LP560-4 vs. C63
06-29-2010, 12:13 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharged E92 M3
LP560-4 vs. C63
Well this vid was taken about 2 month ago.
did have to time to edit the vid. But as you can see I am not very good at doing something like that. Its my very time with final cut pro.
anyways we are all friends just having some fun.
all I can say is the Lambo is 560HP stock is unreal I think its more power then what it claims. But I think the weight also have a big play in it as well.
I was in the Lambo and we where in ''CORSA MODE''
C63 was in S2 mode traction fully off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klkYjlB43D0
did have to time to edit the vid. But as you can see I am not very good at doing something like that. Its my very time with final cut pro.
anyways we are all friends just having some fun.
all I can say is the Lambo is 560HP stock is unreal I think its more power then what it claims. But I think the weight also have a big play in it as well.
I was in the Lambo and we where in ''CORSA MODE''
C63 was in S2 mode traction fully off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klkYjlB43D0
Last edited by EUGENE-Taiwan; 06-29-2010 at 12:32 AM. Reason: reloading vid
06-29-2010, 01:08 AM
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharged E92 M3
Trending Topics
06-29-2010, 05:46 AM
#8
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMG
I can see that Gintani have C63 ECU tune on their website. Very affordable price for 530hp. Is a tune ( for that price ) able to reach 530hp on a constant basis - they say Peak HP - ?
If yes , Gintani would then be the best hp/$ ratio availlable , no ?
If yes , Gintani would then be the best hp/$ ratio availlable , no ?
06-29-2010, 07:26 AM
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharged E92 M3
but as for power out put I think its pretty much the same NO?
06-29-2010, 10:23 AM
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharged E92 M3
so that is just under 3000lbs
06-29-2010, 06:29 PM
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharged E92 M3
06-30-2010, 01:18 AM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Good video indeed.. here is sme info from wikipedia(0-60 in 3.2 sec, 1/4 mile in 11 .2@129.5 mph), basically you would need like a C6 Z06(minimum) to start talking..
The Lambo is also light considering that huge monster motor, transmission, tires, brakes, rims and AWD system<<<<< all of these items weight a whole lot..
The Lambo is also light considering that huge monster motor, transmission, tires, brakes, rims and AWD system<<<<< all of these items weight a whole lot..
06-30-2010, 06:55 PM
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharged E92 M3
Good video indeed.. here is sme info from wikipedia(0-60 in 3.2 sec, 1/4 mile in 11 .2@129.5 mph), basically you would need like a C6 Z06(minimum) to start talking..
The Lambo is also light considering that huge monster motor, transmission, tires, brakes, rims and AWD system<<<<< all of these items weight a whole lot..
The Lambo is also light considering that huge monster motor, transmission, tires, brakes, rims and AWD system<<<<< all of these items weight a whole lot..
