C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

cts v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-18-2011, 05:20 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
spatton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG - 2009 C300 Sport
cts v

saw a cts v today so i followed him until we were out of traffic finally got in next to him at the front of the light.....we both gunned it on green and he pulled away almost 3 car lengths and we stayed about the same up to 80 before we had to slow down...fast car lol...he squealed the tires in every gear and it had a badass sound....looked to me like an older one but i could be wrong what do you guys think?
Old 05-18-2011, 05:36 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by spatton
saw a cts v today so i followed him until we were out of traffic finally got in next to him at the front of the light.....we both gunned it on green and he pulled away almost 3 car lengths and we stayed about the same up to 80 before we had to slow down...fast car lol...he squealed the tires in every gear and it had a badass sound....looked to me like an older one but i could be wrong what do you guys think?
well which one was it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadillac_CTS-V

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say it was indeed an older one. the newer second gen, which is supercharged, would have pulled more than 3 cars on you. your car is relatively stock from a performance perspective....additionally, the CTS V motors (LS2 and LS6 in the 1st gen) are relatively cheap to mod and are very responsive to modifications (make a CRAP ton of power off headers). i don't see this result as a surprise
Old 05-18-2011, 05:55 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
spatton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG - 2009 C300 Sport
yea it was prolly an old one....it was pretty sweet...the new ones must be insane fast
Old 05-18-2011, 05:56 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
spatton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG - 2009 C300 Sport
Originally Posted by jturkel
well which one was it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadillac_CTS-V

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say it was indeed an older one. the newer second gen, which is supercharged, would have pulled more than 3 cars on you. your car is relatively stock from a performance perspective....additionally, the CTS V motors (LS2 and LS6 in the 1st gen) are relatively cheap to mod and are very responsive to modifications (make a CRAP ton of power off headers). i don't see this result as a surprise
do you think you woulda stayed with him with your mods
Old 05-18-2011, 06:51 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by spatton
do you think you woulda stayed with him with your mods
idk what his mods were. i can tell you that i hang with a factory freak LS1 camaro with lid, long tube headers, and catback exhaust with an excellent driver.

i've pulled on stock CTS-Vs in the past from that generation...can't say i've raced a highly modded one. i've pulled on or stayed with some relatively "quick" cars....like a turbo g35 running i think 6 psi (this was before i had headers)...i imagine that i could likely stay even or pull on one with long tubes....but who knows? paper racing is just paper racing lol. gotta line it up at the drag strip or somethin to know for sure.

i do respect those engines though and their responsiveness to modifications....those LS motors are legit. and y'all might hate on me for this comment, but i actually liked the Pontiact G8 GXP and would rock it. love those engines.
Old 05-18-2011, 06:52 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by spatton
yea it was prolly an old one....it was pretty sweet...the new ones must be insane fast
and yah...the new ones are nuts. those are like in the E55/63 category in terms of speed and VERY responsive to mods (despite being the smaller compact C-class size i think).
Old 05-18-2011, 07:43 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
qship5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
M5, C63, 335Ci
The current gen CTS-V is fast in stock trim and with a pulley, CAI and tune is crazy fast. I very heavily tuned 55 or 63 has a tough time keeping up with a tuned CTS-V.
Old 05-18-2011, 09:50 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by jturkel
and yah...the new ones are nuts. those are like in the E55/63 category in terms of speed and VERY responsive to mods (despite being the smaller compact C-class size i think).
The new CTS V In every challenge televised they are more then a match to the E or CLS63 as well as the M5....On a show with pro racers Paul and Ryan the E63 only barely beat it in top speed in a mile other then that it got its a$$ handed to it.
Old 05-19-2011, 11:48 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
02C32guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DE
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by jturkel
those LS motors are legit. and y'all might hate on me for this comment, but i actually liked the Pontiact G8 GXP and would rock it. love those engines.
Totally agree. I'm flamed on here any time I mention them though...
Old 05-19-2011, 12:56 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by qship5
The current gen CTS-V is fast in stock trim and with a pulley, CAI and tune is crazy fast. I very heavily tuned 55 or 63 has a tough time keeping up with a tuned CTS-V.
I've raced older ones (CTS-V ) in the 32 and have hung with them and I am modded. I looked at old tests for the 04 model and they seem to run in the high 12s, low 13s at between 106-112 (on average and stock). Modded is a whole other story and they will clean our plate. They are very heavy cars though and and do have issues hooking.

The new ones, 09-XX forget it, they are very quick and fast and are more on terms of a very good running Vette!! The Kleemann has run a 10 CTS-V and hung with it...................

The Caddy V models are nothing to scoff at..................

The 04-05s all seem to have hooking issues and have a decent trap but low 13 times, so I'd reckon that without drag radials, they are very hard to launch...........I imagine that the 60 foot times are reflective of this issue and a show of Dragtimes confirms this that the older V s are all over 2.0 on the 60 foot times........The new ones aren't doing much better on street tires.........

Last edited by Newzchspy; 05-19-2011 at 12:59 PM.
Old 05-19-2011, 03:28 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
spatton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG - 2009 C300 Sport
here it is
Attached Thumbnails cts v-photo-6-.jpg  
Old 05-19-2011, 03:32 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by spatton
here it is
definitely the 1st gen. definitely has exhaust, likely long tubes and catback exhaust
Old 05-19-2011, 03:48 PM
  #13  
Member

 
markpetersonii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belle Plaine, MN
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E500 Sport
GM LSX engines FTW! lol

Sorry guys, had to jump in on this when I saw CTS-V as the title. I love my E500 but, hate me for saying it, but I would love to try and stuff an LSX engine in my E500 just to do it and scare the ever loving **** out of people trying to mess with my Benz.

/threadjack


PS. I've had 2 Pontiac GTOs with the LS2s in them and I had a blast adding and adding power.
Old 05-19-2011, 04:29 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by jturkel
definitely the 1st gen. definitely has exhaust, likely long tubes and catback exhaust
+1, prolly an 04-05??
Old 05-19-2011, 05:26 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
Ive read that every AMG E owner who has sold their car for the new CTS-V winds up wishing they kept their car or went back to it.
Old 05-19-2011, 06:15 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by moosejaw
Ive read that every AMG E owner who has sold their car for the new CTS-V winds up wishing they kept their car or went back to it.
Geez, look at what the cat, er, I mean CTS-V dragged in........................

BUT those who had a C32 before their E55 still miss their C 32
Old 05-19-2011, 08:10 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
spatton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG - 2009 C300 Sport
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Geez, look at what the cat, er, I mean CTS-V dragged in........................

BUT those who had a C32 before their E55 still miss their C 32
lol....so how do you like your e55 compared to the c32?? whats the gas milage difference
Old 05-19-2011, 08:18 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gt4awd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 Pontiac GTO 6.0 LS2 - Blue
Few trips back to the dragway CTS-V was running stock. Fast car hitting into 12's at 5500FT.
Old 05-20-2011, 12:25 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
moosejaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
none
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
Geez, look at what the cat, er, I mean CTS-V dragged in........................

BUT those who had a C32 before their E55 still miss their C 32
i see you have been postwhoring again.
too bad about your blackhawks...
looks like the heat will do you in too.
Old 05-20-2011, 12:28 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by moosejaw
i see you have been postwhoring again.
too bad about your blackhawks...
looks like the heat will do you in too.
lol
Old 05-20-2011, 02:31 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DuaneC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/San Francisco
Posts: 1,599
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
AMG GLC63. Audi R8
They are fast but I've never seen one on the street.
Old 05-20-2011, 07:14 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Newzchspy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,165
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
PLAID
Originally Posted by jturkel
lol
The heat always does me in, thats why I dont live in FLA!!!

It ain't over till the fat lady sings.
Old 05-21-2011, 07:44 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Mark.D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C55 AMG
Originally Posted by moosejaw
Ive read that every AMG E owner who has sold their car for the new CTS-V winds up wishing they kept their car or went back to it.
I believe it. The fit, finish, quality still has a ways to go. They are fast, but I wouldn't want anything to do with one.
Old 05-21-2011, 07:58 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MercedesFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cee Fiddy Five
Originally Posted by jturkel
and yah...the new ones are nuts. those are like in the E55/63 category in terms of speed and VERY responsive to mods (despite being the smaller compact C-class size i think).
The new CTS got bigger I believe, to be in the same category as the E and 5 series. That's what the Caddy salesperson said at least.
Old 05-22-2011, 05:01 AM
  #25  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark.D
I believe it. The fit, finish, quality still has a ways to go. They are fast, but I wouldn't want anything to do with one.
Are we talking about the E or the Caddy

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: cts v



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 AM.