MY C63 ON MUSTANG DYNO BEFORE AND : )
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 C63 AMG
MY C63 ON MUSTANG DYNO BEFORE AND : )
MEET A REAL GREAT GROUP THIS AMG LOVERS THIS WEEKEND WHO RENTED OUT A LOCAL SHOP'S DYNO. END RESULT...
WELL...MUSTANG DYNO..(WHICH GIVES REAL LOW NUMBERS)
STOCK
366 WHP
366 TORQUE
AFTER TUNE
420 WHP
386 TORQUE
GREAT FEELING UP TOP! 54 WHP GAIN ON A MUSTANG DYNO!!!!!
WELL...MUSTANG DYNO..(WHICH GIVES REAL LOW NUMBERS)
STOCK
366 WHP
366 TORQUE
AFTER TUNE
420 WHP
386 TORQUE
GREAT FEELING UP TOP! 54 WHP GAIN ON A MUSTANG DYNO!!!!!
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Congrats again, the sound that car makes is intoxicating. How was the ride home? Now we need to get some people together for a trip to PBI raceway. ;-)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63 AMG
A Mustang dyno typically yields lower numbers than say, a Dynojet. However, his stock dyno pull looks to be on par with Dynojet numbers nonetheless so maybe there is some correction done by the dyno operator.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
that's right...a good mustang dyno operator will have the dyno properly calibrated and set up correctly, so you should get "dynojet" numbers, or what you would expect provided your tune is correct.
Trending Topics
#10
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
glad i got to witness this. car performed nicely after the tune. enjoy it! we will have to do this again soon. i think ill host another dyno event in May for those who missed out.
#12
OK, who did the tune?? Nice gains!!
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. FLA.
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
05 ML-500 , 03 CLK5.5 AMG has left the Garage
Nice Numbers
I was there . There was no monkey business, Just really good workmanship on Jeremy's part. I watched for 2 days straight. We had a good time , Met a lot of nice owners , with pride in their rides . Can you guy's post any video's. Best Regards to all whom particpated. _PTEngineering
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
I believe nothing of the claims since there is absolutely no indication of any tune being done, no brands, no vendor, no mods no nothing. A simple false claim in my book unless verified. It is a good way to get in the wrong foot on this forum and get a lot of people to not believe it and start arguing and doubting(me being the first one). The mod list have been asked but the owner refused to release, this is a classic "I believe it when I see it"
Last edited by C63newdude; 05-02-2010 at 10:55 PM.
#19
There's three people in this thread that said they saw the runs and the time put into the tune. Besides, Jeremy used to tune for Powerchip, so why wouldn't you believe it? He's been working on my car since I first got it tuned at Evosport and he definitely knows his stuff.
Josh
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Josh,
what is so difficult about telling people what really has been done? who tune it? what tune method, etc? I read that there were more people "present" during the tune but still no relevant information. You see what I mean? Also,I use a lot of sarcasm in many of my post, I do that to challenge a situation.
No need to question anything if the information was given in the first place.
what is so difficult about telling people what really has been done? who tune it? what tune method, etc? I read that there were more people "present" during the tune but still no relevant information. You see what I mean? Also,I use a lot of sarcasm in many of my post, I do that to challenge a situation.
No need to question anything if the information was given in the first place.
Last edited by C63newdude; 05-02-2010 at 11:10 PM.
#21
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
I believe nothing of the claims since there is absolutely no indication of any tune being done, no brands, no vendor, no mods no nothing. A simple false claim in my book unless verified. It is a good way to get in the wrong foot on this forum and get a lot of people to not believe it and start arguing and doubting(me being the first one). The mod list have been asked but the owner refused to release, this is a classic "I believe it when I see it"
BTW - for those who missed out we will be doing another event like this at the end of May. I will post details when i have them...
#23
Josh,
what is so difficult about telling people what really has been done? who tune it? what tune method, etc? I read that there were more people "present" during the tune but still no relevant information. You see what I mean? Also,I use a lot of sarcasm in many of my post, I do that to challenge a situation.
No need to question anything if the information was given in the first place.
what is so difficult about telling people what really has been done? who tune it? what tune method, etc? I read that there were more people "present" during the tune but still no relevant information. You see what I mean? Also,I use a lot of sarcasm in many of my post, I do that to challenge a situation.
No need to question anything if the information was given in the first place.
Yeah, it would be interesting to know the ambient temperatures because it shows two different dates for the pulls even though they're done at basically the same time of day, so that would make a slight difference, but his graph includes AFRs, something that a lot of other vendors (including one somewhat local to you) are utterly unwilling to show.
Just saying...
Josh
#25
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: denver,CO
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 c63, 2011 GT500