95 vs 96 C36 rear diff question
I've driven 2 95's including one that I'm considering buying. Both aren't capable of breaking the tires loose at all unless I brake stand them.
Once moving they still haul, but I find it odd.
Anyone else notice this ?
The only thing I can think of is that my 96 had a tired LSD, but it only had 130K. Hmmm
The only difference between a 95 and a 96 C36 has to be in the Diff ratio;
the 95 had the 4-speed auto and as such the tall 2.87 diff
the 96 had the 5-speed auto and as such a shorter 3.07 diff.
this would explain the better off the line performance.
The only difference between a 95 and a 96 C36 has to be in the Diff ratio;
the 95 had the 4-speed auto and as such the tall 2.87 diff
the 96 had the 5-speed auto and as such a shorter 3.07 diff.
this would explain the better off the line performance.
The only difference between a 95 and a 96 C36 has to be in the Diff ratio;
the 95 had the 4-speed auto and as such the tall 2.87 diff
the 96 had the 5-speed auto and as such a shorter 3.07 diff.
this would explain the better off the line performance.
Really ? My 96 still had the 4 spd....while my friends 97 had the 5 spd driver adaptive tranny w/ W/S mode.
but i agree that its got to be a gear difference.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG







