C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Trading my 06' C55 for Certf'd 04 Porsche 911 Coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-21-2011, 07:41 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
MJ9723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: La Jolla,CA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C55 AMG 2006
Arrow Trading my 06' C55 for Certf'd 04 Porsche 911 Coupe

Hi guys,
Need your advise please.
I am trading my 06' C55 for certified 2004 Porsche 911 Coupe
I have not had a Porsche before so need your advise; I would be grateful for all your advise/help! Link listed below:
kindest regards,
~MJ

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e&rdpage=thumb
Old 02-21-2011, 07:47 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MIKESV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aston Martin V8 Vantage
You're not upgrading/that's too much imo. Go for the 996 tt, that's what I'm going to eventually do.
Old 02-21-2011, 07:53 PM
  #3  
Member
 
reflex92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
02 C32 AMG, 2012 S550
For that amount of money their are much better options IMO. But still a nice car..
Old 02-21-2011, 08:09 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
ddtham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32, 911 SC
I have been thinking about getting my first Porsche and have done numerous readings online and Porsche enthusiast books. The general consensus in Porsche forums is that 996 Non-turbo are prone to the following:
1. Rear main seal leak
2. Intermediate shaft failure causing catastrophic engine damage (not that often I heard, but they do happen and this means brand new engine if not detected early)
3. Stiff clutch requiring updated parts
In that price range, there's a lot of fine cars you can get if performance is a huge criteria. Mk 2 911 non-TT is comparable to C32/55 in a straight line. W211 E55/63 is much faster or you can get SL55 if you want two door.

The 996 TT however is pretty much bullet proof. So it depends on what you need/want, but I would spring the extra money for a TT

Good luck!
Old 02-21-2011, 08:22 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Viper98912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Atlanta Metro
Posts: 2,965
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
Originally Posted by ddtham
I have been thinking about getting my first Porsche and have done numerous readings online and Porsche enthusiast books. The general consensus in Porsche forums is that 996 Non-turbo are prone to the following:
1. Rear main seal leak
2. Intermediate shaft failure causing catastrophic engine damage (not that often I heard, but they do happen and this means brand new engine if not detected early)
3. Stiff clutch requiring updated parts
In that price range, there's a lot of fine cars you can get if performance is a huge criteria. Mk 2 911 non-TT is comparable to C32/55 in a straight line. W211 E55/63 is much faster or you can get SL55 if you want two door.

The 996 TT however is pretty much bullet proof. So it depends on what you need/want, but I would spring the extra money for a TT

Good luck!
This is exactly why I didn't buy a 911, and why you can get them so cheap. Look a few years before the engine redesign and you'll see them about double the price.
Old 02-21-2011, 08:28 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Gramma_Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Bay, Bay Area
Posts: 2,000
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
2002 C32, 2012 S550
Yeah, 911's have always been my favorite car, but if you look at the price differences between the 993's and the 996's....that tells it all. Older car, twice the price.

993 FTW!
Old 02-21-2011, 09:35 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Mark.D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C55 AMG
I love 911's. But I would NEVER own one without a FLAWLESS history. And I would never own one if I didn't have something else to drive daily. The dealership support sucks, repairs are extreme. And to be honest, they are a dime a dozen, I'm not so sure they are as special as they once were.

That being said, if you are going to use this as a weekend car, why not just go for the C2S?

Trending Topics

Old 02-21-2011, 09:50 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by ddtham
I have been thinking about getting my first Porsche and have done numerous readings online and Porsche enthusiast books. The general consensus in Porsche forums is that 996 Non-turbo are prone to the following:
1. Rear main seal leak
2. Intermediate shaft failure causing catastrophic engine damage (not that often I heard, but they do happen and this means brand new engine if not detected early)
3. Stiff clutch requiring updated parts
In that price range, there's a lot of fine cars you can get if performance is a huge criteria. Mk 2 911 non-TT is comparable to C32/55 in a straight line. W211 E55/63 is much faster or you can get SL55 if you want two door.

The 996 TT however is pretty much bullet proof. So it depends on what you need/want, but I would spring the extra money for a TT

Good luck!


*** Totally agree ^^^^, I'd get the TT if YOU had the $$$, one of the greatest performance cars ever made *** Find one with Sport Chrono and you're rockin..............
Old 02-21-2011, 10:06 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wawy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
Nice car. At least its an S
Old 02-21-2011, 10:46 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
At least its an S
My neighbor picked a 03 up for $8K off of CoPart, pulled motor, upgraded the crankshaft, repainted it, and got a new interior.
The interior is dated but its getting cocha off the streets of miami
Ive been tempted to loan him the E Cinco Cinco to see it's true P*ssy Power.
Still its a nice car nonetheless
Old 02-22-2011, 04:00 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RLx02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,375
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
C55
Originally Posted by Viper98912
This is exactly why I didn't buy a 911, and why you can get them so cheap. Look a few years before the engine redesign and you'll see them about double the price.
Same. There was a website talking about how 911's have random engine failures...the TT's are bulletproof but the n/a ones were not.
Old 02-22-2011, 04:14 AM
  #12  
Member
 
ByeTurboS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'02 C32 ///AMG, 2000 BiTurbo Audi S4(RIP)
Non Turbo 911s are sick cars, and theres def something to be said about rolling a sick P-car, but Ive been test driving a lot of them, and they def feel slower than you might expect. Slower than my chipped s4. There also not a ton of room for performance mods without spending tens of thousands of dollars. Most carrera owners will talk about suspension mods. The problem is everyone says just get a Turbo but the price jump is huge! At this point Id rather have the torque monster c32. Turbo one day.
Old 02-22-2011, 12:40 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
MJ9723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: La Jolla,CA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C55 AMG 2006
Many thanks Guys for all your input!
It is very helpful. Much appreciated!
the only thing is that the Porsche is certified for 100k/2years (from now) does that have any merit to it? Will the car hold its value in 2 years time?
cheers

Last edited by MJ9723; 02-22-2011 at 12:43 PM.
Old 02-22-2011, 12:56 PM
  #14  
PJK
Junior Member
 
PJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northeast
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK63BS
I don't have either a 993 or a 996 (nor have I ever owned a P car), but the price difference between the two designs is primarily due to the aesthetic differences (the 993 is nicer looking) and the fact that the 993 is the last air cooled engine (and 911s are supposed to be air cooled according to the die hard Porshefiles).

Engine reliability is NOT the reason for the price difference.

To further prove this point, compare the prices of the 993TT and 996TT. The 993TT is more money and is slower (and not any more reliable).



Originally Posted by Gramma_Benz
Yeah, 911's have always been my favorite car, but if you look at the price differences between the 993's and the 996's....that tells it all. Older car, twice the price.

993 FTW!
Old 02-22-2011, 01:17 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
xxaarraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 793
Received 66 Likes on 37 Posts
Multiple
Originally Posted by MJ9723
Many thanks Guys for all your input!
It is very helpful. Much appreciated!
the only thing is that the Porsche is certified for 100k/2years (from now) does that have any merit to it? Will the car hold its value in 2 years time?
cheers
Yes. Certified for 2 years is a HUGE plus in my book. All this talk of engine failure becomes moot if there is Porsche warranty for 2 years. The price seems reasonable. The depreciation on that in 2 years may be very similar to the depreciation on your C55 in two years, so what do you lose?

I personally wouldn't do it since non-turbo P-cars aren't as quick but cost a lot of money. If you were looking for a high-strung, sporty, top handling car, what's wrong with an M3? Thousands cheaper than a P-car, same performance in my book. I just don't think they are good value, but that's just me.

But if you have your heart set on it, I say it sounds like a good deal. Keep us posted on how it goes!
Old 02-22-2011, 03:21 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Cocha Cruiser

Originally Posted by xxaarraa
Yes. Certified for 2 years is a HUGE plus in my book. All this talk of engine failure becomes moot if there is Porsche warranty for 2 years. The price seems reasonable. The depreciation on that in 2 years may be very similar to the depreciation on your C55 in two years, so what do you lose?

I personally wouldn't do it since non-turbo P-cars aren't as quick but cost a lot of money. If you were looking for a high-strung, sporty, top handling car, what's wrong with an M3? Thousands cheaper than a P-car, same performance in my book. I just don't think they are good value, but that's just me.

But if you have your heart set on it, I say it sounds like a good deal. Keep us posted on how it goes!
Where do I start?? So, you're saying trade in your C55 for an M3??? HMM, sounds like a downgrade to me, BUT hey, thats just me.

And, the M3 wont get Miami Cocha like the P Car, so thats the real reason...........
Old 02-22-2011, 03:28 PM
  #17  
Super Member
 
xxaarraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 793
Received 66 Likes on 37 Posts
Multiple
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Where do I start?? So, you're saying trade in your C55 for an M3??? HMM, sounds like a downgrade to me, BUT hey, thats just me.

And, the M3 wont get Miami Cocha like the P Car, so thats the real reason...........
Not comparing M3 to C55, comparing M3 to non-turbo 911. Not sure how you understood my post to be a comparison of M3 to C55.

I was trying to explain that 911/M3 = both high strung, tightly sprung track cars that are low on torque, make power high up in the band. M3 is right up there with the non-turbo 911 performance-wise but better value.

I just recently sold my M3, so well aware.
Old 02-22-2011, 03:55 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
Not comparing M3 to C55, comparing M3 to non-turbo 911. Not sure how you understood my post to be a comparison of M3 to C55.

I was trying to explain that 911/M3 = both high strung, tightly sprung track cars that are low on torque, make power high up in the band. M3 is right up there with the non-turbo 911 performance-wise but better value.

I just recently sold my M3, so well aware.
I got you loud and clear, BUT seems to me that going from a 4 door C55 to a 4 Door M3 is not what he'd looking for?? If he were looking for ultimate handling and a two seater, I'd do a AP2 (F22C1) and call it a day!!!
Old 02-22-2011, 06:26 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Viper98912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Atlanta Metro
Posts: 2,965
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
Turning onto my street I saw a Porsche on a flatbed. Heh
Old 02-22-2011, 08:07 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
PadresFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 C55
The general consensus in Porsche forums is that 996 Non-turbo are prone to the following:
1. Rear main seal leak
2. Intermediate shaft failure causing catastrophic engine damage (not that often I heard, but they do happen and this means brand new engine if not detected early)
3. Stiff clutch requiring updated parts


My last car was a Porsche '03 986S, and the 3.2l M96 engine is the same design as the 996. I can tell you I had not one, but two RMS failures in 3 years, the second was caused by the failure of another part, the Air/Oil Seperator (another common failure). The clutch gets stiffer as it wears, I replaced my first at 47k miles. The IMS failure is real and scary. There's no official stats on this from Porsche, but I've heard as high as 10% failure rate. Go to renntech.org and search "IMS failure". There are guys on the forum who've had multiple IMS failures. You can also search flat6innovations, who have designed an upgrade to solve the IMS issue, if you want to be proactive.
Old 02-22-2011, 08:42 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by PadresFan
The general consensus in Porsche forums is that 996 Non-turbo are prone to the following:
1. Rear main seal leak
2. Intermediate shaft failure causing catastrophic engine damage (not that often I heard, but they do happen and this means brand new engine if not detected early)
3. Stiff clutch requiring updated parts


My last car was a Porsche '03 986S, and the 3.2l M96 engine is the same design as the 996. I can tell you I had not one, but two RMS failures in 3 years, the second was caused by the failure of another part, the Air/Oil Seperator (another common failure). The clutch gets stiffer as it wears, I replaced my first at 47k miles. The IMS failure is real and scary. There's no official stats on this from Porsche, but I've heard as high as 10% failure rate. Go to renntech.org and search "IMS failure". There are guys on the forum who've had multiple IMS failures. You can also search flat6innovations, who have designed an upgrade to solve the IMS issue, if you want to be proactive.
+1, great info thanks for sharing? Sounds like the Sword of Damocles engine failures problem that BMW had about the same time

Out of interest, does the P-Car TT suffer these problems as well??
Old 02-22-2011, 09:32 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MIKESV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aston Martin V8 Vantage
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
+1, great info thanks for sharing? Sounds like the Sword of Damocles engine failures problem that BMW had about the same time

Out of interest, does the P-Car TT suffer these problems as well??
no, all tt owners i know say they'd buy one again (and they did actually a few times) and i read up about the 996 tt engine and i read that some of its components are shared in the gt1. i'll try to find the article.
Old 02-22-2011, 09:55 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
PadresFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 C55
To my knowledge, the flaw is in the M96 engine. Any car with one of those, regardless of liter disposition or model or year, has the potential for the IMS failure. If I recall, there was a factory attempt to 'upgrade' the bearing and bolt design at the root cause of the IMS failures, but this hasn't eliminated it altogether. I asked my SA to check my bearing during one of my RMS replacements, since I already had access to the part since the transmission was out of the car. I even inquired if they'd replace with the flat6 innovations part if I ordered it. They indicated I had the upgraded Porsche part, and of course refused to install an aftermarket part if I purchased it.

That said, I loved that car and would own another if it wasn't my DD.
Old 02-22-2011, 11:32 PM
  #24  
Super Member
 
rlddlr53's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sherman Oaks, California
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
09 C63 AMG, 05 C55 AMG
My father has a 993 c4s, hands down better than a 996 anyday
Old 02-23-2011, 11:29 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by rlddlr53
My father has a 993 c4s, hands down better than a 996 anyday
Depends on whether you want a wasserboxer or not??? 993s are looking really dated these days!! (Particularly the interior)

Plus, you can't pull that kind of power out of an air-cooled engine!! The sound of the 993 is to die for though!!! Nothing better under hard acceleration.........Just squats and goes!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Trading my 06' C55 for Certf'd 04 Porsche 911 Coupe



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 AM.