Senior Member
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...-5-5-liter-v-8
did anybody else get the official press release from AMG Private Lounge?
did anybody else get the official press release from AMG Private Lounge?
Member
Quote:
I wouldnt be so sure. Technology finds its way down into lower priced cars all the time. As they recoup the r&d on the tranny and then find new, faster and more efficient ways to mfg the tranny it will find its way into other carsand eventually it will be in the entrys. It may not fit our timetable but eventually it alwayys does. Originally Posted by hhughes1
Article claims that it will produce up to 664lbs of torque yet still be mated to the 7 speed. This is very strange considering the E55 was never given that tranny due to concerns with the torque being just over 500 lbs. I guess the wet clutch setup of the MCT solves the weak link (torque converter). This new motor and MCT tranny will not ever be found in a $60,000 car.
The company I work for developed a new technology for image detectors and after 3yrs it was cheaper for us to produce the new technology than the old way we had been doing it for the last 35yrs. At first we made extra profit on the product because everyone wanted the new technology and it demanded a premium, but as time has eveloved it is now making its way into the entry level products. Everyone wins , the customer gets a better product and the company makes more money.
I would love to have the mct in my car though.
Super Member
Quote:
Except it uses stop-start technology to achieve it.Originally Posted by exdes
wow all that power and 26mpg!!!
http://rumors.automobilemag.com/6508...-cd/index.html
Quote:
did anybody else get the official press release from AMG Private Lounge?
Sure did and it was a great morning....Originally Posted by C63 DTM AMG
http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1...-5-5-liter-v-8did anybody else get the official press release from AMG Private Lounge?
2005 saw the debut of the AMG 6.3-litre V8 engine known as the M 156. Depending on the model, this naturally aspirated, high-revving unit develops up to 386 kW (525 hp) and 630 newton metres.
5.5TT with performance package has 571 hp. In this case the eight-cylinder delivers 875 newton metres of torque at just 2000 rpm, with a constant 900 newton metres available between 2500 and 3750 rpm
A 30% increase and when coupled with a 300 lb weight reduction and easy mods, well you can imagine.
.
I just hope that they'll change the name - C55TT sounds really bad 

Super Member
Read all about the new engines on the AMG site:
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/#/news/1
stop/start tech is included!
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/#/news/1
stop/start tech is included!
I don't think I can tolerate a start/stop feature on my car. I hope there is a way to deactivate it.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreMBWorld Fanatic!
The TT set up will be great but I believe tuning will be VERY difficult if/when ever accomplished. The manufacturers are doing a great job of keeping expert tuners out of the ECU. Many tuners are still seeking ways into the newer programs with no success. Thats why piggy back set ups are having to be used in many cases and that usually creates nightmares.
Remember that with L/T headers and a matching tune you will be making the same HP with less torque than the new TT. However, put in a heads and cam combination and the new TT will be left behind.
Remember that with L/T headers and a matching tune you will be making the same HP with less torque than the new TT. However, put in a heads and cam combination and the new TT will be left behind.
MBWorld Fanatic!
sign me up for the C with the V8TT motor when it comes out! tuners will figure it out.....
Quote:
Remember that with L/T headers and a matching tune you will be making the same HP with less torque than the new TT. However, put in a heads and cam combination and the new TT will be left behind.
Originally Posted by Dads C63
The TT set up will be great but I believe tuning will be VERY difficult if/when ever accomplished. The manufacturers are doing a great job of keeping expert tuners out of the ECU. Many tuners are still seeking ways into the newer programs with no success. Thats why piggy back set ups are having to be used in many cases and that usually creates nightmares. Remember that with L/T headers and a matching tune you will be making the same HP with less torque than the new TT. However, put in a heads and cam combination and the new TT will be left behind.
Member
Quote:
A 30% increase and when coupled with a 300 lb weight reduction and easy mods, well you can imagine.
.
Originally Posted by turbotom1
A 30% increase and when coupled with a 300 lb weight reduction and easy mods, well you can imagine.
.
Where did you see a 300 lb weight reduction? The article on Edmunds says the new 5.5 actuall weighs more than the current 6.2 engine (all the plumbing I suppose....), and I'm trying to remember the last time a new model from Benz, BMW, or Audi wieghed less than the previous version. That's why we keep getting the horsepower increases, cause the cars keep getting heavier.
Cylinder Head
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- LocationSeattle
- Posts:6,760
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(1)
- Vehicle(s) I drive'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
-
Likes:632
-
Liked:594 Times in 388 Posts
Quote:
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." - Albert EinsteinOriginally Posted by Palladin
Where did you see a 300 lb weight reduction? The article on Edmunds says the new 5.5 actuall weighs more than the current 6.2 engine (all the plumbing I suppose....), and I'm trying to remember the last time a new model from Benz, BMW, or Audi wieghed less than the previous version. That's why we keep getting the horsepower increases, cause the cars keep getting heavier.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
It probably won't have the same grunt because the turbos will mute the sound a bit. You can always replace the diverter valve(s) with blow off valve(s). Originally Posted by B512M
just hope they make it sound as loud as our cars.
Pfft....Pfft.....MBWorld Fanatic!
so how fast will a Brabus V8TT run? or maybe V12TT 

MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
750 BHP in a C-class... hmmm...Originally Posted by MNL ICE
so how fast will a Brabus V8TT run? or maybe V12TT
Quote:
It would suck to get new rear tires every two weeks though.Originally Posted by propain
750 BHP in a C-class... hmmm...

Mort
MBWorld Fanatic!
close
- Join DateFeb 2010
- Posts:5,649
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- Vehicle(s) I drive2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
-
Likes:172
-
Liked:484 Times in 399 Posts
Quote:
Ha Ha....Originally Posted by GBlansten
It would suck to get new rear tires every two weeks though.

It is kind of weird to be reading about potential improvements to the car and I haven't even taken delivery yet.

I think I am going to be happy anyway.

Super Member
Quote:
I was speaking about AMG's weight reduction goals. They have written quite a bit consistently over the last 4 years about it and lectured at auto events about what they call Sustainability. Originally Posted by Palladin
Where did you see a 300 lb weight reduction? The article on Edmunds says the new 5.5 actuall weighs more than the current 6.2 engine (all the plumbing I suppose....), and I'm trying to remember the last time a new model from Benz, BMW, or Audi wieghed less than the previous version. That's why we keep getting the horsepower increases, cause the cars keep getting heavier.
2006:
http://www.insideline.com/features/i...ornhinweg.html
2007:
http://www.autospies.com/news/Merced...duction-22829/
2008: http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/da...ker_mornhinweg
2009:
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...-increase.html
http://www.worldcarfans.com/10901151...-wars-are-over
2010
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/webspeci.../green_en.html
.
Senior Member
Quote:
Remember that with L/T headers and a matching tune you will be making the same HP with less torque than the new TT. However, put in a heads and cam combination and the new TT will be left behind.
True, but just a tune and no hardware on the TT (when the tuners figure it out) and we with all our hardware and mods will be left very far behind.Originally Posted by Dads C63
The TT set up will be great but I believe tuning will be VERY difficult if/when ever accomplished. The manufacturers are doing a great job of keeping expert tuners out of the ECU. Many tuners are still seeking ways into the newer programs with no success. Thats why piggy back set ups are having to be used in many cases and that usually creates nightmares. Remember that with L/T headers and a matching tune you will be making the same HP with less torque than the new TT. However, put in a heads and cam combination and the new TT will be left behind.
Senior Member
They need top put a all wheel drive version of the cars equiped with the 5.5 tt engine if they want to put all that power and torque down and not just spin the rear wheels IMO.
Quote:
You bring up an interesting point but I'd worry about the extra weight from the AWD system.Originally Posted by c63canada
They need top put a all wheel drive version of the cars equiped with the 5.5 tt engine if they want to put all that power and torque down and not just spin the rear wheels IMO.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
+1 Originally Posted by c63canada
They need top put a all wheel drive version of the cars equiped with the 5.5 tt engine if they want to put all that power and torque down and not just spin the rear wheels IMO.
i read somewhere that some amg models in the future will have awd. didnt say the 5.5tt tho. this would be nice

Newbie
I spoke with one of the amg technical guys last month and the 5.5 tt wont be coming out in the c class. not enough room under the bonnet apparently.





