C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New CTS-V only runs 12.6 @ 116 MPH?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-01-2008, 08:57 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
New CTS-V only runs 12.6 @ 116 MPH?

As per the car and driver that arrived today, curb weight of 4292, 12.6 @ 116 MPH. I expected more from 556HP!
Old 10-01-2008, 09:12 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Glock Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steel Gray 09' C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Fikse
As per the car and driver that arrived today, curb weight of 4292, 12.6 @ 116 MPH. I expected more from 556HP!
4292, and I was thinking the C63 was a lead sled.
Old 10-01-2008, 09:25 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
moparrbust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 Crossfire SRT-6
To run a 12.6 @ 116 means you are having some pretty big traction issues. A 116mph trap is good for high 11's if you can get off the line.


Ohh; my Charger SRT-8 ran a 12.8 @108 and weighs in at 4450lbs with me in it.
Old 10-01-2008, 10:29 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
supercharged LS9; damn. thing is a boat at ~4300 lbs. i wanna hear the whine on that blower
Old 10-01-2008, 10:35 PM
  #5  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Must've been an auto?

I'm sure everyone knows what it ran at the Ring, a mere 3 seconds slower than a C6 Z06--and it was an auto CTS-V.
Old 10-01-2008, 10:40 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Timeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 ///AMG
Originally Posted by jturkel
supercharged LS9; damn. thing is a boat at ~4300 lbs. i wanna hear the whine on that blower
If it is like the ZR1, you won't hear it.

Originally Posted by MHP
Must've been an auto?

I'm sure everyone knows what it ran at the Ring, a mere 3 seconds slower than a C6 Z06--and it was an auto CTS-V.
The reports are that the autos are faster.
Old 10-01-2008, 10:43 PM
  #7  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Timeless
If it is like the ZR1, you won't hear it.
4 lobe TVS FTW.



The reports are that the autos are faster.
Only because most people can't launch a car with that much TQ.
Old 10-02-2008, 02:34 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ny
Posts: 4,454
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Anything W/4Wheels
The CTS-V ran the quarter-mile in a scant 12.5 seconds, besting the 12.7 it takes for either the BMW M5 or the Mercedes E63 AMG. Getting back to a standstill was another hit to the Bimmer and the Benz, with the Caddy stopping from 60-0 mph in 109 feet – five feet less than it takes the M5 and six shorter than the AMG. And if you're thinking that brakes and power are easy to upgrade and that the Cadillac couldn't possibly best the Germans on the handling course, think again: the CTS-V ran the slalom at 71.1 mph, while the M5 and E63 ran it in 68.5 and 65 mph respectively.




car and driver
Old 10-02-2008, 02:38 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ny
Posts: 4,454
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Anything W/4Wheels
ohhhh shti

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/specs.html
Old 10-02-2008, 08:21 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
this was the 6 speed, the auto should be quicker....


as for supercharger whine, you can hear a little on the zr1, here is a dyno video:

http://www.dragtimes.com/Chevrolet-C...lip-16473.html



.
Old 10-02-2008, 08:44 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
FishtailnZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking for a new toy.
Found this vid on another site. Post was written by the BMW 335iX owner. He noted that he got the Caddy at the lights and out of the hole pretty good, but at the end the CTS-V just blew by him to run 12.4 at 120! There were two versions there testing, a 6-speed manual and the new 6-speed slushbox. Best time for the manual was 12.3 at 121 and a 12.4 at 120 for the automatic. In the vid the Bimmer ran 12.7 at 110 with an "aggressive tune (Juice Box) and catless downpipes."


http://s188.photobucket.com/albums/z...bmwvscaddy.flv
Old 10-02-2008, 09:02 AM
  #12  
kip
Super Member
 
kip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by Fikse
As per the car and driver that arrived today, curb weight of 4292, 12.6 @ 116 MPH. I expected more from 556HP!
In my experience with these > 400bhp cars it starts to be all about traction...
All these cars go 12 something. But this and the RS6 results just show that our E55's are still fast out there.
Old 10-02-2008, 09:29 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
very nice, where was this post with the cts-v info?





Originally Posted by FishtailnZ
Found this vid on another site. Post was written by the BMW 335iX owner. He noted that he got the Caddy at the lights and out of the hole pretty good, but at the end the CTS-V just blew by him to run 12.4 at 120! There were two versions there testing, a 6-speed manual and the new 6-speed slushbox. Best time for the manual was 12.3 at 121 and a 12.4 at 120 for the automatic. In the vid the Bimmer ran 12.7 at 110 with an "aggressive tune (Juice Box) and catless downpipes."


http://s188.photobucket.com/albums/z...bmwvscaddy.flv
Old 10-02-2008, 09:54 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
FishtailnZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking for a new toy.
From the CTS-V forum, just follow the link:

http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...s-v-track.html
Old 10-02-2008, 10:01 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
YellowJacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2014 E63
This thing will be a beast. Its a full sized sedan to boot. I love the interior.
Old 10-02-2008, 01:31 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
bigbodybeeenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On the moon
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bike
Meh...it's still a Caddy. I don't really care if it's faster than the C63...I wouldn't buy it. Resale if probably awful on these.

Also, it's a supercharged V8. Of course it's going to make more power than the C63.
Old 10-02-2008, 01:57 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bigben320e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Blasting off!
Posts: 3,764
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
CLS63 Designo Edition, Hyundai Genesis 3.8 , Veloster Turbo, CLS500(Sold), E320 (SMOKED) R500 (Sold)
Guys, this may need to go in the kill section, lol.

Yesterday, from the light at dead stop a CTS-? (not sure of what after the CTS) was racing me to the ramp in my E320. I was sure I was dead meat, but I out-pulled by half car length. I was surprised, the Caddy sounded like it was straining. IDK?
Old 10-02-2008, 08:44 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Timeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55 ///AMG
Originally Posted by bigben320e
Guys, this may need to go in the kill section, lol.

Yesterday, from the light at dead stop a CTS-? (not sure of what after the CTS) was racing me to the ramp in my E320. I was sure I was dead meat, but I out-pulled by half car length. I was surprised, the Caddy sounded like it was straining. IDK?
CTS-SUCK
Old 10-03-2008, 11:13 AM
  #19  
gpk
Newbie
 
gpk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigbodybeeenz
Meh...it's still a Caddy. I don't really care if it's faster than the C63...I wouldn't buy it. Resale if probably awful on these.

Also, it's a supercharged V8. Of course it's going to make more power than the C63.

As compared to resale on AMG cars?
Old 10-03-2008, 03:03 PM
  #20  
Member
 
DoctorV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 246
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 CL65
Originally Posted by MHP
Must've been an auto?

I'm sure everyone knows what it ran at the Ring, a mere 3 seconds slower than a C6 Z06--and it was an auto CTS-V.
Sure the CTS-V is fast, but not THAT fast. 3 seconds? Try 17.

7:42.9 for the C6 Z06 vs 7:59 for the cad
Old 10-03-2008, 04:24 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
03miamisnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C230K Sport Sedan
Originally Posted by bigben320e
Guys, this may need to go in the kill section, lol.

Yesterday, from the light at dead stop a CTS-? (not sure of what after the CTS) was racing me to the ramp in my E320. I was sure I was dead meat, but I out-pulled by half car length. I was surprised, the Caddy sounded like it was straining. IDK?

Great kill. Just for clarification though, there was nothing after the CTS.
Old 10-03-2008, 04:47 PM
  #22  
Member
 
DoctorV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 246
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 CL65
Yeah, that was probably a V6 regular CTS.

And keep in mind that the new 2009 CTS-V has over 150 HP more than the 2004-7 CTS-V....
Old 10-03-2008, 05:04 PM
  #23  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by DoctorV8
Sure the CTS-V is fast, but not THAT fast. 3 seconds? Try 17.

7:42.9 for the C6 Z06 vs 7:59 for the cad
Who's your source?

7:28 --- Porsche Carrera GT, Walther Röhrl, Autobild July 2004
7:32.4 -- Porsche Carrera GT, definitive time by Horst Von Saurma
7:32.5 - Gemballa Porsche GTR 600 EVO, Wolfgang Kaufmann (2001)
7:36 --- Porsche Carrera GT, factory test driver Walther Röhrl (2002)
7:40* -- Porsche Carrera GT, *estimated time on cold and partially wet track (2003)
7:40* -- 161.217 km/h – Corvette Z06, 505 PS/ 1419.7 kg (estimated), Jan Magnusen
7:40 --- Mercedes Benz McLaren SLR, Klaus Ludwig, Autobild July 2004
7:42 --- Radical 1500 SR3 (2002)
7:43 --- TechArt GT Street (2001)
7:43 --- Porsche 996 911 GT3 RS, factory test driver Walter Rohrl, MOTOR Magazine
7:43.5 - Lamborghini Murcielago (Autocar magazine, 2002)
7:44 --- Pagani Zonda C12S (07/2003)
7:45 --- Gemballa Porsche GTR 600 (12/2000)
7:46 --- Porsche 996 GT2
7:46 --- SHK Porsche 993 GT2, 652 PS (1999)
7:47 --- Porsche 996 GT3 RS, 381PS (996) (2004)
7:49 --- Porsche 996 GT3 Cup
7:50 --- BMW E46 M3 CSL (08/2003)
7:50 --- Blitz Supra, 750 PS, Herbert Schürg (1997)
7:50 --- Honda RC30, Helmut Daehne (1993)
7:50 --- Lamborghini Murcielago (06/2002)
7:52 --- Gemballa Porsche 911 Le Mans (1995)
7:52 --- Lamborghini Gallardo E-Gear (12/2003)
7:52 --- Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren (06/2004)
7:54 --- Porsche GT3 (996) (2003)
7:55 --- Caterham R500 Superlight (2002)
7:56 --- Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale (02/2004)
7:56 --- Porsche 996 Turbo
7:56 --- Honda NSX-R - Motoharu Kurosawa, Best MOTORing
7:56 --- Chevrolet Corvette CE Z06
Old 10-03-2008, 05:51 PM
  #24  
Member
 
DoctorV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 246
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 CL65
Originally Posted by MHP
Who's your source?


7:40* -- 161.217 km/h – Corvette Z06, 505 PS/ 1419.7 kg (estimated), Jan Magnusen

7:56 --- Chevrolet Corvette CE Z06
No dice, MHP....The CE Z06 was the "collectors edition" 2004 model..the last of the C5's with 405 HP. Notice your own source lists 7:40 for the 505 HP C6 Z06.
Old 10-03-2008, 06:11 PM
  #25  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by DoctorV8
No dice, MHP....The CE Z06 was the "collectors edition" 2004 model..the last of the C5's with 405 HP. Notice your own source lists 7:40 for the 505 HP C6 Z06.
Doh good call Doc, my bad (not sure how the hell I overlooked that).


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New CTS-V only runs 12.6 @ 116 MPH?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM.