C450/C43 AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

In the Market for a New Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-30-2018, 07:50 PM
  #26  
Member
 
J**2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Oklahoma USA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2019 c43 AMG
Originally Posted by 5ilver-5urfer
Interesting. My younger bro has a GT (without the performance package) and it's substantially smoother on all types of pavement than my C43. I've heard the performance package really does a number on the harshness of the GT ride so maybe that's why you feel that way. Having had considerable time in both cars though - the C43 has a harsher ride in my case.
my point wasn’t that the c43 rides like a dream but that the performance package in a mustang really makes the ride harsh compared to a 43. I think there is a significant difference between 18” and 19” wheels also

Ive also driven the Audi rs5 which also rode much harsher than the merc
Old 06-30-2018, 08:33 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mr. J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,564
Received 263 Likes on 207 Posts
C450, GLC43
Originally Posted by J**2


because I drove on the roads I wanted to drive on not the ones the dealer wanted and I’ve driven three different c43s each for over 30 minutes and my mustang even on smooth roads feels every crack and undulation.
OK. So you've taken it for a test drive, great!
Old 06-30-2018, 08:38 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
5ilver-5urfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 434
Received 84 Likes on 62 Posts
A Benz and a BMW
Originally Posted by Mr. J
What year is your C43?
17
Old 07-01-2018, 03:20 AM
  #29  
Newbie
 
Auto Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 11
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
none yet
Originally Posted by Clint Westwood
I don't know about the F series BMW's because I haven't driven one, but I can tell you this for sure. My E92 with non RFT's was much more harsh than my C43 with RFT's. Now when I I get non-RFT's on my C43, the ride will be about perfect in sport mode.
i came from an e92 335xi coupe with 19 inch m359 wheels and Michelin SS. My c43 coupe has the 19 inch wheels with the pirelli p zero RFTs. I find the Merc more harsh than my BMW setup. However with the stock 18 inch 193M wheels and Bridgestone RFTs that came with the BMW, the BMW was more harsh than the Merc with that configuration IMO.
Old 07-01-2018, 04:17 AM
  #30  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Joshua Stein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes
Update

.

Last edited by Joshua Stein; 05-08-2020 at 07:09 PM.
Old 07-02-2018, 01:53 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RichardCranium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,016
Received 274 Likes on 204 Posts
'19 CLS450
Originally Posted by Mr. J
Go flats makes hardly any difference at all. This is largely myth. I run Pilot AS3+ go-flats on my 19" wheels for fall and winter and swap to the stock conti run-flats in the summertime. The difference is barely perceptible. Wheel diameter is much more significant than tire composition.

And to point out what is blatantly obvious, racetracks are all made of silky smoothe asphalt, city streets are not. This should be clearly evident to any American driver with at least a learner's permit and a couple days of driving experience. Streets have: potholes, broken pavement, expansion joints, uneven grade, etc...

I like my car but it has some glaring deficiencies that I have learned about over the course of two years of ownership and 15000 driven miles. I am not a fanboy, I am a beta tester who has also driven quite a few other makes of vehicles in this segment.
A matter of opinion...YMMV. When I swapped from stock conti RFs, I 100% noticed noticed a difference. Furthermore, the wife, who couldn't be more oblivious, commented unsolicited that the ride was very different.
Old 07-05-2018, 01:33 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
alexasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 3,222
Received 676 Likes on 533 Posts
c
Originally Posted by Joshua Stein
While out of town I actually got time and stopped by an Audi dealer and test drove both an S5 and an S5 sportback (the coupe had the regular steering while the sportback had the "dynamic steering" option) and even an A4 with the 2.0L turbo and a 6-speed manual just for fun (I was shocked they had a stick). Overall I was somewhat disappointed with the S5, and found the A4 actually better. Overall all three cars were lacking in steering. I didn't expect much feel, and didn't get really any from the rack but the steering was also too light, which was okay in comfort mode, but even in sport mode they were way too light and lacking any feel of the front tires. The dynamic steering (which has to be bundled with another package for about $2-3K total) was a big letdown, all it did was add weight, which rather than tightening the system or making it feel agile, or actually having feel, just felt plain unnatural. It felt like they just added weight so they could market it as "sporty" and didn't inspire me with much confidence when driving, even with quattro awd. Another weird thing was the throttle/gas pedal. It feels like you really need to press it hard to get any power out of the engine which is weird cause the thing has over 300hp, like the first half of travel, nothing happens I swear, but then the regular A4 has a normal feeling throttle, delivering what felt more linear of a powerband (sorry if I'm using all these terms wrong, its hard to explain). The A4 was a complete surprise, it drove much better than the S5, and I don't know why. It inspired more confidence, maybe it was the whole, "going fast in a slow car" thing, but it just felt better than a S5, but the steering and engine noise was still disappointing. My final disappointment was materials/quality. On a mercedes and BMW if you have leather. The doors, armrests, and even other areas of the car have leather with stitching accenting them, even my 04 330i has leather stitched door pannels. The audi A4, plain rubbery material (not even sure if it was leatherette), with no stitching or accents, it just looked so plain and empty on the doors and armrests, which is completely unnaceptable for a luxury car, no less a $50k +. The S5, had an "option" which added to the price just to get leatherette with "synthetic" (fake) stitching on the door pannels which looked real nice, but is immediatly removed if option with ventilated seats (which I want), leaving a $60K+ car, with rubber/some cheap material all over the doors. I later researched the A4 vs S5 and found that even Car and Drive said the A4 was better than the S5 which was completely surprising, but proved what I had experienced. That being said, its off my list, I'm a hardcore enthusiast, and really want a 6 cylinder, especially if I am going to keep this car for a long period of time and spend my money on it, I want it how I would option it. I will say, one thing Audi got right was the technology, I love the virtual cockpit and all of the cool MMI technology. I'm planning on test driving a C43 in two weeks, and if I like it I will put it at the top of the list, BUT, I'm going to wait for the new 3 series which should be debuting later this year, and once I test drive both a C43, and the rumored new M340i, I will make my final decision. Thanks for all your replies and answers to my questions!

TLDR Version: Audi completely dissapoints me (other than tech) leaving C43 on the list with the next gen 3 series.
A4 can easily feel more dynamic than the S models due to the positioning of the engines in there cars. They are usually based off FWD chassis design which mean the entire motor is out infront of the front axle. This makes the car nose heavy and understeer. Audi has many trick solutions to dilute this experience but it's ultimately just masked (ie. sport rear diff, etc.)

A manual transmission can also drastically improve the "feeling" of a car due to being in direct control of the gear and power band. I've driven auto versions of cars back to back and the manuals just feel more spirited.

If buying an Audi, small displacement options are usually going to be better, but require modification to get to the higher tier of performance you are seeking.
Old 07-06-2018, 11:42 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
munis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,527
Received 284 Likes on 194 Posts
2021 Mercedes C63s AMG Coupe
Originally Posted by alexasa
A4 can easily feel more dynamic than the S models due to the positioning of the engines in there cars. They are usually based off FWD chassis design which mean the entire motor is out infront of the front axle. This makes the car nose heavy and understeer. Audi has many trick solutions to dilute this experience but it's ultimately just masked (ie. sport rear diff, etc.)

A manual transmission can also drastically improve the "feeling" of a car due to being in direct control of the gear and power band. I've driven auto versions of cars back to back and the manuals just feel more spirited.

If buying an Audi, small displacement options are usually going to be better, but require modification to get to the higher tier of performance you are seeking.
How are you liking the Audi so far?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: In the Market for a New Car



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.