c63< s4
#126
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
996tt Protomotive, C63
The Evo, S4, and C63 all have their place in this World. For me the evo is a track toy and either of the other two are nice daily's. If I lived in Vermont I would buy the S4. If I lived in South Florida I would buy the C63. And people like aroonki are just plain ignorant... Best of luck to the OP on whichever he chooses...
Last edited by aroonkl; 08-07-2010 at 03:24 PM. Reason: correct
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GT3
Tell ya what. When your *****box runs 121mph in the 1/8 then you can call my evo a riced out *****box. Until then I'm done arguing with you on the internet because not only do I have nothing to prove you dont have anything for me. I dont agree with the OP's thread title or tactics but I also dont agree with the way you guys are attacking evo's just because he owns one. There are way too many narrow minded people on this forum. You gonna call the GT-R or Supra a ricer? To me a riced out vehicle is a single over head cam Honda that produces less than 100whp with a different colored body kit, huge wing, and guages.
Carry on....
Carry on....
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
What is your obsession with the Evo? We get it, you have a track prepped riced out Evo. Who the heck cares? No one here cares! All we care about is making fun of some idiot troll that keeps saying that the S4 is superior to the C63. Stop mentioning the Evo, we don't give a crap about it.
Last edited by Most-Wanted; 08-07-2010 at 06:07 PM.
#130
MBWorld Fanatic!
Tell ya what. When your *****box runs 121mph in the 1/8 then you can call my evo a riced out *****box. Until then I'm done arguing with you on the internet because not only do I have nothing to prove you dont have anything for me. I dont agree with the OP's thread title or tactics but I also dont agree with the way you guys are attacking evo's just because he owns one. There are way too many narrow minded people on this forum. You gonna call the GT-R or Supra a ricer? To me a riced out vehicle is a single over head cam Honda that produces less than 100whp with a different colored body kit, huge wing, and guages.
Carry on....![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
Carry on....
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#133
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
I'm sure this has been said in all 5 pages of awesomeness, but they aren't even comparable.
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
#134
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm sure this has been said in all 5 pages of awesomeness, but they aren't even comparable.
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.
The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.
The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.
It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GT3
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
#136
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
![slap](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/slap.gif)
The new S4 is nice and IMO better than the C350 or the 335i.
#137
MBWorld Fanatic!
So now the GT-R is also a FAIL because its AWD. You see, you cant have your cake and eat it too. Which is it? Please tell me you think the GT-R is a riced out POS and fails as a track car because its AWD and Japanese. You my friend are a complete idiot, act 12yo, and have nothing to contribute to this forum. Your posts are based on your personal opinion and not personal experience. I'm done here. Anytime you want that ****box of yours to get its a$$ handed to it bring it to Florida
Road course, 1/4 mile, top end runs, you pick... I'm gonna warn you now, its gonna be painful and hard to stomache
LOL...
I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
#138
MBWorld Fanatic!
you're saying that when the GTR's 0-60 is 3.2 seconds, and a standing quarter mile at 11.6 STOCK? If you consider the R35 GTR slow, then what do you make of the C63? Just pondering...
Last edited by LawRens; 08-07-2010 at 09:22 PM.
#139
MBWorld Fanatic!
It's great off road with its AWD. If you are on the Rubicon Trail the GTR would be my go to car. But if you are on a track then clearly the C63 will dominate all other cars.
#140
MBWorld Fanatic!
5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html
And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#141
MBWorld Fanatic!
mmmm, makes sense i guess. Might be beating a dead horse here, but nurburgring times say GTR at 7m 29s, and C63 at 8m 33s?
5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html
And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html
And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#142
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
996tt Protomotive, C63
GTR 4wd does not mean for off road. On the track, stock-stock, it would eat C63 alive. No chance.
#143
MBWorld Fanatic!
#145
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
The C63 will get crushed on the track, road course or 1/4 by the GTR, it is not even a contest.
Of course the GTR was beat w/ an ugly stick and has a cheap interior....I would not take one over my C63 as a daily, but you can't argue w/ the performance.
A few are running in the 9's w/ just bolt ons.
Of course the GTR was beat w/ an ugly stick and has a cheap interior....I would not take one over my C63 as a daily, but you can't argue w/ the performance.
A few are running in the 9's w/ just bolt ons.
#148
MBWorld Fanatic!
![Angry](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon8.gif)
No, the GTR isn't a POS FAIL car, just your riced out Evo. You FAIL! Again, we don't give a crap about how fast your Evo is or that you take it to the track. Why do you keep bringing it up? Is that the only car you have? FAIL!
#149
MBWorld Fanatic!
Oh no, now we're going to have post after post on the GTR now. Still doesn't make the S4 better than the C63. The OP is still.....FAIL! And riced out Evos too.
#150
MBWorld Fanatic!