Pulled over for not using turn signal...receive 5 tickets...



The way to stop government from using fines to protect their bloated budgets is to give the fines and the additional fees (which are 3 to 4 times the amount of the "fine.") back to the tax payers. Why does government get to keep that money? That is the peoples' money. They need to divide it up and every citizen gets a check.
Why are police and Courts involved in any type of incentive system for doing their job? Why do people get tickets for driving 38 in a 35? Because it produces revenue, not because it is unsafe.
Why are cops earning 100K+ and 90% retirement at age 48 for a job that requires 400 hours training beyond high school? Partly because they can bring money into the agency by engaging in harassment.
If you get a ticket now you need to play hardball with the cops. Always pay a lawyer to represent you in Court, and after you are declared Not Guilty (easy for a good attorney when he is up against a guy who struggled to finish high school) ask the Judge to sanction the agency and the cop. I saw a cop forced to write a $ 300. check on the spot for holding up an Engineering & Traffic Survey report in a Radar ticket case, but the pages inside were blank.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The way to stop government from using fines to protect their bloated budgets is to give the fines and the additional fees (which are 3 to 4 times the amount of the "fine.") back to the tax payers. Why does government get to keep that money? That is the peoples' money. They need to divide it up and every citizen gets a check.
Why are police and Courts involved in any type of incentive system for doing their job? Why do people get tickets for driving 38 in a 35? Because it produces revenue, not because it is unsafe.
Why are cops earning 100K+ and 90% retirement at age 48 for a job that requires 400 hours training beyond high school? Partly because they can bring money into the agency by engaging in harassment.
If you get a ticket now you need to play hardball with the cops. Always pay a lawyer to represent you in Court, and after you are declared Not Guilty (easy for a good attorney when he is up against a guy who struggled to finish high school) ask the Judge to sanction the agency and the cop. I saw a cop forced to write a $ 300. check on the spot for holding up an Engineering & Traffic Survey report in a Radar ticket case, but the pages inside were blank.
90% of all traffic ticket attorneys will go talk to the prosecutor (which you yourself can do), get the points eliminated and have you pay a fine. The chances that you are found "not guilty" are very slim, and the court will always take the word of a law officer over yours.
Your attorney is not only up against a cop (which aren't quite as dumb as you think) they are also up against factual evidence and things such as a radar guns.
What you saw is anecdotal and irrelevant, much like your post. Unless you have a very strong case (which the OP doesn't), you will hardly ever get off scot free (unless the cop doesn't appear, which is rare since they get overtime pay to go).
And OP... grow up and use your turn signal. Doesn't matter what lane you're in.
And OP... grow up and use your turn signal. Doesn't matter what lane you're in.
Whoa!!! A little harsh there buddy. I see MANY Cops not using their turn signals, ESPECIALLY in the So Cal. area. Not saying thats right, I try to use mine ALL the time but were only humans, and we sometimes forget or zone out.
But honestly, I think that cops need to start giving people tickets for not using their signals. I know people who simply don't use their turn signals, no matter what. People think they don't need to because they won't get tickets for it, but the truth is that not using your turn signal is very dangerous. It's the only form of communication you have with other cars.
IMO, cops are not doing their duty by not giving signal tickets.
90% of all traffic ticket attorneys will go talk to the prosecutor (which you yourself can do), get the points eliminated and have you pay a fine. The chances that you are found "not guilty" are very slim, and the court will always take the word of a law officer over yours.
Your attorney is not only up against a cop (which aren't quite as dumb as you think) they are also up against factual evidence and things such as a radar guns.
What you saw is anecdotal and irrelevant, much like your post. Unless you have a very strong case (which the OP doesn't), you will hardly ever get off scot free (unless the cop doesn't appear, which is rare since they get overtime pay to go).
I have personally gone up against cops in court and won - my word against theirs - the court sided with me. So "always" is just not factual.
Agree with you the OP does not have much of a case.
I am sure that anyone in my family that all of a sudden decides to become bipolar won't also suddenly develop a case of the short bus syndrome. So no worries about having them embarrassing me on a public forum.



Your post was full of tired old saws including some that are offensive to the traditional notions of substantial justice and fair play.






