C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Nissan GTR vs C63?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-19-2007, 10:23 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fifth Ring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Flash Gordon
Now, the Skyline is a limited production, high performance car that will turn heads wherever it goes. People will ask themselves, what's that!
Those same people (non-car-enthusiasts) would have the same reaction to this:



WHAT'S THAT???
Old 12-19-2007, 12:16 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
360_iti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W203, W211, W219, W212
Originally Posted by Flash Gordon
There is NOTHING prestigeous owning a MB! It's dime a dozen on the streets in Jersey and NYC.
Not everyone lives in Jersey and NYC. In most parts of the country (and the world) MB is still associated with prestige, even in Socal. It's the brand that attention-***** celebrities prefer. Pay attention to Hollywood movies, what kind of car do characters of higher profile drive? Mercedes-Benz. The director could choose any make they want, but when it comes to prestige, most of the times it comes down to MB. And don’t argue by saying it’s just in movies, because movie directors always take clues and facts from the reality to a certain extent. Maybe the standard in Jersey is so high, it’s dime a dozen on the streets, but I don’t think in this case Jersey is a legitimate value to be used for generalization. My 02.

However, I do agree with you that most people would'nt recognize the C63 from a regular C. The majority of people would recognize it as a 4-door Benz, and then a smaller group would recognize it as the C class. And then an even smaller group would recognize it as the C63.
Old 12-19-2007, 01:52 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Jspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore/Central London UK
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63 biturbo
CHeck this out!

Full test

And this:

Suzuka Lap times


It just keeps getting better and better ... Can't wait for mine to arrive!
Old 12-19-2007, 01:58 PM
  #29  
Member
 
brabusw209amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 V10, 2 V8
i am going to nissan right now and leave a deposit
Old 12-19-2007, 02:14 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fifth Ring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
I've had a personal revelation about cars like the GTR. In order to get any use out of the car's obvious capabilities, you need to take it to the track -- something I'm familiar with. If you don't take it to the track, you're either wasting your money, or street racing. Stupid either way.

But if you're using that car to its potential at a track, you're putting the car and yourself at significant risk. It's crazy fast. You'd be going 150+ down the front and back straights at VIR. Without a roll cage, race seats or harnesses, that's just not wise. Even if you're OK with the personal risk, at those speeds, mistakes are unforgiving to say the least.

It all gives me a greater understanding of, and appreciation for, AMG as the "street-driver's supercar." Plenty of HP, decent handling, great brakes and a comfortable interior. I like my current setup alot. AMG for the daily driver and a cheap beater for the track.
Old 12-19-2007, 03:10 PM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
Walla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Spain
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DanielVotTF
Skyline vs C63...

That is saying

Buigatti Veyron vs 911 Turbo...

Both are great, but honestly it is silly...

GTR if u wanna be a rice Rocket man, C63 if u want a car that can take you home in comfort and rip our face off.
Old 12-19-2007, 04:31 PM
  #32  
Super Member
 
EV0LVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F10
The GTR is a car-guy's car, just brute horsepower, just look at it's target a Porsche TURBO, it will leave the C63 in the dust, and is it a soup'd-up Z, yes, to somebody who doesn't know what a GTR is . It's gonna be an awesome car, just wait 'til the real tuners get ahold of it.
Old 12-19-2007, 05:03 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by Jspeed
CHeck this out!

Full test

And this:

Suzuka Lap times


It just keeps getting better and better ... Can't wait for mine to arrive!

That's sick fast.



"We know you want the numbers and we're not going to waste your time. Neither is Nissan. Its 2009 GT-R hits 60 mph in 3.3 seconds, quicker than the last Dodge Viper, Corvette Z06 and Porsche 911 Turbo we tested. Keep your foot pinned, and after another tap on the upshift paddle it will clear the quarter-mile in 11.6 seconds at more than 120 mph. "




But the new 'vette looks really fast too.


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ook/index.html

Last edited by chiphomme; 12-19-2007 at 05:28 PM.
Old 12-19-2007, 06:15 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fifth Ring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by RedW203
The GTR is a car-guy's car, just brute horsepower, just look at it's target a Porsche TURBO, it will leave the C63 in the dust, and is it a soup'd-up Z, yes, to somebody who doesn't know what a GTR is . It's gonna be an awesome car, just wait 'til the real tuners get ahold of it.
It's simple:

G35 = Glorified 350Z
GTR = REALLY Glorified 350Z
Audi = Glorified VW
Old 12-19-2007, 06:42 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,792
Received 236 Likes on 183 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
These are two different classes of cars. In the small sedan segment, the C63 flat out overpowers and outperforms all of its competition. The 2DR GTR would be better compared to a CLK63 (even though AMG only offers the coupe overseas to pump up Black Series sales over here). Once forced induction becomes an option for the 6.2 Liter, you are going to see even tuned GTR's having trouble keeping up.
Old 12-19-2007, 06:53 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes on 368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by HLG600
These are two different classes of cars. In the small sedan segment, the C63 flat out overpowers and outperforms all of its competition. The 2DR GTR would be better compared to a CLK63 (even though AMG only offers the coupe overseas to pump up Black Series sales over here). Once forced induction becomes an option for the 6.2 Liter, you are going to see even tuned GTR's having trouble keeping up.
I wouldn't be so sure of that. Sure there will be chip and exhaust tuning for the 6.2TT, but that'll be the extent of it kids. Very few people will hack up an AMG engine, but I happen to know of a few turbo kits in development for the GTR ALREADY. You will see 1,000hp GTR's on the street well before you see a 6.2 AMG even approaching those numbers.

As far as comparing the GTR to the C63, well they're not even in the same class and have completely different drivetrains and philosophies behind them, but performance-wise, there isn't any comparison. The GTR outstrips the C63 in every category, it's better compared to Porsche TT's and Z06's, more so the Z06. And don't even get into the "well you can bring the C63 up to 550hp" because you can do far more to the GTR's VR lump for far less money.

Last edited by Cylinder Head; 12-19-2007 at 06:56 PM.
Old 12-19-2007, 07:26 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
GTR over the C63 all the way!!!!!! How could anyone try to compare the two especially performance wise. HP mods for the GTR will well exceed any hp mods for the C63!

PS the interior of the GTR is nothing like and will be nothing like the plastic interior of the 350Z.
Well if I was rich and kept the GTR in the garage for show and paying a hefty insurance prem. No fool drives that everyday. But my current stat the C63 looks good for me.
Old 12-19-2007, 07:46 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
rays cl55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 90254
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 E55
Originally Posted by Fifth Ring
It's simple:

G35 = Glorified 350Z
GTR = REALLY Glorified 350Z
Audi = Glorified VW
are you serious?
Old 12-19-2007, 07:57 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by Fifth Ring
It's simple:

G35 = Glorified 350Z
GTR = REALLY Glorified 350Z
Audi = Glorified VW
Hmmm Hate to think what you'd think of the C32! Glorified C320!
Old 12-19-2007, 10:00 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
360_iti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W203, W211, W219, W212
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
And don't even get into the "well you can bring the C63 up to 550hp" because you can do far more to the GTR's VR lump for far less money.
+1
Spend 2 grand on an AMG and you get an additional 50hp/50 tq. Spend 2 grand on a Jap car and you'll race the big boys.
Old 12-19-2007, 11:30 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bensitto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 1,336
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
S550, R350, GL550, ML63 AMG
I think its more like spend $800 on a ECU reflash for a potential 550 HP, almost 100HP gain.

I've heard people on the boards saying that the 63 engine was a stepping stone for the TT 63 engine. If and when that does happen we'll be seeing stock 700+HP benzes...

Anyway, it's going to be fun watching these 2 cars go head to head. The benz has a little more torque, the GTR has a little more HP.

Old 12-20-2007, 01:46 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
lexaltezza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 CLS63
Have any of you seen the latest Edmunds.com review of the GTR? If not, here is the link: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1#2

0-60= 3.3 seconds
1/4 mile= 11.6 seconds

The c63 can't and never will compare performance wise for you optimist believers.
Old 12-20-2007, 02:42 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
iguess's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CLK350
i think we all agree this is a great car. its just that 1/2 the people cant get over the nissan brand. i think its going to be a while before most people will accept that japanese cars can be luxury cars too
Old 12-20-2007, 09:25 AM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fifth Ring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by iguess
i think we all agree this is a great car. its just that 1/2 the people cant get over the nissan brand. i think its going to be a while before most people will accept that japanese cars can be luxury cars too
I think plenty of folks are convinced that Lexus and Infiniti build great (Japanese) cars (luxury). But putting a pricey supercar under a Nissan banner is an interesting choice. They could have marketed it as an Infiniti. Remember when VW sold a super-sedan (Phaeton) next to Beetles and Golfs? How did that turn out? I think this will turn out better since the GTR is a progression from the 350Z and not such a logical leap.

My guess is that Nissan examined the decision to sell the NSX under the Acura name rather than Honda.

Last edited by Fifth Ring; 12-20-2007 at 09:30 AM.
Old 12-20-2007, 11:29 AM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
360_iti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W203, W211, W219, W212
Originally Posted by bensitto
I've heard people on the boards saying that the 63 engine was a stepping stone for the TT 63 engine. If and when that does happen we'll be seeing stock 700+HP benzes...
That's what I believe. Putting an FI is a no brainer for them. Tranny is another story and my guess is they're currently working on it. It takes a little bit of R&D to come up with a whole new gearing system to be able to handle that much of power and more. Like I said in another post, I'm curious to learn what they're planning for the upcoming W212 AMG. Fun stuff.
Old 12-20-2007, 12:35 PM
  #46  
Super Member
 
gnma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'12 Mustang 5.0, '89 Supra Turbo, C55,
I saw this post, and thought, "here we go, bashing on Nissan", but I was pleasantly surprised to read the comments here. MB owners telling it like it is. Really cool IMO. I've never seen a forum where owners really respect other cars in such quantity, and this is a MB forum of all forums!! (It shows the quality and knowledge of the owners).

If I had to choose bet. the 2, it would be the Skyline. The TT Supra came with a 320 hp engine that owners PROVED (already done, NOT speculation, or rumours) was good for 650 hp stock. I would imagine the Skyline too will be overengineered the same way. And as some may say "boy racer image" etc, we all know there is no replacement for power. That's why MB has AMG, BMW has the M division etc. The Skyline will offer incredible power, and no matter what, no 4 door sedan will ever give the feeling that a true sports car can, and that's the bottom line IMO.
Old 12-20-2007, 05:58 PM
  #47  
Almost a Member!
 
CoupeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 CLK320, 2003 Hyundai Elantra GT
Originally Posted by Flash Gordon
There is NOTHING prestigeous owning a MB! It's dime a dozen on the streets in Jersey and NYC. Heck, most people would'nt recognize the C63 from a regular C. Now, the Skyline is a limited production, high performance car that will turn heads wherever it goes. People will ask themselves, what's that! I orginally considered of getting the the C63, but after knowing what a gas hog it is (10mpg), and knowing that MB will tag on everything as an option, the Skyline offers better value AND performance. The Skyline really should not be compared to the C63 because they are totally different cars. Skyline should be compared to the Corvette and other sports cars, not the C63. I just wonder how much premium the Nissan dealer will charge.
Considering the fact that I live in New York now, I understand where you are coming from, but I was referring to self gratification instead of others determining what is "prestigious." As far as people not knowing the difference, who cares, it's not like an "average" person would say "Hey, look at the new Nissan Skyline driving down the street." I think they would say, "Wow, that's a Nissan," but once they see the sticker price, it would be "who would pay $75k for a Nissan"...the average person doesn't know what a Skyline is and what it offers.

But either way, they both are great cars, but in two different markets C63 = M3...Skyline = Vette/Viper.
Old 12-20-2007, 08:36 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by lexaltezza
Have any of you seen the latest Edmunds.com review of the GTR? If not, here is the link: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1#2

0-60= 3.3 seconds
1/4 mile= 11.6 seconds

The c63 can't and never will compare performance wise for you optimist believers.
Thanks to AWD. But from a roll the GTR wont be much quicker then the c63.
Old 12-20-2007, 10:01 PM
  #49  
Super Member
 
ndabunka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No longer car shopping...
Well, the C63 is a Merc so you can pretty much COUNT on about a 40% reduction in value (called depreciation) in 2 years. The GT-R is a limited production product (i.e. rare). They are both the same price. Which one do YOU all think will hold it's value better? The mass overly-produced C63 or the restrictive GT-R? Here's a hint, although the GT-R is not yet available here, the price tag is set right at $70K (base line model is $68,400 and premium is $71,900). The first one has already been resold as a used car for.............$95K.

It's like anything else, demand and supply. Nissan gets it. Benz won't be restricting any C63's. As the saying goes, when everyone can get one, no one is special.
Old 12-20-2007, 10:12 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
lexaltezza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 CLS63
Originally Posted by ndabunka
Well, the C63 is a Merc so you can pretty much COUNT on about a 40% reduction in value (called depreciation) in 2 years. The GT-R is a limited production product (i.e. rare). They are both the same price. Which one do YOU all think will hold it's value better? The mass overly-produced C63 or the restrictive GT-R? Here's a hint, although the GT-R is not yet available here, the price tag is set right at $70K (base line model is $68,400 and premium is $71,900). The first one has already been resold as a used car for.............$95K.

It's like anything else, demand and supply. Nissan gets it. Benz won't be restricting any C63's. As the saying goes, when everyone can get one, no one is special.
I thought I remember reading somewhere that the GTR will be mass produced on a yearly basis...


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Nissan GTR vs C63?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 PM.