C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Go Fast Parts via MHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-24-2010, 06:39 PM
  #26  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Zod
Am sorry, I see your point in ''function over form'', but those look like an off the shelf product of any normal exhaust Shop.

You have to also take into consideration the manufacturing costs with the final product you receive

I ask this because price determines how one should expect the product should be...

it is already well known that if you want power out of the 63 LT's are the way to go

so I ask again how much are these going for?
Just for comparison's sake, when I look at the stock manifolds that came off of my car today, the inside welds look nearly identical to the MHP LTs, only much dirtier. Like I've stated before, it is the lighting that makes it look worse than it is.

According to my understanding, the manufacturing costs of these products only factors partially into the selling price. Most of the money of the selling price is to regain the amount of time and money the vendors spent on R&D of these products. Just like all new products developed for a small market, the costs will be high because there is simply not enough returns to balance out the costs. Thus, the high selling prices of performance parts for our cars. If the C63 was a mass-produced car that sells as frequently as Toyota Camrys, then more vendors will jump into the mix to try and capture some of that huge market--thus, creating competition and lower prices for us buyers. But in the end, what truly matters is whether to products we buy performs according to or above our expectations.

As for pricing, please contact Andy at MHP for any inquiries.
Old 02-24-2010, 06:45 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Unbreakable1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63, 2000 Nissan Maxima
Originally Posted by mthis
that's true lol. I'm also at work 14hr a day so I'm on my iPhone and this thing got a mind of it's own sometimes lol. I type something and it changes it to something else. Wierd huh. Hey I do write and read 3 languages .
that may be the most coherent sentence ive read from you! haha ...im juss kidding, sort of
Old 02-24-2010, 07:36 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
nrgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 869
Received 35 Likes on 15 Posts
AMG GT-R
Been out of town and didn't have a chance to reply until today, but congrats on the LTs! I'm glad they arrived in time for our dyno session. I hope the install goes smooth for you...or maybe you already have them on, but looking forward to reading your post install reactions
Old 02-24-2010, 08:26 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
Can you guys compare the sound differences between LT catted and not catted - nrgy and avenger?
Thanks
Old 02-24-2010, 08:29 PM
  #30  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by chubbs032
Can you guys compare the sound differences between LT catted and not catted - nrgy and avenger?
Thanks
I'll be doing an independent sound test this Saturday.
Old 02-25-2010, 02:41 AM
  #31  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by nrgy
Been out of town and didn't have a chance to reply until today, but congrats on the LTs! I'm glad they arrived in time for our dyno session. I hope the install goes smooth for you...or maybe you already have them on, but looking forward to reading your post install reactions
Welcome back! The installation went well and as for my post-install reactions... I give it:

First of all, I wasn't there for the very first cold-start post-install, but I darn well wished I was! The guys at the shop said the sound was bouncing off all the walls and echoed in their ears so loudly that they had to turn it off almost immediately. But after it warms up, it's a very subdued. Then, when I feather the gas, it lets out the seductive growl that is oh-so-sexxy! And of course, WOT is fricken LOUD... BUT the sound is very thrilling and addictive from inside the cockpit. Outside the cockpit, however, that's an entirely different story. However, at cruising in Comfort mode or idling, you can't tell that it's modded. What I really LOVE is the fact that the car still retained some of that attractive throaty C63 exhaust note that we've all come to love...but this is only at partial throttle.

As for performance, man, I give it . All cars should come this way from the factory! On second thought, I take that back after reading that "C63 accident thread" from patrick. First gear pulls are so incredibly quick, you'll redline before your brain can register that flashing red display on your dash and tell your fingers (or hand) to react. Then 2nd gear goes by almost as quickly, but you won't be able to notice much because your brain will be in glued to the headrest. Third gear follows suit and by then, you will just realize that your mouth had been open the entire time. Fourth gear is the icing on the cake, because you'd invariably be at 120mph or more by then. When I was going from a dig in 1st with ESP off, the car fishtailed every single time.

And from a roll, the car just goes! Instant rocket booster! Honestly, the difference between this and just an ECU tune or stock is not even funny.


Originally Posted by chubbs032
Can you guys compare the sound differences between LT catted and not catted - nrgy and avenger?
Thanks
If nrgy's car is exactly how it sounds in the Forza clip, then mine is a bit louder. But in real life, it may be a different story. Of course, catless will be louder than catted, but by how much...we'll see.

Originally Posted by superlubricity
I'll be doing an independent sound test this Saturday.
I want decibel readings or it's . Haha.

Seriously, though...cover your ears when these cars are on the dyno. No joke.

Last edited by avengerboater; 02-25-2010 at 02:44 AM.
Old 02-25-2010, 08:25 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
The only drawback is that every law enforcement officer within 3 miles goes into active search mode whenever you nail it. This is not even a joke as my 9500ci gets many more signals after a quick burst of hyper drive.
Old 02-25-2010, 01:37 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
miami1lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 393
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'09 C63 AMG, '10 ML350 4Matic
MHP posts 95-105 rwhp gains/60-65 rwtq gains...

Are you guys seeing these numbers?

So, that means with a K1 tune, where I picked up about 45 rwhp and not much tq, I should expect another 50-60 whp and about the same tq (assuming the K1 tune "adjusts" nicely to the new hardware)?

If so, that means with a K1 tune and MHP LT headers, I should be throwing down near 470rwhp and 420rwtq--thats 570+ hp at the crank ?

That would be a great pickup for the money!
Old 02-25-2010, 01:43 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
It's said that you should get the K2 tune with LTs. Don't know the differences between K1 and K2, timing, etc.., I guess. But I would be interested in what the K1 does with LTs as I have the K1.
Old 02-25-2010, 01:59 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Did you delete the pri cats, and everything past that is stock?
Old 02-25-2010, 02:06 PM
  #36  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by miami1lt
MHP posts 95-105 rwhp gains/60-65 rwtq gains...

Are you guys seeing these numbers?

So, that means with a K1 tune, where I picked up about 45 rwhp and not much tq, I should expect another 50-60 whp and about the same tq (assuming the K1 tune "adjusts" nicely to the new hardware)?

If so, that means with a K1 tune and MHP LT headers, I should be throwing down near 470rwhp and 420rwtq--thats 570+ hp at the crank ?

That would be a great pickup for the money!
Originally Posted by Even Money
It's said that you should get the K2 tune with LTs. Don't know the differences between K1 and K2, timing, etc.., I guess. But I would be interested in what the K1 does with LTs as I have the K1.
You should definitely get the ECU retuned to accommodate and fully exploit the potentials of a the long-tube headers. A K1 tune was not tuned for the increased air flow that is seen after the restrictive stock primary cats. As for increase of rwhp, I'll find out this Saturday what it really is after breaking in my car a bit.

Originally Posted by Even Money
Did you delete the pri cats, and everything past that is stock?
Primaries and secondaries. Stock from the resonator back.
Old 02-25-2010, 02:11 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dads C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
2014 Audi RS7
Originally Posted by avengerboater
Welcome back! The installation went well and as for my post-install reactions... I give it:

First of all, I wasn't there for the very first cold-start post-install, but I darn well wished I was! The guys at the shop said the sound was bouncing off all the walls and echoed in their ears so loudly that they had to turn it off almost immediately. But after it warms up, it's a very subdued. Then, when I feather the gas, it lets out the seductive growl that is oh-so-sexxy! And of course, WOT is fricken LOUD... BUT the sound is very thrilling and addictive from inside the cockpit. Outside the cockpit, however, that's an entirely different story. However, at cruising in Comfort mode or idling, you can't tell that it's modded. What I really LOVE is the fact that the car still retained some of that attractive throaty C63 exhaust note that we've all come to love...but this is only at partial throttle.

As for performance, man, I give it . All cars should come this way from the factory! On second thought, I take that back after reading that "C63 accident thread" from patrick. First gear pulls are so incredibly quick, you'll redline before your brain can register that flashing red display on your dash and tell your fingers (or hand) to react. Then 2nd gear goes by almost as quickly, but you won't be able to notice much because your brain will be in glued to the headrest. Third gear follows suit and by then, you will just realize that your mouth had been open the entire time. Fourth gear is the icing on the cake, because you'd invariably be at 120mph or more by then. When I was going from a dig in 1st with ESP off, the car fishtailed every single time.

And from a roll, the car just goes! Instant rocket booster! Honestly, the difference between this and just an ECU tune or stock is not even funny.




If nrgy's car is exactly how it sounds in the Forza clip, then mine is a bit louder. But in real life, it may be a different story. Of course, catless will be louder than catted, but by how much...we'll see.



I want decibel readings or it's . Haha.

Seriously, though...cover your ears when these cars are on the dyno. No joke.
Welcome to the MHP "header group". The performance and response is incredible!

Beware of your hearing.
Old 02-25-2010, 02:14 PM
  #38  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Dads C63

Beware of your hearing.
What did you say? I can't hear you over your car.
Old 02-25-2010, 02:16 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dads C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
2014 Audi RS7
Originally Posted by avengerboater
What did you say? I can't hear you over your car.
WHAT, HUH??

God I love this car!
Old 02-25-2010, 02:17 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RLx02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,375
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
C55
Originally Posted by Zod
Am sorry, I see your point in ''function over form'', but those look like an off the shelf product of any normal exhaust Shop.
If I'm paying almost 5k for a set of headers I would hope they would look as good as they perform.

I wish I took some pictures of my headers before I had them installed but they were very well made and even just nice to look at out of the box.

These aren't mine, but for example:
Old 02-25-2010, 02:24 PM
  #41  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by RLx02
If I'm paying almost 5k for a set of headers I would hope they would look as good as they perform.

I wish I took some pictures of my headers before I had them installed but they were very well made and even just nice to look at out of the box.

These aren't mine, but for example:
I see your point, but keep in mind that if the vendor polishes the headers to a crazy shine, like the one in the pic, that would increase cost and that cost would be undoubtedly pass on to the buyer and reflected in the selling price. The headers are great to look at, for sure...but if it's tucked in the engine bay that's tighter than spandex, I'd rather it not be polished and save some $$$.
Old 02-25-2010, 03:57 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dads C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
2014 Audi RS7
Originally Posted by miami1lt
MHP posts 95-105 rwhp gains/60-65 rwtq gains...

Are you guys seeing these numbers?

So, that means with a K1 tune, where I picked up about 45 rwhp and not much tq, I should expect another 50-60 whp and about the same tq (assuming the K1 tune "adjusts" nicely to the new hardware)?

If so, that means with a K1 tune and MHP LT headers, I should be throwing down near 470rwhp and 420rwtq--thats 570+ hp at the crank ?

That would be a great pickup for the money!
The numbers listed above are real numbers but thats with the matching MHP V3 long tube tune. Its been proven that the K2 will work but in order to maximize the gains you need the tune that matches the headers. I just don't want anyone to be mislead by the numbers if/when they don't reach them with a different tune. Really just common logic but I wanted to clarify it.
Old 02-25-2010, 05:01 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
The only difference between K1 tune and K2 tune is that K2 has the 02 sensor delete so you don't get any codes thrown on your dash from removing primary cats with their header package. Correct me if i'm wrong, but I'm usually not. lol

BTW decibels would be nice. I'm contemplating if the extra 500 for cats is worth it to decrease the noise just a tad or something more significant.

Last edited by BerBer63; 02-25-2010 at 05:11 PM.
Old 02-25-2010, 05:34 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Originally Posted by chubbs032
The only difference between K1 tune and K2 tune is that K2 has the 02 sensor delete so you don't get any codes thrown on your dash from removing primary cats with their header package. Correct me if i'm wrong, but I'm usually not.
So, you could get LTs, and hi flow primary cats(cost you a few hp/tq) and K1 tune should work...that would be nice. I tire of shipping my ECU.
Old 02-25-2010, 05:49 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
You still need K2 for o2 sensor delete.
Old 02-25-2010, 06:22 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
miami1lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 393
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'09 C63 AMG, '10 ML350 4Matic
Originally Posted by chubbs032
You still need K2 for o2 sensor delete.
So if that is the only ECU difference, perhaps Kleemann would be willing to offer a very cheap upgrade...most of the K2 upgrade costs come from the headers, etc...

Cory, what would it cost to send an ECU back for an O2 sensor delete (w/o shipping of course)?
Old 02-25-2010, 06:52 PM
  #47  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by chubbs032
The only difference between K1 tune and K2 tune is that K2 has the 02 sensor delete so you don't get any codes thrown on your dash from removing primary cats with their header package. Correct me if i'm wrong, but I'm usually not. lol

BTW decibels would be nice. I'm contemplating if the extra 500 for cats is worth it to decrease the noise just a tad or something more significant.
I'm sorry, but I don't think this is accurate. I spoke with Cory prior to getting my K1 to K2 flash, and he stated that the timing and fuel parameters are different on a K2. Also, the day of my LT installation, the shop guys wanted to do a pre-install baseline run, but I didn't think it was a good idea. After placing a call to Cory, he confirmed that it was a BAD idea, unless I wanted detonation at WOT.

So, it would only be logical to deduce that the differences K1 and K2 maps are more than just a simple O2 CEL delete.
Old 02-25-2010, 07:00 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BerBer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,257
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63
I'm glad someone knows what they're talking about around here.
Old 02-25-2010, 07:10 PM
  #49  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by avengerboater
After placing a call to Cory, he confirmed that it was a BAD idea, unless I wanted detonation at WOT.
Did he tell you why? I'd love to know the answer.
Old 02-25-2010, 11:14 PM
  #50  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
avengerboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Did he tell you why? I'd love to know the answer.
The K2 map runs a more aggressive ignition timing map on cars with headers which isn't safe for the stock manifolds, but as long as you drive conservatively to your installing shop, you'll be OK. No wide open throttle runs, and no heavy acceleration from a stop.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Go Fast Parts via MHP



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.