C43 or C300? (expect to have baby)
The same magazine tested them both at the same time (1/4 mile):
Q60 RS - 13.3
C43 - 12.7
That's all that matters no matter how much Infiniti wants to inflate their numbers.
Just a sidenote: test drove an S5 sportback and a 2020 M340xi as well on the same roads. The Audi was poor, and just as bad as my 17 C43 while the BMW positively glided over that stretch of road, on non-runflat Michelin Pilot 4S. I think I am going to make the switch
Last edited by coladin; Sep 17, 2019 at 04:56 PM.

I am expecting a baby boy soon and I'm considering trading my C43 sedan for a C43 wagon, just for the ease of loading/unloading the stroller.
The same magazine tested them both at the same time (1/4 mile):
Q60 RS - 13.3
C43 - 12.7
That's all that matters no matter how much Infiniti wants to inflate their numbers.
There is no comparison in power. The RS is very fast in its own right but the C43 will pin you back in your seat like I have never experienced in the Q50. I didn't have the JB4 tune on my Q50 so can't comment on that front.
The Mercedes if the far superior car in every way. I don't mind the harsh ride and the performance seats are amazing. So much better than the sport seats I had in my Q50.
Only thing that sucks is I'm paying $300 more a month for this car but so far it's amazing and is worth every penny.
The same magazine tested them both at the same time (1/4 mile):
Q60 RS - 13.3
C43 - 12.7
That's all that matters no matter how much Infiniti wants to inflate their numbers.
Just a sidenote: test drove an S5 sportback and a 2020 M340xi as well on the same roads. The Audi was poor, and just as bad as my 17 C43 while the BMW positively glided over that stretch of road, on non-runflat Michelin Pilot 4S. I think I am going to make the switch
As someone who owns both a C450 and a GLC43, the GLC43 is a superior car for accessing the rear seats. There is much more room back there for ingress and egress. Also....stroller!!! Also, if you want to haul *** when the kid is not in the car the GLC43 is just as capable as the C43 on public roads. The ABC lowers and stabilizes body roll. It's very planted for a crossover and it's very quick when you mash the go pedal. You will only really notice the difference on body roll when driving with the suspension lifted for obstacles or when driving more aggressively than anyone should with a baby in the car. Downside is that the GLC is a bit more expensive.
Last edited by Mr. J; Sep 18, 2019 at 09:10 PM.
Just one guy's opinion, but I agree with everyone else here, c43 sedan is the way to go(don't make the coupe mistake with a baby... been down that road before and it's a nightmare).
EDIT: The further in to this thread I read, and after realizing where Jonathan is coming from, I can see the divide. To me, the c43 coupe / 440i don't make a lot of sense. These cars just make far more sense as a sports sedan. IMO they are a segment meant for those of us who love cars like the c63/M4, but grew up a bit and had kids and still want a sip from the AMG cup, but aren't looking to track the car.
Which is to say, I think it is perfect for a guy with a kid on the way. Sedan though, not the coupe.
Last edited by lindigj; Sep 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM.
Just one guy's opinion, but I agree with everyone else here, c43 sedan is the way to go(don't make the coupe mistake with a baby... been down that road before and it's a nightmare).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG






