C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Ported Head flow numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 09-08-2009 | 08:33 PM
  #1  
stallion8797's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
Ported Head flow numbers

We just finished porting a set of heads for a N/A crossfire and since they are the same as the C32 heads I thought I'd share the results.

I'll try to get some pics up tomorrow, but here are the flow numbers.

Here are the flow numbers:

Stock:

.100" I:88.7 E:65.7
.200" I:167.5 E:118.6
.300" I:218.2 E:159.4
.400" I:217.8 E:177.6
.500" I:224.8 E:184.3

Modified:

.100" I:101.1 E:71.6
.200" I:195.3 E:117.8
.300" I:256.9 E:164.0
.400" I:296.0 E:192.3
.500" I:318.9 E:199.1

Gains:

.100" I:12.4 E:5.9
.200" I:27.8 E:-.8
.300" I:38.7 E:4.6
.400" I:78.2 E:14.7
.500" I:94.1 E:14.8
Old 09-08-2009 | 09:02 PM
  #2  
AirFrcd's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 618
Likes: 1
03 c32
Forgive my ignorance, can you pls elaborate on the datum that you posted in layman terms?
Old 09-08-2009 | 09:24 PM
  #3  
Gramma_Benz's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 20
From: East Bay, Bay Area
2002 C32, 2012 S550
Still not layman's terms. but here's the original thread:

http://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/crossfire-srt6/37364-head-work-done-216-318-cfm.html
Old 09-08-2009 | 09:56 PM
  #4  
stallion8797's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by AirFrcd
Forgive my ignorance, can you pls elaborate on the datum that you posted in layman terms?
Flow numbers are the amount of air at cubic feet per minute (cfm) flowed through the given valve at a specific lift (.x00"). The cam lobes are what give the lift or opening of the valves. Basically the idea is to maintain velocity and keep a good solid lift in the area where the cam is maximized. For these particular heads, the cam is happiest in the .350-.450, but it obvoiusly crosses both extremes.

The general rule for HP gain on a N/A motor is 2hp=1cfm. So if the motor itself can use the increased airflow (SC motors will benefit way more then the NA) then you could posssibly gain almost 200 HP from these heads. Realistically though it will depend on what your weak link is.

I would expect 50HP on the M112K with a modded motor. For the M112 I would expect 15-20HP. The limiting factor on these motors is the SC, so the heads will not really be able to shine until that bottle neck is taken care of. I have an extra SC sitting at the shop and I may just put it on the flow bench to see just how much it flows.
Old 09-08-2009 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
AirFrcd's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 618
Likes: 1
03 c32
Sent PM.
Old 09-08-2009 | 10:13 PM
  #6  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by stallion8797
Flow numbers are the amount of air at cubic feet per minute (cfm) flowed through the given valve at a specific lift (.x00"). The cam lobes are what give the lift or opening of the valves. Basically the idea is to maintain velocity and keep a good solid lift in the area where the cam is maximized. For these particular heads, the cam is happiest in the .350-.450, but it obvoiusly crosses both extremes.

The general rule for HP gain on a N/A motor is 2hp=1cfm. So if the motor itself can use the increased airflow (SC motors will benefit way more then the NA) then you could posssibly gain almost 200 HP from these heads. Realistically though it will depend on what your weak link is.

I would expect 50HP on the M112K with a modded motor. For the M112 I would expect 15-20HP. The limiting factor on these motors is the SC, so the heads will not really be able to shine until that bottle neck is taken care of. I have an extra SC sitting at the shop and I may just put it on the flow bench to see just how much it flows.
i believe Jerry did this on his C32 and didnt pick up power . and he has the most heavily modded C32 probably, though makes less power than Jake's

http://dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz-C...lip-15891.html

Last edited by jturkel; 09-08-2009 at 10:19 PM.
Old 09-08-2009 | 10:55 PM
  #7  
stallion8797's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jturkel
i believe Jerry did this on his C32 and didnt pick up power . and he has the most heavily modded C32 probably, though makes less power than Jake's

http://dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz-C...lip-15891.html
I believe at the time Jerry tested he didn't have any major modification to the intake side of the car though. If the stock manifolds only flow 190cfm, a head that flows 250cfm is only going to use 190cfm.

Every head porter is different. I've sen people lose power with improper porting and then with the same heads ported by someone else pick up tons of power. Experience is a big player in this game. Keeping the most velocity and allowing the best flow is key. Bigger is not necessarily better, especially on a small displacement engine.

Last edited by stallion8797; 09-08-2009 at 11:38 PM.
Old 09-08-2009 | 10:58 PM
  #8  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by stallion8797
Every head porter is different. I've sen people lose power with improper porting and then with the same heads ported by someone else pick up tons of power. Experience is a big player in this game. Keeping the most velocity and allowing the best flow is key. Bigger is not necessarily better, especially on a small displacement engine.
hopefully you'll get an M112K guy to port and see good results. keep us posted!
Old 09-08-2009 | 11:26 PM
  #9  
splinter's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 11
From: Orange County, CA
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
Originally Posted by stallion8797
..Keeping the most velocity and allowing the best flow is key. Bigger is not necessarily better, especially on a small displacement engine.
Healthy numbers – even from the stock ports. Dramatic improvements after your tweaks.
Was your data obtained at 28 inches of pressure differential?
After I:E flow ratio looks rather unusual IMHO. Of course, track times will ultimately tell the tale.

Good luck, Anthony.

www.tvtdes********
Old 09-09-2009 | 06:38 AM
  #10  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,341
Likes: 10
From: PA
S600, GL450, Audi A5 Cab
Originally Posted by splinter
Healthy numbers – even from the stock ports. Dramatic improvements after your tweaks.
Was your data obtained at 28 inches of pressure differential?
After I:E flow ratio looks rather unusual IMHO. Of course, track times will ultimately tell the tale.

Good luck, Anthony.

www.tvtdes********
You are not alone on this one

After mods, have a ratio of about 0.65 I/E

EVERY head I have EVER used was closer to about .75

I would like to see REAL world data, aka ET/MPH before and after please


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Ported Head flow numbers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.