C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

08 C63 vs. 08 M3 vs. 08 IS-F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-25-2007, 09:07 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by vraa
The Lexus doesn't have to be a better car.
The Mercedes and BMW just have to be worse.

Come on, the IS-F only comes with an 8 speed automatic -- how fun is that
8-speed is pointless.

I'd rate them close but like this as the Audi is the only one anyone has driven and we know it's a great. The other isn't out while the 63 is a long way off.
1. RS4
2. M3
3. C63

C63 will be very powerful. Lexus doesn't have the heritage as a sporting brand so should just give up.

Last edited by transferred; 04-25-2007 at 09:39 PM.
Old 04-26-2007, 07:44 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by m3_eater
I doubt that is true - but even if it is, the weight of the motor is only one of the factors in total running weight. The BMW is going to beat the other two in weight (and probably also power-to-weight ratio) hands down. The bar will be lifted for everyone, but don't expect any revelations. The three will stack up the same as the competitors do now.
You can doubt it ,but it is true! An how do you know how much the M3 weighs vs the C63?


AMG 6.3L V8
Cylinder arrangement
v8
Cylinder angle
90 degrees
Valves per cylinder
4
Displacement
6208
Bore/stroke
102.2/98.6
Dist. between cylinders
109mm
Compression ratio
11.3:1
Output
375kw/510hp@6800 rpm
Output per litre
60.4kw/82.1hp
Max torque
630nm@3200
Torque per litre
101.5 Nm
Maximum engine speed
7200 rpm
Weight (dry)
199kg

Power-to-weight ratio
1.88 kW/kg



M3 V8
4 litre V8
420 bhp / 8300 rpm
max 8400 rpm
400 Nm at 3900 rpm
340 Nm at 2000 rpm
comp 12:1
engine weight 202 kg


# 26 lb heavier than 335i engine!
# 84 lb lighter than M5 S85
# 15 kg less than the M3 E46 engine


The big 6.3L motor weighs 3 kg's less than BMW's 4.0l V8.

Last edited by ProjectC55; 04-26-2007 at 07:52 PM.
Old 04-26-2007, 07:48 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
Bif powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2002 c32
I've always wondered why the M3 doesn't get put up against the CLK - isn't that more it's class/type? Really the M3 shouldn't be in this group (4-door super sedans) but the RS4 should be I imagine.
Old 04-26-2007, 09:46 PM
  #29  
Member
 
ralleyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C32 and 2009 Audi S5
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
Nope the M3 motor is actually heavier than the Audi 4.2L V8 and the AMG 6.3L motor.
My nephew just went for a spin in the new as yet unreleased m3 (best friend's dad owns several BMW dealerships and somehow got a hold of one) and said the handling has taken a step backward because the v8 is heavy up front. He was severely disappointed and is a BMW lover.
Old 04-26-2007, 10:55 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
 
rhernand07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So with all that said, those that mean that a moded C55 will beat the new M3??
Old 04-26-2007, 11:09 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by rhernand07
So with all that said, those that mean that a moded C55 will beat the new M3??
on a track...no way unless it's been modded for exclusive track use
Old 04-26-2007, 11:47 PM
  #32  
Member
 
dorikin_86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Renntech C class
Originally Posted by ralleyone
My nephew just went for a spin in the new as yet unreleased m3 (best friend's dad owns several BMW dealerships and somehow got a hold of one) and said the handling has taken a step backward because the v8 is heavy up front. He was severely disappointed and is a BMW lover.
the new v8 is 35lbs lighter than the inline 6.

bmw's handling has taken a step backwards since they start packing in SO much weight into the E36. E30 M3 is still the best driver's car out of the M3's but don't get me started on the C55.....you havne't experiened front heavy until you've driven one of these =)
Old 04-27-2007, 06:37 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by rhernand07
So with all that said, those that mean that a moded C55 will beat the new M3??
I would not be suprised if this were possible.
Old 04-27-2007, 06:42 AM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by dorikin_86
the new v8 is 35lbs lighter than the inline 6.

bmw's handling has taken a step backwards since they start packing in SO much weight into the E36. E30 M3 is still the best driver's car out of the M3's but don't get me started on the C55.....you havne't experiened front heavy until you've driven one of these =)
The front heavy thing with the M113 motors in the "c" and the "CLK's" is overrated. When it comes to the C36 and the C43 especially the straight six is heavier. The M113 motor is all aluminum and nowhere near as heavy as you think.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:16 AM
  #35  
Member
 
dorikin_86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Diamond Bar
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Renntech C class
that could be true...i haven't driven a C36 or C43 =)

I just wished car manufacturers would pursue power-to-weight ratio more than just MORE power because weight kills everything in a sports car/sedan.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:39 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fifth Ring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Germancar1
I think it will the same old story, Mercedes will be the most powerful, fastest and easiest to live with everyday. The BMW will be the better handling, come with a manual trans and provide that connection that the Benz doesn't. The Lexus will be fast and all too isolated and totally lacking in "sport", but reliability survey worshipers who have a pulse will love it.

M
Sums it up. Of course NONE of us have driven ANY of these cars, and it is all about personal preference. Drive them and buy the one you like best.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:45 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by ralleyone
My nephew just went for a spin in the new as yet unreleased m3 (best friend's dad owns several BMW dealerships and somehow got a hold of one) and said the handling has taken a step backward because the v8 is heavy up front. He was severely disappointed and is a BMW lover.
BS. The V8 is lighter than the I6. Stop making stuff up. The E92 M3 employs multiple weight saving techniques.
Old 04-27-2007, 03:18 PM
  #38  
Super Member
 
m3_eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
BS. The V8 is lighter than the I6. Stop making stuff up. The E92 M3 employs multiple weight saving techniques.
You and ProjectC55 should get a room. Lighter engine does not mean lighter total car! The dimensions of the 3-series have grown with each successive generation, just as the competition have also grown fatter. More features, more weight. The E92 3-series weighs more than the E46, which weighs more than the E36, which weighs more than the E30. I am a HUGE BMW fan, always have been - but there is no way they are going to produce a 2700-lb 3-series again. We have to wait for the 135i to find a spiritual successor to the 2002 and E30.
Old 04-27-2007, 03:26 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Okay so every successive generation gets fatter (in this case we'll really have to wait and see), I'll agree with that, but the assertion that the V8 has made the car front-heavy is nothing short of total BS. First of all every ///M car is 50/50 balanced, and second of all this lump is even lighter than the previous engine. Like I said no one has even seen a production version of this car, and anyone who's taken a drive in the concept, as unlikely as it sounds to me, still doesn't know what the production version will hold.

E92 335i curb weight- 3593 pounds.
E46 M3 curb weight- 3415 pounds.

Hypothetically, and this is very hypothetical, with the weight savings of the engine and the CF roof, the E92 M3 should weigh VERY CLOSE to what the outgoing M3 weighs, with a huge power advantage.
Old 05-02-2007, 06:22 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by m3_eater
You and ProjectC55 should get a room. Lighter engine does not mean lighter total car! .
Hey Sunshine! I said that the 6.3L motor was actually lighter than the 4.0L V8 that BMW was putting in the new M3 and gave you proof because your assumption was WRONG! I never said anything else about the weight of these cars which would definitely be a factor. So stop trying to scratch someone's eye's out!
Old 07-04-2007, 10:16 AM
  #41  
Almost a Member!
 
mbSLRwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 SLK55 AMG Iridium Silver
the torque advantage is HUGE for the c63, compared to the e92 m3. 443 ft/lbs compared to 295 ft/lbs... that's a huge difference.
Old 07-04-2007, 01:25 PM
  #42  
Almost a Member!
 
foofighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The OC
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i find it funny that all the discussions of the competition...i havent come up on one that has the Audi RS4 as competition. it's kind of sad, it's such a capable car but the RS4 is the chubby kid that no one picks to be on their team only as a last resort.
Old 07-04-2007, 02:05 PM
  #43  
Super Member
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14 'E550
Originally Posted by transferred
C63 will be very powerful. Lexus doesn't have the heritage as a sporting brand so should just give up.
What kind of car enthusiast are you? Not much of one with that attitude.

It is never too late for a car company to get into the performance game. Nobody has tested the IS-F yet, which has the 8spd autoshift and over 400hp (most likely around 420hp give or take).

Caddy was never a sporting company either and look at what they have been up to. The 09 CTS-V is rumored to be 500hp AWD and wouldn't be surprised if the # was over 500hp. Granted the last CTS-V wasn't the most polished vehicle, but it certainly held its own performance wise against the E46 M3 and S4.

Competition = Good for the enthusiast.

Last edited by Beltfed; 07-04-2007 at 02:29 PM.
Old 07-04-2007, 02:25 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by foofighter
i find it funny that all the discussions of the competition...i havent come up on one that has the Audi RS4 as competition. it's kind of sad, it's such a capable car but the RS4 is the chubby kid that no one picks to be on their team only as a last resort.
My friend has an RS4 and it is an amazing vehicle. The C63 and E90 M3 will have to be very good to usurp it as class leader.

It may not win to many highway drags, but in the compact sector straightline performance has never been the be-all and end-all. The RS4 is supremely focused with 8-piston brakes, an 8,250 red line and 420ps from a NA 4.2 V8. It's chuckable and tracks like a Carrera and I doubt that will be the case with the Lexus which has failure written all over it.
Old 07-04-2007, 02:32 PM
  #45  
Super Member
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14 'E550
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
It's chuckable and tracks like a Carrera and I doubt that will be the case with the Lexus which has failure written all over it.
How do you know it will be a failure?

Nobody has driven it yet, do you know winning lotto numbers in advance as well?
Old 07-04-2007, 09:10 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by Beltfed
How do you know it will be a failure?

Nobody has driven it yet, do you know winning lotto numbers in advance as well?
I said "doubt" not "know", sunshine.
Old 07-04-2007, 10:16 PM
  #47  
Member
 
MikTrebla09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seoul / Boston
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
h
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
My friend has an RS4 and it is an amazing vehicle. The C63 and E90 M3 will have to be very good to usurp it as class leader.

It may not win to many highway drags, but in the compact sector straightline performance has never been the be-all and end-all. The RS4 is supremely focused with 8-piston brakes, an 8,250 red line and 420ps from a NA 4.2 V8. It's chuckable and tracks like a Carrera and I doubt that will be the case with the Lexus which has failure written all over it.
http://www.caranddriver.com/assets/d..._theresult.pdf

Old 07-04-2007, 10:52 PM
  #48  
Super Member
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14 'E550
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
I said "doubt" not "know", sunshine.
Its not the "doubt"....its the "has failure written all over it."

That's extreme language for a car that hasn't been tested yet. On paper, the car has the goods. Not to mention, its Lexus 1st stab at a dedicated performance model. So, its not like we can go by past models to judge what this might be like and what to expect.
Old 07-04-2007, 11:22 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Militant-Grunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
I think it really depends on the categories you guys are talking about

Track Vs 1/4 mile? BMW for sure for the track while benz will take the 1/4. Handling will always just be better on a BMW, especially an M3.
Old 07-05-2007, 01:02 AM
  #50  
Member
 
gixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 148
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Boxster
Originally Posted by Bif powell
I've always wondered why the M3 doesn't get put up against the CLK - isn't that more it's class/type? Really the M3 shouldn't be in this group (4-door super sedans) but the RS4 should be I imagine.
I don't but but this time there will be both E90 and E92 M3's out.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 08 C63 vs. 08 M3 vs. 08 IS-F



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.