Amg 6.2 Engine Issue ... Interesting
I just joined the forum and am expecting the arrival of my c63 (iridium silver / black) in mid may. Here is an interesting question that came up in a conversation the other day, maybe someone can answer it.
Why is there such a difference in HP between all of the AMG 6.2 engines?
I.E.
C63 ... 451hp
CLK63 ... 475hp
ML63 ... 503hp
E63 ... 507hp
CLS63 ... 507hp
S63 ... 518hp
CL63 ... 518hp
So where is the difference in power coming from? More restrictive exhaust? Different engine mapping? Difference intake? Different cooling system?
There are a few exceptions,as noted:
C63 ... 451hp-restricted output due to size limitations for exhaust,intake etc
CLK63 ... 475hp again,due to chassis design dual exhaust wont fit;less hp
ML63 ... 503hp
E63 ... 507hp
CLS63 ... 507hp
S63 ... 518hp
CL63 ... 518hp
You forgot the CLK63 Black Series;but with the exception of the C63&CLK63 all the 6.2l AMG engines make the SAME hp,just about 510@the crank & 420hp at the wheels.
It's been discussed to great detail in the W211 forum concerning the E55,SL55,S,CL55 etc. M-B listed some 55K engines as 469hp and others as 493hp when in fact they all dyno the same....
Welcome to the forum
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Re-mapping a naturally aspirated engine is not as rewarding as a boosted engine,you can easily gain 80+hp from remapping a V12tt AMG,not so much on our N/A engines
I myself had nothing but pinging issues, with my 07 CLK63 with 91 oct fuel.
Very recently I blended 101oct racing fuel to bring it up to 96 oct, there is day and night difference in the responsiveness, pulls much harder to the top and not to mention pinging disappeared.
This weekend I will have my car dynode with higher oct fuel that is still in it, and following week with pump gas, and I would not be surprised there is 20-30 RWH loss on pump gas.
I believe MB is tuning the 6.2 motor down to avoid detonation problems and still claming 507 on some cars and 451 on the later models.
onofew: An example would be that the 6.2l engine senses Intake Air Temperature & adjusts(pulls) timing as needed to avoid detonation.Increasing the octane will raise the threshold where the I.A.T. sensor will allow full timing advance&therefore allow full power to be delivered.
VRP includes instructions on re-locating the I.A.T sensor w it's VRP550kit,this proved it was worth a few HP
IMO the 6.2l (being that its a 4 valve per cyl. w a relatively high redline) engine likes to breathe,so I see the biggest bump in HP coming from equal length headers,full free-flowing exhaust,larger cams,headwork,etc.
But that equals tens of thousands of dollars so it's not for everyone,especially me

My aplogies if this doesn't make sense;I'm half asleep thanx to a lovely Ambien CR&having a difficult time conveying my thoughts
Last edited by oldgixxer; Apr 2, 2008 at 09:22 PM.
I just joined the forum and am expecting the arrival of my c63 (iridium silver / black) in mid may. Here is an interesting question that came up in a conversation the other day, maybe someone can answer it.
Why is there such a difference in HP between all of the AMG 6.2 engines?
I.E.
C63 ... 451hp
CLK63 ... 475hp
ML63 ... 503hp
E63 ... 507hp
CLS63 ... 507hp
S63 ... 518hp
CL63 ... 518hp
So where is the difference in power coming from? More restrictive exhaust? Different engine mapping? Difference intake? Different cooling system?
This is a quote from our friends at VRP Performance Tuning. These guys really know the AMG M156 engine.
"Although AMG rates the M156 engine from 475hp in the CLK63 to 518hp in the S63, in reality this engine is right around 505hp, as all cars make close to 420hp at the wheels (420/0.83 = 506hp)."
They have also recently uncovered that the timing difference between the S63 and CLK63 shows that the CLK has been retarded by 3-4 Degrees. I think this is a very plausible place to look for HP differences.
Personally I think with a better Hi-Flow air filter Vs the "suffocating" stock charcoal filters and a little ECU tweak and the C63 will get to 500+hp very easily. Go a little further and add some Phenolic Heat Spacers and a couple of UD pulleys and 530hp may be a reality for the C63. Not a large $ investment (contrary to other thoughts) to get there either. Time will tell
I can't wait!!!
Last edited by NORTH 44 C63; Apr 2, 2008 at 10:28 PM.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the injectors, no abnormal internal friction, neither the car is throwing any codes. According to MB service dpt my car’s timing is on the money.
Maybe it just the way my version of the ECU is programmed to manage the motor this way
With 91oct pump gas I can feel the timing backing off within it’s parameters and still pinging.
I’m convinced that MB became aware this problem and they have updated their ECUs on later models.
Seat of pants the difference can be felt in my car.
The only way I’ll be able to substantiate what I’m trying tell you guys is to run back to back dyno pulls. How much RWH will I make with pump gas? 360-380 or it will actually pull 410-420 range as it’s been dynode on other 63 models. Also how much gain can be achieved with higher octane fuel?
So my point is MB is very inconsistent with the way they advertise their HP. Some of us may not be getting our moneys worth.
Last edited by onofew; Apr 3, 2008 at 08:47 AM.
You will end up with the coldest, fastest turning and most electrically charged C63 on the streets
Last edited by Rafal; Apr 3, 2008 at 10:27 PM.
You will end up with the coldest, fastest turning and most electrically charged C63 on the streets

Erm, underdriving accessories makes them spin slower, which frees up a few bhp.
You will end up with the coldest, fastest turning and most electrically charged C63 on the streets

Look at the new SL, rated at the full power...
Edit, thought about this a bit more, and even the notion is ridiculous, AMG would be completely uncompetitive agains BMW M and Audi RS
The M5/M6 has 500bhp, and the new RS6 will have 580bhp.
If the larger AMGs only had 450bhp, not only would they have less power and much less torque than the blown M113s, they would be completely outpowered by all rivals.
Last edited by EVLC36; Apr 3, 2008 at 11:41 PM.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...ighlight=vr530
for those to lazy to search
http://www.vrptuning.com/projects/VR530/
According to Axel at the AMG Performance Ctr in Stuttgart, adding 10% in pulley size will have "Virtually no effect on Cooling, Charging or Steering systems."
On the VRP530 kit the AC pulley remains stock.
Last edited by NORTH 44 C63; Apr 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM.
Jimmy




, still the car won't go any faster