C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

178mm Pulley + Tune = $1200.00!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #1  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
178mm Pulley + Tune = $1200.00!!!

I will be offering 5 combos of pulley/tune. Price includes shipping in the USA. If you would like it installed at our shop, price is $1300.00.

First 5 people only!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 05:57 PM
  #2  
Dingleberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 983
Likes: 2
From: USA
Marsaydees
ec has a deal for 185mm + tune for $1000...
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #3  
SETSEROCK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Republican Wasteland
HPF E46 M3 Turbo, LET C32 AMG
what is the difference in boost between 178 and 185?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #4  
OverDrive's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Volvo
178 = Around 18psi
185 = 22+ PSI
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
SETSEROCK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Republican Wasteland
HPF E46 M3 Turbo, LET C32 AMG
happen to know roughly how much hp each one makes above stock? And is 22 PSI going to shorten the life of the SC considerably? And can the stock intercooler even keep up?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #6  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by SETSEROCK
happen to know roughly how much hp each one makes above stock? And is 22 PSI going to shorten the life of the SC considerably? And can the stock intercooler even keep up?
i think that people usually see an additional 15-20 whp at least between the 178 and 185.

it is possible that the 22 psi will shorten the life of the sc, but so will the 178. you are running more boost. fwiw, the supercharger is cheap to buy off ebay.

if you upgrade to the 185, you SHOULD get an upgraded heat exchanger (not intercooler, but heat exchanger). LET sells them. Code3/HPAutowerks also makes them. I actually saw one of the latter for sale recently.

for the 185 though, you may also want to upgrade the intake and get colder spark plugs....and you will 100% require a tune
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 09:36 PM
  #7  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
Originally Posted by Dingleberry
ec has a deal for 185mm + tune for $1000...
For reasons of our own we don't like the 185mm. I can go into it this in great detail, but I would rather not.

That's a great deal though. Good thing we have a free market!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #8  
SETSEROCK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Republican Wasteland
HPF E46 M3 Turbo, LET C32 AMG
Without going into great detail, what is your reason for using the 178?
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 03:53 PM
  #9  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
Originally Posted by SETSEROCK
Without going into great detail, what is your reason for using the 178?
Better track times, less heat problems, less strain on motor, easier to upgrade for more boost, better throttle response, better traction...
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #10  
Dingleberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 983
Likes: 2
From: USA
Marsaydees
Originally Posted by TVT_DESIGN
Better track times, less heat problems, less strain on motor, easier to upgrade for more boost, better throttle response, better traction...
track times? where's the proof

less heat? less power

less strain? less power

easier to upgrade? okay...

better throttle response? proof?

better traction? that happens when you make less power...
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #11  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Dingleberry
track times? where's the proof

less heat? less power

less strain? less power

easier to upgrade? okay...

better throttle response? proof?

better traction? that happens when you make less power...
i think the only potential advantage of running a 178 vs a 185 actually comes if you run a 178 PLUS a machined down s/c pulley to give you the same boost as the 185.....and i think the advantage of that setup vs a 185 would be less rotating mass on the crank. other than that (a setup i have not tried), i feel ya. i've tried the code 3, the 178, and the 185 and the 185 easily feels the best.

and actually i think the 185 would have better throttle response since it apparently (read this somewhere, possibly the srt6 forum) activates the supercharger a little earleir.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #12  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
Originally Posted by Dingleberry
track times? where's the proof

less heat? less power

less strain? less power

easier to upgrade? okay...

better throttle response? proof?

better traction? that happens when you make less power...
The fastest SRT6 cars run 178 pulleys and not all of them are stacked. (more SRTs drag then C32s that we get in the shop, so that's why I'm referencing them)

Heat does not equal power. If you increase your IAT then the power goes down.

More strain does not equal more power. The whole point of lightening pulleys and drivetrain is reduce strain and thus more power.

Having a lighter weight pulley with more of its mass closer to the center will give you better throttle response.

Better traction comes with a better power band. Making tons of TQ down low is great for the dyno, but since all of my customers drive their cars, traction is very important.

Think of the 185 as a big turbo. It gets the max amount of power when compared to a smaller turbo, but isn't all that great on the street.

For the majority of cars that do a simple pulley, tune, HE, CM30, and intake, the 178 is best. For the cars that can offset the disadvantages of the 185 by increasing cooling capacity, opening up the exhaust with real headers, opening up the intake path with porting, and can get traction with a LSD, then I recommend the 185 or stacked pulleys (still like the stack over the 185).

We had a stacked pulley car and a 185 pulley car with matching supporting mods put down within 10RWHP of each other. The 178 pulleyed car ran better track times and was much more street friendly.

I sell 185mm pulleys too and can offer the price on those, but I just don't like to sell those.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #13  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by TVT_DESIGN

For the majority of cars that do a simple pulley, tune, HE, CM30, and intake, the 178 is best. For the cars that can offset the disadvantages of the 185 by increasing cooling capacity, opening up the exhaust with real headers, opening up the intake path with porting, and can get traction with a LSD, then I recommend the 185 or stacked pulleys (still like the stack over the 185).
two questions.

1) on the 178 + machined down vs the 185, were you seeing lower IATs on the 178? or were they about the same b/c of the same/similar boost levels?

2) regarding porting the intake, have you guys p/p'd one for a c32? i know needswings sells larger manis (iirc) for the srt6 but they don't fit the c32. what kinda gains could be realized with all supporting mods (see my sig)?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #14  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
Originally Posted by jturkel
two questions.

1) on the 178 + machined down vs the 185, were you seeing lower IATs on the 178? or were they about the same b/c of the same/similar boost levels?

2) regarding porting the intake, have you guys p/p'd one for a c32? i know needswings sells larger manis (iirc) for the srt6 but they don't fit the c32. what kinda gains could be realized with all supporting mods (see my sig)?
1) with a CM30 and E55 heat exchanger we were seeing IATs 20-25 degree lower then the 185mm. We've had several customers run stacked with only the CM30 upgrade and stock HE and still run slightly cooler temps. We run 178mm+69mm.

2) The porting involves opening up the neck as much as possible with the stock castings, gasket matching to the lower intake ports, and cleaning up the insides of the manis. You can also port the lower port connected to the SC for better gains. Typical gains are 10-15 RWHP and improved throttle and engine response. You'll actually notice the response more then the power.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #15  
Robert AMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 85
From: Lebanon
Cls63 & C32
C32 has same HE as E55, i don't know what SRT6 has.
The fact that most guys don't like the 185mm cause it's hard to TUNE,
a 185 pulley with a good tune is the best, the only one who can tune it correctly is Jerry.
Stacked pulley = belt slippage.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 04:46 PM
  #16  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
Originally Posted by Robert AMG
C32 has same HE as E55, i don't know what SRT6 has.
The fact that most guys don't like the 185mm cause it's hard to TUNE,
a 185 pulley with a good tune is the best, the only one who can tune it correctly is Jerry.
Stacked pulley = belt slippage.
The E55 HE is about 50% larger then the SRT6. I could have sworn the C32 was small as well. We got about 5 SRTs for every C32 in the shop.

The 185mm is not hard to tune. We've had plenty in here and they are all tuned just fine. Granted Jerry is our tuner, lol.

As for belt slip, we use machined down stock pulleys for stacking and machine back in the OEM groove shape and depth. A lot of machined down pulleys do not keep the OEM depth and size of the grooves and this causes the slip. We have not experienced any slip with the stacked set ups we've run. Plus you can make a belt wrap kit for like $50.00 if you want to be safe.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 05:40 PM
  #17  
SETSEROCK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Republican Wasteland
HPF E46 M3 Turbo, LET C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Dingleberry

less heat? less power
Really?? You couldnt be more wrong about that. More heat equals higher intake air temperatures, thus resulting in ignition timing being retarded by the ECU. Timing pull of just 5*s is very noticeable....The only ways to have the ECU pull timing is high IATs (via the IAT sensor) and low octane gasoline (via the knock sensors)....


Originally Posted by Dingleberry
less strain? less power
Interesting. Less strain=less broken parts. Seems so obvious that it need not be stated.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #18  
TVT_DESIGN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 1
From: Dunellen, NJ
Chrysler Crossfire
Originally Posted by SETSEROCK
Really?? You couldnt be more wrong about that. More heat equals higher intake air temperatures, thus resulting in ignition timing being retarded by the ECU. Timing pull of just 5*s is very noticeable....The only ways to have the ECU pull timing is high IATs (via the IAT sensor) and low octane gasoline (via the knock sensors)....




Interesting. Less strain=less broken parts. Seems so obvious that it need not be stated.

I thought the same thing...
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #19  
Dingleberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 983
Likes: 2
From: USA
Marsaydees
Originally Posted by SETSEROCK
Really?? You couldnt be more wrong about that. More heat equals higher intake air temperatures, thus resulting in ignition timing being retarded by the ECU. Timing pull of just 5*s is very noticeable....The only ways to have the ECU pull timing is high IATs (via the IAT sensor) and low octane gasoline (via the knock sensors)....




Interesting. Less strain=less broken parts. Seems so obvious that it need not be stated.
the forum has already concluded that you're a moron based on your responses in the corvette/gtr thread but i'll go ahead and address your post anyways...

when i said that more heat is produced, i did NOT say that IATs would be higher... any dullard would understand that a better heat exchanger and other cooling methods would be required to combat the higher heat produced by pumping more boost - and as a result, making more power DUH

everybody already well understands that other crap you posted as well...
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #20  
SETSEROCK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Republican Wasteland
HPF E46 M3 Turbo, LET C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Dingleberry

when i said that more heat is produced, i did NOT say that IATs would be higher... any dullard would understand that a better heat exchanger and other cooling methods would be required to combat the higher heat produced by pumping more boost - and as a result, making more...
just saying more heat=more power is a simply an incorrect statement. That is what you said.

Since when did you become "the whole forum"? You say the strangest things. Just because you see the mindless redneck machine that is the corvette as some engineering marvel, that doesn't mean it is, or that people will take some random guys opinion in a c-class forum (yours) as anything to give much merit to as far as it meaning anything at all. Sorry for the reality check. It'll be ok little guy.

Last edited by SETSEROCK; Jun 18, 2010 at 04:44 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 05:17 PM
  #21  
Dingleberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 983
Likes: 2
From: USA
Marsaydees
Originally Posted by SETSEROCK
just saying more heat=more power is a simply an incorrect statement. That is what you said.

Since when did you become "the whole forum"? You say the strangest things. Just because you see the mindless redneck machine that is the corvette as some engineering marvel, that doesn't mean it is, or that people will take some random guys opinion in a c-class forum (yours) as anything to give much merit to as far as it meaning anything at all. Sorry for the reality check. It'll be ok little guy.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #22  
saer1one's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Livingston, California.
2002 c32 AMG 2012 c250 Coupe
Originally Posted by SETSEROCK
just saying more heat=more power is a simply an incorrect statement. That is what you said.

Since when did you become "the whole forum"? You say the strangest things. Just because you see the mindless redneck machine that is the corvette as some engineering marvel, that doesn't mean it is, or that people will take some random guys opinion in a c-class forum (yours) as anything to give much merit to as far as it meaning anything at all. Sorry for the reality check. It'll be ok little guy.
just remember, your talking to a guy who runs all wheather radials at the track and wonders why he lost to a chevy cobalt SS..
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 09:54 PM
  #23  
Dingleberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 983
Likes: 2
From: USA
Marsaydees
Originally Posted by saer1one
just remember, your talking to a guy who runs all wheather radials at the track and wonders why he lost to a chevy cobalt SS..
huh? i ran a 13.4 bone stock on all season tires - that's a good time.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 12:08 AM
  #24  
SETSEROCK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Republican Wasteland
HPF E46 M3 Turbo, LET C32 AMG
Originally Posted by saer1one
just remember, your talking to a guy who runs all wheather radials at the track and wonders why he lost to a chevy cobalt SS..
Dingleberry, say it ain't so....
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 10:44 PM
  #25  
doom239's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
2002 C32 AMG
Sorry to steal the Tread but.
I need someone in SJ, CA to do my tuning, do you guys recommend anyone?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE