

I've run Mobil 1 for 20 years and something like a 400,000 total miles without a single oil-related problem. When I did the timing chain on my M5, a more highly tuned engine than a big lazy AMG C55 V-8, it looked virtually brand new up top and in the crankcase at 165,000 miles.
Old 08-13-2008, 05:18 PM
  #31  
Super Member
 
lkfoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & Cayucos CA
Posts: 770
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
'19 AMG E53 Cpe, '23 EQS 580 SUV, '88 560SL, '35 Ford 5w coupe, '53 MGTD and others
Originally Posted by trbo2nr
Who can educate me on the differences of what I'm using 0w40 vs what you're saying the dealer switched (5w40) to? Why did they switch?
For me the biggest difference is that if I frag the motor on my CPO car I don't have to worry about proving to MB that a non-approved weight or type of oil didn't cause it.
Old 08-13-2008, 09:28 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
Guys I use RP with NO PROBLEMS on my C55. You need to look at sm and sl rated oils. If you look mobile still has the good stuff but its bottled under 40W diesel app. I used Rp and have no ticking at all. With mobile1 I had a ticking at idle. Please read up on this.
Old 08-13-2008, 09:47 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ohlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,171
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
300E a couple 1994 w124wagon E320 Wagon/,1971MGB Track/Rally, MG Midget Autocross ,2000 E320 wagon.
When

you gall a cam or spin a bearing then tell us about you had no problems with the RP in your c55,better yet like I always say have the nads to put in the ad when you sell the car someday. That you always maintained it with non spec,non mb rated non 229.5 non approved oil.I always look over the ads when searching out cars for forum members and it is funny how when it comes to maintaining mb's the owners all seem to have used factory spec mobil1 0w40 even though members like you don't and think that's okay.If your engine was ticking it was not the mobil 1 that did it,it was poor maintenance.
So please come selling day tell everyone up front what oil you used,that way they can make an informed decision whether to purchase your car or not.


do you see RP?
http://www.whnet.com/4x4/oil.html
if you call them they will tell you it is not approved 229.3 or 229.5
and you trust that jewel of an engine to it?
I bet you run k/n filters and a sprintbooster also.

Last edited by ohlord; 08-13-2008 at 09:55 PM.
Old 08-13-2008, 10:15 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,799
Received 239 Likes on 185 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
Originally Posted by ohlord
Do you see RP...
AMSOIL is not on that list either, and it has been independently verified as the best synthetic for overall wear protection. Just curious as to what is wrong with either K&N filters or the Sprint Booster? The filters offer superior air flow, and yes I am full aware of the MAF issues, which are caused not by the filters themselves but instead by the owners over oiling them after 50K miles. The Sprint Booster is a bad choice because it improves throttle response and virtually eliminates the downshift delay? C'mon my friend, just because it isn't "MB approved" does not in any way automatically mean the product itself is detrimental. In all fairness, there is a ton of garbage out there...but some exceptional products exist as well.
Old 08-13-2008, 11:20 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lkfoster
For me the biggest difference is that if I frag the motor on my CPO car I don't have to worry about proving to MB that a non-approved weight or type of oil didn't cause it.
The new 5w-40 is Mobil 1 Formula M (For Mercedes) ESP (Exhaust System Protection), it is a 229.51 oil, that last "1" indicating that it is for diesel engines with exhaust treatment systems. Any oil that is 229.X1 is a diesel-engine oil.

The 0W-40 Mobil 1 meets 229.5, the latest gasoline-spec oil, and it is one of very few (perhaps the only) 229.5 oil approved for AMG. 229.X oils are gasoline rated (vs.above.)

I have done a lot of research on motor oil, and have considered switching to RedLine and RP many times, but the fact remains that they do not meet any MB spec. If these companies do not care to meet the standard or apply for the rating, they do not deserve my business, not to mention, it would void any warranty.
Old 08-15-2008, 01:43 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
Please know what you are doing before making comments

You forgot that I have BBS wheels and coilovers too
Before you make comments such as the ones you make please read up on the matter.


The reason why mobil reformulated thier oils is to spare the cats on our cars the bad side it will toast your motor over time. you see the new oils have less phosphorus along with a bunch of vital components needs to keep things in check.
Old 08-15-2008, 01:53 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
READ CAREFULLY

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikegpr03
Stay away from 0 weight oils! these oil are SM rated oils!. The reason we went to this oil was the goverment and every tree hugger in california found out that if you reduced the sulfer and some other key stuff by 50% in the oil the car is more "efficient" at start up. However th oil is not as good as the SL rated oils. Things have gotten soooo bad with engine failers with this oil that the goverment has given all the heavy machinery companys (peterbuilt,detroit diesle) ect and extension on using sm rated oils till 2010 or until they figuere something out . Mobil has a (refomulated) oil which is crap its a sm oil! these oils are about 50% less effective at protecting your car and dont lasts as long. If you do go to this oil please change it every 4500 miles or so. Guys this is not the oil you used to think you had. I used royal purple 10w40 and it works great. If you want to stay with mobil then try the 10w40 diesle its still a sl rated oil.

So when i sell my car i will give them this to read.

guys read these
http://www.ttalk.info/Zddp.htm
http://www.sherbournemews.com/oil.pdf
Old 08-15-2008, 11:05 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
Old 08-16-2008, 12:13 AM
  #39  
Super Member
 
boohooramblers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 925
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not an AMG :(
Originally Posted by c32used
....there are conflicting info on all oils our car uses even Mobil1 so people with good or bad reasons for RP oils or any other please say so....
'Animal Farm' comes to mind here........."some pigs are more equal than others"

Clearly, there are oil formulations that are approved by MB and some that are not. Strategic business relationships between disparate companies often play an important role in what oils are 'recommended' by an auto manufacturer.

That said, oil formulations should be (and ARE) tested empirically by the likes of MB, etc.
The question to ask here should be directed to those who track/flog their cars and those who have significant mileage on their cars.
Of course, one variable not being addressed here is the frequency at which oil changes are performed. Another important thing to consider is that very few motor 'tear-downs' have been conducted (or at least they aren't reported on MBWorld!).

Assuming 'non-trackers' change their oil every 3-7K miles and 'trackers' change it more frequently, how are your motors holding up? Let's ask M112K owners with high mileage (e.g. 90+-150+K miles).

What does your oil look like when you change it? (Not particularly scientific, but color and odor are sometimes useful). Any evidence of aberrant metal particles?

Who goes to the trouble of analyzing waste oil upon changing? This is expensive and arguably not necessary; however, if I were going to switch to a brand of oil that were not necessarily 'recommended' by MBZ, I (personally) would analyze it for the first couple of changes.
Old 08-16-2008, 10:49 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
Thats a great write up
Old 08-16-2008, 11:26 AM
  #41  
Super Member
 
mkonei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Delran, NJ
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05 C55
Originally Posted by Mikegpr03
READ CAREFULLY

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikegpr03
Stay away from 0 weight oils! these oil are SM rated oils!. The reason we went to this oil was the goverment and every tree hugger in california found out that if you reduced the sulfer and some other key stuff by 50% in the oil the car is more "efficient" at start up. However th oil is not as good as the SL rated oils. Things have gotten soooo bad with engine failers with this oil that the goverment has given all the heavy machinery companys (peterbuilt,detroit diesle) ect and extension on using sm rated oils till 2010 or until they figuere something out . Mobil has a (refomulated) oil which is crap its a sm oil! these oils are about 50% less effective at protecting your car and dont lasts as long. If you do go to this oil please change it every 4500 miles or so. Guys this is not the oil you used to think you had. I used royal purple 10w40 and it works great. If you want to stay with mobil then try the 10w40 diesle its still a sl rated oil.

So when i sell my car i will give them this to read.

guys read these
http://www.ttalk.info/Zddp.htm
http://www.sherbournemews.com/oil.pdf
Standard diesel weight in the heavy truck business (classes 6-8) is 15/40. Formulation changed from CI-4 for a pre 2007 emissions compliant engine, to a CJ-4 for all vehicles manufactured as 2008 model year (2007 compliant). CJ-4 can go into older engines, but CI-4 can not go into newer engines. 2007 compliant engines (again 2008 model year and forward) are equipped with diesel particulate filters and regeneration systems to clean these filters. CJ-4 oil is formulated as a low ash oil to stop premature clogging of the particulate filter. customers using CI-4 formulation on an engine that requires CJ-4, will have normally warrantable claims denied. there is no "extension" to use the older formulated oils in newer engines, at least in the heavy side of diesels. (see below) i have customers that have hundreds of thousands of miles on the Cummins ISX running the CJ-4, and no oil related failures to date. yes i sell trucks...

http://www.dieselpowermag.com/news/0...ews/index.html
Old 08-18-2008, 04:00 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
[

I've run Mobil 1 for 20 years and something like a 400,000 total miles without a single oil-related problem. When I did the timing chain on my M5, a more highly tuned engine than a big lazy AMG C55 V-8, it looked virtually brand new up top and in the crankcase at 165,000 miles.[/QUOTE]

No one caught this slight to the C55. Define for me: "More highly tuned." Are you saying that the C55 engine is put out in a less tuned (i.e. lower state of tune?) than the M5?? Big Lazy C55 V-8??? Define for me a "Big Lazy engine??"
Old 08-18-2008, 04:52 PM
  #43  
Super Member
 
boohooramblers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 925
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not an AMG :(
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
......No one caught this slight to the C55. Define for me: "More highly tuned." Are you saying that the C55 engine is put out in a less tuned (i.e. lower state of tune?) than the M5?? Big Lazy C55 V-8??? Define for me a "Big Lazy engine??"
LOL!
Old 08-18-2008, 04:59 PM
  #44  
Super Member
 
DarkXerox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 E550, 02 C32, 91 300E
Originally Posted by Newzchspy

I've run Mobil 1 for 20 years and something like a 400,000 total miles without a single oil-related problem. When I did the timing chain on my M5, a more highly tuned engine than a big lazy AMG C55 V-8, it looked virtually brand new up top and in the crankcase at 165,000 miles.

No one caught this slight to the C55. Define for me: "More highly tuned." Are you saying that the C55 engine is put out in a less tuned (i.e. lower state of tune?) than the M5?? Big Lazy C55 V-8??? Define for me a "Big Lazy engine??"
Off topic but you could make the hp/liter argument, the 8250rpm redline argument, or the fact that V10 engines are unbalanced below 10k-ish rpm. But its also newer technology by a few years or so as well.
Old 08-18-2008, 07:30 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
Why don't we just pour some Royal Purple and forget about it
Old 08-18-2008, 07:42 PM
  #46  
Super Member
 
turbo16lbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1991 Toyota MR2, 2002 C32 AMG
This topic has been so many times. Just run a search. There will always be different opinions on this...
Old 08-18-2008, 10:03 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Question

What oil filter is preferred the best?
Old 08-18-2008, 11:24 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
I use original mb and I chang it 2 times for every oil change. I change my oil evey 5,000 miles..every 2,500 I swap it a new one.


Just my.2
Old 08-19-2008, 01:05 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
This sucks I just found out that the oil extractor I ordered from Harbor Freight is on backorder...Why can't the site say so when the order was placed I only got an invoice number and thats it. Anyone in the Chitown area has an oil extractor I can use once? I still have to buy the oil filter so I have time.
Old 08-19-2008, 01:21 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Watched the "Royal Purple Challenge" performed right in front of me ON A DYNO. Guy from Katech (GM modding place in Detroit) was on with a Caddy putting down 423whp. That was before Royal purple, they swapped out the oil and dyno'd it.......car lost 1hp.

After sitting around wondering what the heck happened we came to the conclusion that swapping synthetic to RP gains near nothing while I bet going from regular oil to Royal Purple gives the gains they brag about.

Pretty cool watching it happen right in front of you.

I would say no to on going Mobil 1 to RP.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Should I try Royal Purple oil???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.