C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

c63< s4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-07-2010, 03:11 PM
  #126  
Member
 
aroonkl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996tt Protomotive, C63
Originally Posted by Most-Wanted
The Evo, S4, and C63 all have their place in this World. For me the evo is a track toy and either of the other two are nice daily's. If I lived in Vermont I would buy the S4. If I lived in South Florida I would buy the C63. And people like aroonki are just plain ignorant... Best of luck to the OP on whichever he chooses...
Dear friend. I did not say Evo is a bad car. I was not born with MB and P cars. My old car was once a Suby STI. I drove my friend's Evo. I liked them. It is simple logic. Not much money+fun car = EVO, STI, 350Z. There was nothing wrong. But keep bragging in another forum with diff perspective car, is annoying. Will they like you if you keep putting up ur MB is faster, cheaper in Rolls Royce or ur MB is more comfortable than Lambo at their forums? Try it.

Last edited by aroonkl; 08-07-2010 at 03:24 PM. Reason: correct
Old 08-07-2010, 04:10 PM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
I know Aroon and he is anything but ignorant.
Old 08-07-2010, 04:14 PM
  #128  
Senior Member
 
Dark_Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GT2 C63 and yo sister
i thought we werent talking to this guy anymore unless he posted pics of wife and car to prove hes not just a 15 yo who just got an ipad
Old 08-07-2010, 06:03 PM
  #129  
Senior Member
 
Most-Wanted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT3
Tell ya what. When your *****box runs 121mph in the 1/8 then you can call my evo a riced out *****box. Until then I'm done arguing with you on the internet because not only do I have nothing to prove you dont have anything for me. I dont agree with the OP's thread title or tactics but I also dont agree with the way you guys are attacking evo's just because he owns one. There are way too many narrow minded people on this forum. You gonna call the GT-R or Supra a ricer? To me a riced out vehicle is a single over head cam Honda that produces less than 100whp with a different colored body kit, huge wing, and guages.

Carry on....

Originally Posted by norb
What is your obsession with the Evo? We get it, you have a track prepped riced out Evo. Who the heck cares? No one here cares! All we care about is making fun of some idiot troll that keeps saying that the S4 is superior to the C63. Stop mentioning the Evo, we don't give a crap about it.

Last edited by Most-Wanted; 08-07-2010 at 06:07 PM.
Old 08-07-2010, 06:24 PM
  #130  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Most-Wanted
Tell ya what. When your *****box runs 121mph in the 1/8 then you can call my evo a riced out *****box. Until then I'm done arguing with you on the internet because not only do I have nothing to prove you dont have anything for me. I dont agree with the OP's thread title or tactics but I also dont agree with the way you guys are attacking evo's just because he owns one. There are way too many narrow minded people on this forum. You gonna call the GT-R or Supra a ricer? To me a riced out vehicle is a single over head cam Honda that produces less than 100whp with a different colored body kit, huge wing, and guages.

Carry on....
Jeezuz! Enough with the Evo already. No one cares! Really, we don't give a crap about your Evo! Talk about narrow minded, why can't you accept the fact that no one cares about your fancy riced out Evo. And really, an AWD track car? Really? FAIL!
Old 08-07-2010, 07:23 PM
  #131  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Maybe I just have low standards, but this thread is pretty good entertainment!
Old 08-07-2010, 07:55 PM
  #132  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Was ESP off? Can someone please post the AFRs?
Old 08-07-2010, 08:04 PM
  #133  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by MarcL4P
I'm sure this has been said in all 5 pages of awesomeness, but they aren't even comparable.

Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.

The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.

The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.


It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
^The Force is strong in this one.
Old 08-07-2010, 08:08 PM
  #134  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mr inkredibul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Midwest, US
Posts: 1,463
Received 72 Likes on 55 Posts
'17 GTR, '17 GLC43, '14 Panigale 899, '20 V4
Originally Posted by MarcL4P
I'm sure this has been said in all 5 pages of awesomeness, but they aren't even comparable.

Compare the C350 sport to the S4, in my opinion.

The C63 is more a comparision between the RS4, and then YES ther are several and very valid points for both cars.

The C63 in this situation is a no brainer. If you were truly looking at a C63 , the S4 wouldnt even be in the equation and you would compare it to the RS4.


It's like saying the CLK63 Blackseries < S5 ??????????????
This is so true...On page 5 I even posted that my competitive set was S4, S5, and C350 and guess what the C350 STILL won out.
Old 08-07-2010, 08:11 PM
  #135  
Senior Member
 
Most-Wanted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT3
Originally Posted by norb
Jeezuz! Enough with the Evo already. No one cares! Really, we don't give a crap about your Evo! Talk about narrow minded, why can't you accept the fact that no one cares about your fancy riced out Evo. And really, an AWD track car? Really? FAIL!
So now the GT-R is also a FAIL because its AWD. You see, you cant have your cake and eat it too. Which is it? Please tell me you think the GT-R is a riced out POS and fails as a track car because its AWD and Japanese. You my friend are a complete idiot, act 12yo, and have nothing to contribute to this forum. Your posts are based on your personal opinion and not personal experience. I'm done here. Anytime you want that ****box of yours to get its a$$ handed to it bring it to Florida Road course, 1/4 mile, top end runs, you pick... I'm gonna warn you now, its gonna be painful and hard to stomache LOL...

I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
Old 08-07-2010, 08:26 PM
  #136  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally Posted by mr inkredibul
This is so true...On page 5 I even posted that my competitive set was S4, S5, and C350 and guess what the C350 STILL won out.
sorry, but the C350 is not in the same league as the S4 or S5. not in terms of power, and not in terms of price either. sadly the C350 can't even compare to 335i.


The new S4 is nice and IMO better than the C350 or the 335i.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:16 PM
  #137  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GBlansten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thick Ascending Limb
Posts: 1,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
Originally Posted by Most-Wanted
So now the GT-R is also a FAIL because its AWD. You see, you cant have your cake and eat it too. Which is it? Please tell me you think the GT-R is a riced out POS and fails as a track car because its AWD and Japanese. You my friend are a complete idiot, act 12yo, and have nothing to contribute to this forum. Your posts are based on your personal opinion and not personal experience. I'm done here. Anytime you want that ****box of yours to get its a$$ handed to it bring it to Florida Road course, 1/4 mile, top end runs, you pick... I'm gonna warn you now, its gonna be painful and hard to stomache LOL...

I'm out, if you want to continue this conversation just pm me. I'm not gonna clutter up this thread any more. Its pointless.
I think the problem with the GTR is weight and its ponderously slow speed. Sure it is great for off roading but lol at getting that dog on a track. But I digress.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:20 PM
  #138  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LawRens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
43
Originally Posted by GBlansten
I think the problem with the GTR is weight and its ponderously slow speed. Sure it is great for off roading but lol at getting that dog on a track. But I digress.
you're saying that when the GTR's 0-60 is 3.2 seconds, and a standing quarter mile at 11.6 STOCK? If you consider the R35 GTR slow, then what do you make of the C63? Just pondering...

Last edited by LawRens; 08-07-2010 at 09:22 PM.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:21 PM
  #139  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GBlansten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thick Ascending Limb
Posts: 1,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
Originally Posted by thepinoc
you're saying that when the GTR's 0-60 is sub four seconds, and a standing quarter mile at 11.6? If you consider the GTR slow, then what do you make of the C63? Just pondering...
It's great off road with its AWD. If you are on the Rubicon Trail the GTR would be my go to car. But if you are on a track then clearly the C63 will dominate all other cars.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:25 PM
  #140  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LawRens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
43
Originally Posted by GBlansten
It's great off road with its AWD. If you are on the Rubicon Trail the GTR would be my go to car. But if you are on a track then clearly the C63 will dominate all other cars.
mmmm, makes sense i guess. Might be beating a dead horse here, but nurburgring times say GTR at 7m 29s, and C63 at 8m 33s?

5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html

And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
Old 08-07-2010, 09:42 PM
  #141  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GBlansten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thick Ascending Limb
Posts: 1,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
Originally Posted by thepinoc
mmmm, makes sense i guess. Might be beating a dead horse here, but nurburgring times say GTR at 7m 29s, and C63 at 8m 33s?

5 second google'd source
http://www.strikeengine.com/car-stat...ockenheim.html

And to maintain on topic: i personally feel the RS4 would be the better comparison to the C63... In a few years i might be looking into this debate further
Are you suggesting that I take my C63 offroad?
Old 08-07-2010, 09:47 PM
  #142  
Member
 
aroonkl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996tt Protomotive, C63
GTR 4wd does not mean for off road. On the track, stock-stock, it would eat C63 alive. No chance.
Originally Posted by GBlansten
It's great off road with its AWD. If you are on the Rubicon Trail the GTR would be my go to car. But if you are on a track then clearly the C63 will dominate all other cars.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:48 PM
  #143  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GBlansten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thick Ascending Limb
Posts: 1,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
Originally Posted by aroonkl
GTR 4wd does not mean for off road. On the track, stock-stock, it would eat C63 alive. No chance.
Sir, might I remind you of the C63's paltry approach angle. It must remain on our beloved roadways. It is not fit for the undulations and perturbations of the country.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:56 PM
  #144  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by SebringSilver
Maybe I just have low standards, but this thread is pretty good entertainment!
Yeup. Low standards Sebring. But never the less interesting. Same reason I watch Jersey Shore...
Old 08-07-2010, 10:18 PM
  #145  
Senior Member
 
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
The C63 will get crushed on the track, road course or 1/4 by the GTR, it is not even a contest.

Of course the GTR was beat w/ an ugly stick and has a cheap interior....I would not take one over my C63 as a daily, but you can't argue w/ the performance.

A few are running in the 9's w/ just bolt ons.
Old 08-07-2010, 10:31 PM
  #146  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by GBlansten
I think the problem with the GTR is weight and its ponderously slow speed. Sure it is great for off roading but lol at getting that dog on a track. But I digress.
Amazing how many bit on this one "hook, line and sinker"
Old 08-07-2010, 10:43 PM
  #147  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GBlansten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thick Ascending Limb
Posts: 1,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2017 BMW X5M DG/AB
Originally Posted by hhughes1
Amazing how many bit on this one "hook, line and sinker"


Just messing around.
Old 08-08-2010, 12:21 AM
  #148  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Angry

Originally Posted by Most-Wanted
Please tell me you think the GT-R is a riced out POS and fails as a track car because its AWD and Japanese.
No, the GTR isn't a POS FAIL car, just your riced out Evo. You FAIL! Again, we don't give a crap about how fast your Evo is or that you take it to the track. Why do you keep bringing it up? Is that the only car you have? FAIL!
Old 08-08-2010, 12:25 AM
  #149  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by GBlansten
I think the problem with the GTR is weight and its ponderously slow speed. Sure it is great for off roading but lol at getting that dog on a track. But I digress.
Oh no, now we're going to have post after post on the GTR now. Still doesn't make the S4 better than the C63. The OP is still.....FAIL! And riced out Evos too.
Old 08-08-2010, 02:54 AM
  #150  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LawRens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
43
Originally Posted by norb
Oh no, now we're going to have post after post on the GTR now. Still doesn't make the S4 better than the C63. The OP is still.....FAIL! And riced out Evos too.
Like adding fuel to the fire, but that last one really was like throwing the entire bucket in there...


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: c63< s4



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 AM.