machine down the code3 pulley smaller?
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
machine down the code3 pulley smaller?
Hi guys,
I was reading on the srt forums and i read about a guy that machined down his stock pulley to create more boost.
I would rather to machine down the sc pulley rather then overdrive my accessory pullies.
I was thinking of machining down the code pulley from 65mm down to 62mm..basically creating the same boost as a LET 185.
You think it would be ok or is 65mm the smallest the sc pulley can be safely run?
I was reading on the srt forums and i read about a guy that machined down his stock pulley to create more boost.
I would rather to machine down the sc pulley rather then overdrive my accessory pullies.
I was thinking of machining down the code pulley from 65mm down to 62mm..basically creating the same boost as a LET 185.
You think it would be ok or is 65mm the smallest the sc pulley can be safely run?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Hi guys,
I was reading on the srt forums and i read about a guy that machined down his stock pulley to create more boost.
I would rather to machine down the sc pulley rather then overdrive my accessory pullies.
I was thinking of machining down the code pulley from 65mm down to 62mm..basically creating the same boost as a LET 185.
You think it would be ok or is 65mm the smallest the sc pulley can be safely run?
I was reading on the srt forums and i read about a guy that machined down his stock pulley to create more boost.
I would rather to machine down the sc pulley rather then overdrive my accessory pullies.
I was thinking of machining down the code pulley from 65mm down to 62mm..basically creating the same boost as a LET 185.
You think it would be ok or is 65mm the smallest the sc pulley can be safely run?
Keep us posted though - interested to hear what your results are.
#3
Hi guys,
I was reading on the srt forums and i read about a guy that machined down his stock pulley to create more boost.
I would rather to machine down the sc pulley rather then overdrive my accessory pullies.
I was thinking of machining down the code pulley from 65mm down to 62mm..basically creating the same boost as a LET 185.
You think it would be ok or is 65mm the smallest the sc pulley can be safely run?
I was reading on the srt forums and i read about a guy that machined down his stock pulley to create more boost.
I would rather to machine down the sc pulley rather then overdrive my accessory pullies.
I was thinking of machining down the code pulley from 65mm down to 62mm..basically creating the same boost as a LET 185.
You think it would be ok or is 65mm the smallest the sc pulley can be safely run?
i dont see why you cant machine it down for more power, should work. the only problem is that belt slip may significantly increase and you may need to change the belt size.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
You would probably get lots of belt spin and besides code3 pulley is designed to run on our cars, to me you are taking risk and gains outweigh the loss ($800). Just my 2c.
Let's see what MRAMG will say
See Yeah!
lol
Let's see what MRAMG will say
See Yeah!
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
i bought my code3 pulley used for $450...so if i can machine it down to maybe $100 and get the power of a LET 185, i'll be happy.
I'm more worried about the structural integrity issues rather then belt slip.
The other issue is that i might need to switch to a higher rpm bearing? Kinda like the new LET vs old LET crank pullies?
#6
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
yeah, reading his post gave me the idea.
i bought my code3 pulley used for $450...so if i can machine it down to maybe $100 and get the power of a LET 185, i'll be happy.
I'm more worried about the structural integrity issues rather then belt slip.
The other issue is that i might need to switch to a higher rpm bearing? Kinda like the new LET vs old LET crank pullies?
i bought my code3 pulley used for $450...so if i can machine it down to maybe $100 and get the power of a LET 185, i'll be happy.
I'm more worried about the structural integrity issues rather then belt slip.
The other issue is that i might need to switch to a higher rpm bearing? Kinda like the new LET vs old LET crank pullies?
I was thinking the same thing today, except doing it on a 55k crank pulley to lower boost.
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
03 C32 gone, 06 CLS55, 16 Tesla X
I personally don't think bell slip will be a bigger problem compare to LET 185mm. Well the bell slip problem is always there, but to compare between the two: The LET's "super" smaller guide pulley will also create bigger angle. To sand down the supercharger pulley you also create a bigger bell angle. Which one is bigger? I am not sure. But I think LETs will probably be bigger (I may be wrong) so take my opinion at your own risk![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
The bigger the angle is the more bell slip occurs.
The point here is why do you want to sand down your code3? If I sand it down, I definitely sand the original pulley down![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
The idea is right but I think it may be too thin for the pulley. (Yes it's possible)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
The point here is why do you want to sand down your code3? If I sand it down, I definitely sand the original pulley down
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
The idea is right but I think it may be too thin for the pulley. (Yes it's possible)
#9
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
I can try and find out, the only thing kinda putting a damper on my plans is just that the damper on the stock pulley might be in the way. IT was just an idea I tossed around to the guys who are doing the install.
I tell you what If there is enough material still on the C3P SC pulley i would think you could machine it down....I would bet a skilled machinist could do it.
Something to think about though if you do run more boost then the C3P SC pulley you may run the risk of putting your supercharger out of its efficiency range.
With my case I'm not sure a stock crank pulley could be machined down enough to lower the boost to a safe level and still stay structurely sound.
I tell you what If there is enough material still on the C3P SC pulley i would think you could machine it down....I would bet a skilled machinist could do it.
Something to think about though if you do run more boost then the C3P SC pulley you may run the risk of putting your supercharger out of its efficiency range.
With my case I'm not sure a stock crank pulley could be machined down enough to lower the boost to a safe level and still stay structurely sound.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
I personally don't think bell slip will be a bigger problem compare to LET 185mm. Well the bell slip problem is always there, but to compare between the two: The LET's "super" smaller guide pulley will also create bigger angle. To sand down the supercharger pulley you also create a bigger bell angle. Which one is bigger? I am not sure. But I think LETs will probably be bigger (I may be wrong) so take my opinion at your own risk![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
The bigger the angle is the more bell slip occurs.
The point here is why do you want to sand down your code3? If I sand it down, I definitely sand the original pulley down![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
The idea is right but I think it may be too thin for the pulley. (Yes it's possible)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
The point here is why do you want to sand down your code3? If I sand it down, I definitely sand the original pulley down
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
The idea is right but I think it may be too thin for the pulley. (Yes it's possible)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
after talking to one of my ME friends. I'll probably just use the oem pulley since its already off and i dont really have to worry about structural integrity issues as much. i'll probably call a couple of machine shops tomorrow and see what kind of pricing i can get. My friend told me it might be a couple of hundred dollars, so i'll see where the pricing is before i continue with the project.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
after talking to one of my ME friends. I'll probably just use the oem pulley since its already off and i dont really have to worry about structural integrity issues as much. i'll probably call a couple of machine shops tomorrow and see what kind of pricing i can get. My friend told me it might be a couple of hundred dollars, so i'll see where the pricing is before i continue with the project.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Plus the oem pulley is probably built to a higher quality then the code3 and its already off the car. I can take the pulley and get opinions from experienced machinists on my project and see if its fesiable to machine down it down that low from there experience.
Everyone saids its doable from a theory stand point, i think this is one of the cases where talking with someone with experience can give further insight.
#14
is anyone selling a code 3 pulley by any chance and could someone possibly direct me to a forum that has oppinions on if these wear on your motor. I have a 2002 c32 with 75k and a lot left in loans on it so i dont want to mess up my car. Please let me know thanks guys
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
anyone thought about the fact that code3 decided on their size for a reason? is it possible that machining the pulley will overdrive the SC too much? i would think that they have done their research.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
the other site states the sc can go up to 20000rpm on the supercharger, which is in line with the other ihi superchargers i've seen on the net. But the fuel injectors and fuel pump will crap out way before that.
I machined the oem pulley down to 70mm from the 74mm. I might just do with a duel stack pulley setup with a 178 asp/evo and 70mm which would be slightly higher then the 185 LET setup.
I machined the oem pulley down to 70mm from the 74mm. I might just do with a duel stack pulley setup with a 178 asp/evo and 70mm which would be slightly higher then the 185 LET setup.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
well i got my pulley machined down for free. so it didnt really cost me anything. I'm debating whether i should try to machine down further
#19
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
considering the code3 pulley is at 65mm and i only have it down to 70mm. i got still got a lot of room. i'm debating whether i want to go with a duel pulley setup or not.
#22
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shreveport/BAFB
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Srt-6 Crossfire
the new Code3 mid pulley is 68mm. I'm seeing 15#'s almost instantly and 19-20#'s peak, with it and the ASP 178. Car runs strong and I hope to havve some new track times soon. There has been some talk of running the 65mm Code3 and 178 with possibly a wastgate to kepp boost at 22#'s and prevent overboost. Who will be the first to try it?
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
So i got my buddy to machine down the stock sc pulley to 70mm. I'm thinking of maybe going with a LET 185 and a 70mm sc pulley.
going off a forza's formula,
178/65 combo would push the supercharger to 16,430rpms
185/74 = 15000rpm
178/ mid code3 pulley 68 = 15705 rpm
I'm thinking maybe
185/70 = 15857 rpm
You guys think 15800rpm would be viable for the supercharger since we know at 16400, it makes the car run too lean.
going off a forza's formula,
178/65 combo would push the supercharger to 16,430rpms
185/74 = 15000rpm
178/ mid code3 pulley 68 = 15705 rpm
I'm thinking maybe
185/70 = 15857 rpm
You guys think 15800rpm would be viable for the supercharger since we know at 16400, it makes the car run too lean.