C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

08 C63 vs. 08 M3 vs. 08 IS-F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-24-2007, 09:34 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
danrad40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 C63 vs. 08 M3 vs. 08 IS-F

I see a comparison test coming that will include the listed autos. From what I've read all the cars will have 400 plus HP. I'm leaning towards the new C63 as a favorite with the new 6.3. I know the BMW will be a contender though and the Lexus will not be far behind. What does everyone think?
Old 04-24-2007, 11:03 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
turbo16lbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1991 Toyota MR2, 2002 C32 AMG
I may be a little biased but I think C63 is going to destroy all of these cars. Ok fine not destroy but it'll perform slightly better. I don't know the numbers in curb weight on the IS-F but I think it's going to be a cow. I wish the C63 had some form of forced induction like the C32 or E55's. Heck, the 335i's with that Vishnu thing can make most 400hp cars have a run for their money.
Old 04-25-2007, 03:20 AM
  #3  
Almost a Member!
 
cheungster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
02' C32 Amg
I think the real comparison is going to come down to the c63 and the m3. The IS-F looks kind of goofy to me . From what i've read, it seems like the c63 power will be a bit better than both the m3 and IS-F. I'm really curious to see how they're going to tune the c63 suspension...
Old 04-25-2007, 05:20 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
C63 > M3 > Is-f

The C63 should beat both of them EASILY, shouldn't it???
To my understanding, the C63 will have 475 hp while M3 will have 410 and IS-F will get 400 hp. So the C63 will have at LEAST 60 more horsepower... Am I missing something here?

I think the C63 should easily come out on top. And wait until aftermarket tuners re-tune the engine back to 507 hp and maybe even more...
Old 04-25-2007, 06:29 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
The C63 should beat both of them EASILY, shouldn't it???
To my understanding, the C63 will have 475 hp while M3 will have 410 and IS-F will get 400 hp. So the C63 will have at LEAST 60 more horsepower... Am I missing something here?

I think the C63 should easily come out on top. And wait until aftermarket tuners re-tune the engine back to 507 hp and maybe even more...
In theory,maybe! But we'll have to wait and see.
Old 04-25-2007, 06:59 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
I think it will the same old story, Mercedes will be the most powerful, fastest and easiest to live with everyday. The BMW will be the better handling, come with a manual trans and provide that connection that the Benz doesn't. The Lexus will be fast and all too isolated and totally lacking in "sport", but reliability survey worshipers who have a pulse will love it.

M
Old 04-25-2007, 08:54 AM
  #7  
Member
 
eugeneC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W221
Originally Posted by Germancar1
I think it will the same old story, Mercedes will be the most powerful, fastest and easiest to live with everyday. The BMW will be the better handling, come with a manual trans and provide that connection that the Benz doesn't. The Lexus will be fast and all too isolated and totally lacking in "sport", but reliability survey worshipers who have a pulse will love it.

M
+1
Old 04-25-2007, 09:01 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Bench racing before any of the cars are even released is

Also, don't know what you guys read but the C63 is said to have something in the 450 area.
Old 04-25-2007, 09:04 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
C43AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
98 Black C43 , 08' ML320 CDI ,11 E63
Originally Posted by Germancar1
I think it will the same old story, Mercedes will be the most powerful, fastest and easiest to live with everyday. The BMW will be the better handling, come with a manual trans and provide that connection that the Benz doesn't. The Lexus will be fast and all too isolated and totally lacking in "sport", but reliability survey worshipers who have a pulse will love it.

M
^ + 2 ....and the Lexus' brakes will probably suck.
Old 04-25-2007, 10:04 AM
  #10  
SPONSOR
 
sales@eurocharged.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,909
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
C63S
My money is on the less powerful M3 from 0-60 and 1/4 mile.

However, the C63 will be easily modded to the full power of the motor.

"In keeping with BMW's high-revving "M" tradition, maximum engine speed is 8,300 rpm. The engine is the lightest V8 in the world, weighing less than the previous M3's inline-six."

Better keep an eye on the weight of the M3....we might be surprised with the power to weight ratio.

Last edited by sales@eurocharged.com; 04-25-2007 at 10:08 AM.
Old 04-25-2007, 10:07 AM
  #11  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by C43AMG
^ + 2 ....and the Lexus' brakes will probably suck.
Compared to.... ?
As if the C32's are any better? Have you read MBenzNL's post on them?

You can get a C63. You can get a M3.
But with 1000 IS-F's, good luck trying to get one of those
Old 04-25-2007, 10:30 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
C43AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
98 Black C43 , 08' ML320 CDI ,11 E63
Originally Posted by vraa
But with 1000 IS-F's, good luck trying to get one of those
Why would I want a car that is 3rd place of a 3 car race ?
Old 04-25-2007, 10:34 AM
  #13  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Hm, not sure, mainly because none of the three cars are for sale yet and there haven't been any head to head to head reviews yet -- so as far as any of us are concerned, you could be buying the fastest car in the world (well, not any of us, I bet you're a Lexus engineer trying to bait me ).
Old 04-25-2007, 10:37 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 542 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by vraa
Hm, not sure, mainly because none of the three cars are for sale yet and there haven't been any head to head to head reviews yet -- so as far as any of us are concerned, you could be buying the fastest car in the world (well, not any of us, I bet you're a Lexus engineer trying to bait me ).
This entire argument is ghey. This thread is ghey. Nobody has driven any of these cars, they could all suck for all we know.
Old 04-25-2007, 10:37 AM
  #15  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
This entire argument is ghey. This thread is ghey. Nobody has driven any of these cars, they could all suck for all we know.
To BMW's credit, the M3 always manages to be C&D's benchmark...
Old 04-25-2007, 10:51 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
C43AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
98 Black C43 , 08' ML320 CDI ,11 E63
Originally Posted by vraa
Hm, not sure, mainly because none of the three cars are for sale yet and there haven't been any head to head to head reviews yet -- so as far as any of us are concerned, you could be buying the fastest car in the world (well, not any of us, I bet you're a Lexus engineer trying to bait me ).
Ricky.......put down your Lexus pom-poms....they're getting better, but they are not there yet.
Old 04-25-2007, 11:06 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
the 3 cars should be a handful...........the lexus should not be in for repairs even minor compared to the other two. i like all three but have to say the m3 in sedan version is the ticket for me. the best is the lexus will cost less and imagine the tuners that will bump up the power on that 400hp+ v8. its unique and we will fear that car(lexus) down the road if we see it. to be honest i am leaning heavily to quality and gadgets more which is almost guarranteed in the lexus compared to the other two. i see keeping my c32 for another year or two when the prices on the c63,m3 and the ls-f are more of a bargain. though i feel the lexus will be the preferred.
Old 04-25-2007, 11:12 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by AMG-Jerry
My money is on the less powerful M3 from 0-60 and 1/4 mile.

However, the C63 will be easily modded to the full power of the motor.

"In keeping with BMW's high-revving "M" tradition, maximum engine speed is 8,300 rpm. The engine is the lightest V8 in the world, weighing less than the previous M3's inline-six."

Better keep an eye on the weight of the M3....we might be surprised with the power to weight ratio.
Nope the M3 motor is actually heavier than the Audi 4.2L V8 and the AMG 6.3L motor.
Old 04-25-2007, 11:29 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Blk04cobra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 S430, 2004 Cobra, 2004 Tahoe
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
The C63 should beat both of them EASILY, shouldn't it???
To my understanding, the C63 will have 475 hp while M3 will have 410 and IS-F will get 400 hp. So the C63 will have at LEAST 60 more horsepower... Am I missing something here?

I think the C63 should easily come out on top. And wait until aftermarket tuners re-tune the engine back to 507 hp and maybe even more...
I agree, but you know how Motor Trend and Automobile love BMW
Old 04-25-2007, 12:41 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Eurowow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SF
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amg C32
Originally Posted by Germancar1
I think it will the same old story, Mercedes will be the most powerful, fastest and easiest to live with everyday. The BMW will be the better handling, come with a manual trans and provide that connection that the Benz doesn't. The Lexus will be fast and all too isolated and totally lacking in "sport", but reliability survey worshipers who have a pulse will love it.

M
yep agreed
Old 04-25-2007, 12:46 PM
  #21  
spr
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
spr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will be interesting to see how up to date the nav versions are when they're released, e.g. if they have the traffic updates etc.
Old 04-25-2007, 12:47 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 C32
Originally Posted by spr
It will be interesting to see how up to date the nav versions are when they're released, e.g. if they have the traffic updates etc.
The Lexus obviously will. Who knows on the other two. The Germans are usually two generations behind on Navi. The C63 will prob have the Navi from the new S-class, which is already one generation behind.
Old 04-25-2007, 01:49 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
m3_eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
Nope the M3 motor is actually heavier than the Audi 4.2L V8 and the AMG 6.3L motor.
I doubt that is true - but even if it is, the weight of the motor is only one of the factors in total running weight. The BMW is going to beat the other two in weight (and probably also power-to-weight ratio) hands down. The bar will be lifted for everyone, but don't expect any revelations. The three will stack up the same as the competitors do now.
Old 04-25-2007, 04:31 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
gkstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG - in Pewter
In a three way review, C&D placed E63 first and M5 third (10 cylinders high revving, but...) in their class. I am sooo curious for this one to come out.

Last edited by gkstar; 04-25-2007 at 04:34 PM.
Old 04-25-2007, 04:35 PM
  #25  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by C43AMG
Ricky.......put down your Lexus pom-poms....they're getting better, but they are not there yet.
The Lexus doesn't have to be a better car.
The Mercedes and BMW just have to be worse.

Come on, the IS-F only comes with an 8 speed automatic -- how fun is that


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 08 C63 vs. 08 M3 vs. 08 IS-F



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.