C36 AMG, C43 AMG (W202) 1995 - 2000

When you first drove the c43 did you expect it to be slower or faster than it was?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-18-2012, 01:46 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
illmaticnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 C43 AMG
When you first drove the c43 did you expect it to be slower or faster than it was?

for me it was slower than i thought...ripped it open on the highway...the car def feels less growly when doing 75mph but feels like it pulls really hard say between 25 and 70....what are your thoughts? dont get me wrong. the car doesnt feel slow but not AS fast as i had imagined. great car nonetheless!
Old 05-18-2012, 04:51 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
KJI3jflarryfe93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 0
Received 36 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by illmaticnyc
for me it was slower than i thought...ripped it open on the highway...the car def feels less growly when doing 75mph but feels like it pulls really hard say between 25 and 70....what are your thoughts? dont get me wrong. the car doesnt feel slow but not AS fast as i had imagined. great car nonetheless!
maybe your car has a fawlty airmass sensor??
you'll have 306 lazy donkeys instead of real HP.
Old 05-19-2012, 04:34 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DRBC43AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Land of mountains, cheese, chocolate and watches
Posts: 5,669
Received 256 Likes on 216 Posts
12' W204 C63 AMG coupe "T-Rex", 12' W451 Smart Fortwo Pulse (99' W202 C43 AMG sold)
Originally Posted by illmaticnyc
for me it was slower than i thought...ripped it open on the highway...the car def feels less growly when doing 75mph but feels like it pulls really hard say between 25 and 70....what are your thoughts? dont get me wrong. the car doesnt feel slow but not AS fast as i had imagined. great car nonetheless!
OK it should not be compared to some of current supercar performances. Don't forget, you are talking of a vehicle dating from 12-14 years ago. At that time it was really QUICK.
If you feel it is sluggish, it could be as Kowalski says due to a faulty MAF. As the ECU has "fuzzy logic" built in, it could be due that the vehicule has been driven Grandpa style and the electronics has adapted to that kind of driving.
Check the search function and look for How To do a ECU reset. That works but the full reset needs to be done using Star
Old 05-19-2012, 04:35 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
w202mylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Carlsson CM60 EX:C36AMG'96
lol it's hard to tell different people expect different performance, I would check the map sensor out. Try to find someone in your area with a stock good running c43 and try out how his one drives. for me the c36( 95% of how the c43 accelerates) feels great it stays really strong at all speeds, it tops out after 170mph
Old 05-19-2012, 11:01 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
illmaticnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 C43 AMG
Originally Posted by w202mylove
lol it's hard to tell different people expect different performance, I would check the map sensor out. Try to find someone in your area with a stock good running c43 and try out how his one drives. for me the c36( 95% of how the c43 accelerates) feels great it stays really strong at all speeds, it tops out after 170mph
going to a guys shop and gettnig it all hooked up next week!
Old 05-19-2012, 11:21 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
illmaticnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 C43 AMG
is the MAP for the pressure and the MAF for the air flow in intake? should i do both?
Old 05-19-2012, 11:17 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
503C43 ////AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 4,433
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
1999 C43, 2008 P30 E63, 2014 SQ5, 2024 Model Y Performance
Originally Posted by illmaticnyc
is the MAP for the pressure and the MAF for the air flow in intake? should i do both?

C43 doesn't have a MAP sensor, only MAF
Old 05-21-2012, 02:08 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
illmaticnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 C43 AMG
its amazing how much the tech has changed.

for the 2008 honda accord v6?!
For V6, Road and Track reported 5.9 sec. 1/4 @ 14.5 sec.

must say though that this car is absolutely beautiful. love this generation c class
Old 06-08-2012, 01:03 AM
  #9  
23K
Junior Member
 
23K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I test drove two,one was slower than I expected,and the other alot faster. I would assume mtce makes a big difference!
Old 06-08-2012, 05:41 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
w202mylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Carlsson CM60 EX:C36AMG'96
Originally Posted by 23K
I test drove two,one was slower than I expected,and the other alot faster. I would assume mtce makes a big difference!
I agree this is very important! same for c36 ofcourse I noticed the same testdriving a few of them.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: When you first drove the c43 did you expect it to be slower or faster than it was?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.