C43 Coupe Fuel Economy Listed on MBUSA Website
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
However, the drive was great. The 4 matic is perfect, wish the c63s had that would be more fun during launches and corners
Lot of slack going on in the thread, chill out guys. If you have a problem with the C43, keep out of their threads
#52
No butt hurt here. I wanted the pure AMG experience. Otherwise I would have just gotten a S4 or something in the sub-400hp.
When you buy a AMG it's status, performance and style. I know when I pull along side an M3/4 or a Cayman, I have a beast who will get their respect (even without racing). With a C43, that is just not going to happen. That was a big deal for me!
When you buy a AMG it's status, performance and style. I know when I pull along side an M3/4 or a Cayman, I have a beast who will get their respect (even without racing). With a C43, that is just not going to happen. That was a big deal for me!
you must be really smart
#53
Unfortunately they do not. I did test out a C43 the other day and its body did not look like my coupe. No wide arches in the rear.
However, the drive was great. The 4 matic is perfect, wish the c63s had that would be more fun during launches and corners
Lot of slack going on in the thread, chill out guys. If you have a problem with the C43, keep out of their threads
However, the drive was great. The 4 matic is perfect, wish the c63s had that would be more fun during launches and corners
Lot of slack going on in the thread, chill out guys. If you have a problem with the C43, keep out of their threads
#54
Since amg began and thrived by building motors, I consider the one man one motor philosophy the core of what makes an amg.
I consider the c43 along the lines with the BMW m sport and the audi s-line. The a4 s-line has a lot of the same styling and components but the motor is just not the same as the s4. The BMW m sport has the aggressive styling but a completely different motor than the Ms.
I feel that Mercedes decided to take away the amg sport brand and just sell them as an amg to bring customers into a higher price bracket. Amg sells and we are all proof of it.
If the car works for you then great. I will, however, argue that there is a difference between the c43 and c63.
I consider the c43 along the lines with the BMW m sport and the audi s-line. The a4 s-line has a lot of the same styling and components but the motor is just not the same as the s4. The BMW m sport has the aggressive styling but a completely different motor than the Ms.
I feel that Mercedes decided to take away the amg sport brand and just sell them as an amg to bring customers into a higher price bracket. Amg sells and we are all proof of it.
If the car works for you then great. I will, however, argue that there is a difference between the c43 and c63.
Last edited by Dthquazi; 10-13-2016 at 11:09 PM.
#55
Mate, nobody is arguing against that (or shouldn't be anyway). The difference between the c43 and c63 is night and day. This whole thing started with one sour owner lashing out for no good reason. Let's not let one bad apple ruin the bunch
The following users liked this post:
I almost I (05-23-2017)
#56
MBWorld Fanatic!
However, visually you can definitely see the difference in the 2 cars. Both front and rear arches are more flared out.
#57
Super Member
MBUSA:
C300 Coupe
Overall length 184.5 in
Overall height 55.3 in
Overall width 71.3 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag 0.2990
Curb weight 3,638 lbs
C43 Coupe
Overall length 184.9 in
Overall height 55.3 in
Overall width 71.3 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag TBD
Curb weight 3,935 lbs
C63 S Coupe
Overall length 187.0 in
Overall height 55.2 in
Overall width 73.6 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag 0.35
Curb weight 4,096 lbs
The following users liked this post:
dvrklord (10-14-2016)
#58
Per MBUSA.com specs, no the C43C has the same dimensions as C300C.
Where did you find that info?
MBUSA:
C300 Coupe
Overall length 184.5 in
Overall height 55.3 in
Overall width 71.3 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag 0.2990
Curb weight 3,638 lbs
C43 Coupe
Overall length 184.9 in
Overall height 55.3 in
Overall width 71.3 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag TBD
Curb weight 3,935 lbs
C63 S Coupe
Overall length 187.0 in
Overall height 55.2 in
Overall width 73.6 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag 0.35
Curb weight 4,096 lbs
Where did you find that info?
MBUSA:
C300 Coupe
Overall length 184.5 in
Overall height 55.3 in
Overall width 71.3 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag 0.2990
Curb weight 3,638 lbs
C43 Coupe
Overall length 184.9 in
Overall height 55.3 in
Overall width 71.3 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag TBD
Curb weight 3,935 lbs
C63 S Coupe
Overall length 187.0 in
Overall height 55.2 in
Overall width 73.6 in (without mirrors)
Wheelbase 111.8 in
Coefficient of drag 0.35
Curb weight 4,096 lbs
Edit: Here is what I was referring to, credit to Viper.
Last edited by Tej7; 10-14-2016 at 12:24 AM.
#59
MBWorld Fanatic!
I was only referring to the difference track width between the c300 and the c43. I'll have to dig through some of the other threads to prove my point (I really don't want to, I'm lazy lol), but a member posted the differences in specs. It wasn't even a major difference.. I believe it was within an inch of a difference.
Edit: Here is what I was referring to, credit to Viper.
Edit: Here is what I was referring to, credit to Viper.
#60
The following users liked this post:
Guilty (10-17-2016)
#65
And I think by the way this thread is going the only one making a fool of themselves is you.