c63< s4
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
996tt Protomotive, C63
The Evo, S4, and C63 all have their place in this World. For me the evo is a track toy and either of the other two are nice daily's. If I lived in Vermont I would buy the S4. If I lived in South Florida I would buy the C63. And people like aroonki are just plain ignorant... Best of luck to the OP on whichever he chooses...
Last edited by aroonkl; Aug 7, 2010 at 03:24 PM. Reason: correct
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
GT3
Tell ya what. When your *****box runs 121mph in the 1/8 then you can call my evo a riced out *****box. Until then I'm done arguing with you on the internet because not only do I have nothing to prove you dont have anything for me. I dont agree with the OP's thread title or tactics but I also dont agree with the way you guys are attacking evo's just because he owns one. There are way too many narrow minded people on this forum. You gonna call the GT-R or Supra a ricer? To me a riced out vehicle is a single over head cam Honda that produces less than 100whp with a different colored body kit, huge wing, and guages.
Carry on....
Carry on....
What is your obsession with the Evo? We get it, you have a track prepped riced out Evo. Who the heck cares? No one here cares! All we care about is making fun of some idiot troll that keeps saying that the S4 is superior to the C63. Stop mentioning the Evo, we don't give a crap about it.
Last edited by Most-Wanted; Aug 7, 2010 at 06:07 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 14
From: Houston, Texas - USA
2009 C63 AMG
Tell ya what. When your *****box runs 121mph in the 1/8 then you can call my evo a riced out *****box. Until then I'm done arguing with you on the internet because not only do I have nothing to prove you dont have anything for me. I dont agree with the OP's thread title or tactics but I also dont agree with the way you guys are attacking evo's just because he owns one. There are way too many narrow minded people on this forum. You gonna call the GT-R or Supra a ricer? To me a riced out vehicle is a single over head cam Honda that produces less than 100whp with a different colored body kit, huge wing, and guages.
Carry on....
Carry on....
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
I'm sure this has been said in all 5 pages of awesomeness, but they aren't even comparable.
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 73
From: Midwest, US
'17 GTR, '17 GLC43, '14 Panigale 899, '20 V4
I'm sure this has been said in all 5 pages of awesomeness, but they aren't even comparable.
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
GT3
Road course, 1/4 mile, top end runs, you pick... I'm gonna warn you now, its gonna be painful and hard to stomache LOL... I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
MBworld Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
not in terms of power, and not in terms of price either. sadly the C350 can't even compare to 335i.The new S4 is nice and IMO better than the C350 or the 335i.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 3
From: Thick Ascending Limb
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
So now the GT-R is also a FAIL because its AWD. You see, you cant have your cake and eat it too. Which is it? Please tell me you think the GT-R is a riced out POS and fails as a track car because its AWD and Japanese. You my friend are a complete idiot, act 12yo, and have nothing to contribute to this forum. Your posts are based on your personal opinion and not personal experience. I'm done here. Anytime you want that ****box of yours to get its a$$ handed to it bring it to Florida Road course, 1/4 mile, top end runs, you pick... I'm gonna warn you now, its gonna be painful and hard to stomache LOL...
I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
Road course, 1/4 mile, top end runs, you pick... I'm gonna warn you now, its gonna be painful and hard to stomache LOL... I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 1
From: Norcal
43
you're saying that when the GTR's 0-60 is 3.2 seconds, and a standing quarter mile at 11.6 STOCK? If you consider the R35 GTR slow, then what do you make of the C63? Just pondering...
Last edited by LawRens; Aug 7, 2010 at 09:22 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 3
From: Thick Ascending Limb
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
It's great off road with its AWD. If you are on the Rubicon Trail the GTR would be my go to car. But if you are on a track then clearly the C63 will dominate all other cars.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 1
From: Norcal
43
5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html
And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 3
From: Thick Ascending Limb
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
mmmm, makes sense i guess. Might be beating a dead horse here, but nurburgring times say GTR at 7m 29s, and C63 at 8m 33s?
5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html
And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html
And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
996tt Protomotive, C63
GTR 4wd does not mean for off road. On the track, stock-stock, it would eat C63 alive. No chance.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 3
From: Thick Ascending Limb
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,438
Likes: 388
From: Relocated
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
The C63 will get crushed on the track, road course or 1/4 by the GTR, it is not even a contest.
Of course the GTR was beat w/ an ugly stick and has a cheap interior....I would not take one over my C63 as a daily, but you can't argue w/ the performance.
A few are running in the 9's w/ just bolt ons.
Of course the GTR was beat w/ an ugly stick and has a cheap interior....I would not take one over my C63 as a daily, but you can't argue w/ the performance.
A few are running in the 9's w/ just bolt ons.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 3
From: Central Florida
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 14
From: Houston, Texas - USA
2009 C63 AMG
No, the GTR isn't a POS FAIL car, just your riced out Evo. You FAIL! Again, we don't give a crap about how fast your Evo is or that you take it to the track. Why do you keep bringing it up? Is that the only car you have? FAIL!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 14
From: Houston, Texas - USA
2009 C63 AMG
Oh no, now we're going to have post after post on the GTR now. Still doesn't make the S4 better than the C63. The OP is still.....FAIL! And riced out Evos too.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 1
From: Norcal
43
