C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need new rear tires...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-15-2010, 02:35 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by FBTO
Just got quoted $1390.47 all in for two p0 rears from the dealer. Taxes and installation included.
I paid $375 for 2 rear tires installed on my 2009.

Hanook V12's 275's. Awesome tire, lots of grip. I kept the Pzero on the fronts. You are paying WAY to much for a car that eats tires.

If I kept her long enough I was going to get a set of Dunlops next. Star spec.
Old 09-15-2010, 02:39 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
1Lop2K5C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
C63
Has anyone have experience on the Conti DW?
Old 09-15-2010, 02:45 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jvanbrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2017 Mini Cooper S Clubman ALL4 - British Racing Green
The DW is what I am most likely getting, they have them in 235/35 but no one has 245/35's (for the fronts), 265/35 and 275/35 are available for the rears. From what I have heard, and read, they are the best bang for your buck.. although that statement is subjective. I wonder.. anyone try 255's on the front

The DWS is also an awesome tire (all season some minor snow), but from what others have told me, not really good for tracking, although apparently they do drag in a straight line pretty well, and have long tire life.
Old 09-15-2010, 02:51 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by jvanbrecht
The DW is what I am most likely getting, they have them in 235/35 but no one has 245/35's (for the fronts), 265/35 and 275/35 are available for the rears. From what I have heard, and read, they are the best bang for your buck.. although that statement is subjective. I wonder.. anyone try 255's on the front

The DWS is also an awesome tire (all season some minor snow), but from what others have told me, not really good for tracking, although apparently they do drag in a straight line pretty well, and have long tire life.
Continentals run WIDE. I definitely would not advise putting 255's on the front. I would stick with 235's in the front and 265's in the rear IF you are running Continental DW's. Other then that, ive heard great things about the DW's.
Old 09-15-2010, 02:54 PM
  #30  
Member
 
Questions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by FBTO
Gonna stick with the p zero for now. Don't want to mix front and back profiles.
I did the same thing you did when my rears went, for the same reason. The whole time I've regretted getting P Zeros again and have been waiting for them to finish off so I can move on...

If I was doing it again, I would move on.
Old 09-15-2010, 03:01 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by Questions
I did the same thing you did when my rears went, for the same reason. The whole time I've regretted getting P Zeros again and have been waiting for them to finish off so I can move on...

If I was doing it again, I would move on.
Thats what i did also, I installed the Hankooks and never looked back at the Pirellis again. It was a waste of money to be honest.
Old 09-15-2010, 03:04 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
FBTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63
Originally Posted by propain
I paid $375 for 2 rear tires installed on my 2009.

Hanook V12's 275's. Awesome tire, lots of grip. I kept the Pzero on the fronts. You are paying WAY to much for a car that eats tires.

If I kept her long enough I was going to get a set of Dunlops next. Star spec.
Serious? For p zero's? Damn, might need to drive to buffalo for tires!!
Old 09-15-2010, 03:05 PM
  #33  
Member
 
Questions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by propain
I paid $375 for 2 rear tires installed on my 2009.

Hanook V12's 275's. Awesome tire, lots of grip. I kept the Pzero on the fronts. You are paying WAY to much for a car that eats tires.

If I kept her long enough I was going to get a set of Dunlops next. Star spec.
How did the V12s wear?

I was seriously considering the NT-05s for example, but after the comments in this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...my-nt-05s.html

--they're out.

The Dunlop Star Specs seem like a good choice, they did well here:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...r_spec_page_11

But pricing them out locally, they aren't too far off from the P Zeros...

I honestly want something really sticky.

Anyone know if you can mix drag radials in back with high performance summer street tires up front without ill effects?
Old 09-15-2010, 03:08 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Got the drag radials on now in back, hankooks up front. No problems on the street, work great at the 1/4 mile. You just can't be aggressive in the corners with the 285 drag radials.
Old 09-15-2010, 03:12 PM
  #35  
Member
 
Questions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Nice. Thanks Even Money.

How long have you been running the 555Rs? And no rubbing with passengers?
Old 09-15-2010, 03:21 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jvanbrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2017 Mini Cooper S Clubman ALL4 - British Racing Green
Originally Posted by _AMG_
Continentals run WIDE. I definitely would not advise putting 255's on the front. I would stick with 235's in the front and 265's in the rear IF you are running Continental DW's. Other then that, ive heard great things about the DW's.
That was a joke... I was not planning on running 255's up front :P
Old 09-15-2010, 04:38 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Originally Posted by Questions
Nice. Thanks Even Money.

How long have you been running the 555Rs? And no rubbing with passengers?
I've had this setup for about 3,000 miles, still decent tread left on the drag radials(only 8 passes at the strip), no rubbing, but haven't had passengers. I would add though, that there's almost no room left between the tire and the rear inner wheel well, just under an inch. So, it might rub with passengers.
Old 09-15-2010, 04:41 PM
  #38  
Member
 
Questions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Think 275s will be safe?
Old 09-15-2010, 05:06 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by _AMG_
I just got the Hankook Evo 275/35/18's installed in the rear, no rubbing at all. The surprising thing is, i was comparing the stock 255 Pzeros to the 275 Hankooks and there was only a 2mm difference in size. I used a digital caliper to measure both tires, the 255 pirellis measured 264mm and the 275 Hankooks measured 266mm.
Alot of people complain that the Pirellis are skinny tires but in reality they are pretty wide.
That's really good information. Thanks for sharing.

Based on your findings, perhaps 265's in some of the other brands are not any wider than the OEM P0's.

This is a good thread, though. It's helping me decide which tires I will eventually go with.
Old 09-15-2010, 05:09 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Raleighc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 260
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
Buyer Beware - Nitto's are only "W" speed rated up to 168mph.

If you plan to drive your car faster then 168mph you should get Y rated tires up to 186mph.
Old 09-15-2010, 07:54 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig
That's really good information. Thanks for sharing.

Based on your findings, perhaps 265's in some of the other brands are not any wider than the OEM P0's.

This is a good thread, though. It's helping me decide which tires I will eventually go with.
Very true....
I have seen 265's that actually run more narrow then the 255 Pzeros. Alot of people have this misconception about 265mm tires being wider then 255's, but that's not always the case.
Old 09-15-2010, 08:06 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by Questions
How did the V12s wear?

I was seriously considering the NT-05s for example, but after the comments in this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...my-nt-05s.html

--they're out.

The Dunlop Star Specs seem like a good choice, they did well here:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...r_spec_page_11

But pricing them out locally, they aren't too far off from the P Zeros...

I honestly want something really sticky.

Anyone know if you can mix drag radials in back with high performance summer street tires up front without ill effects?
V12's wear was nice and even. I put them on at 6K miles and sold my 09 at 12K+ and they had plenty of meat on them still. Id say you will get about 7-8K miles on them. They dont get as much grip as the Pzero but going to the 275 size puts a whole lot more rubber on the road so it makes up for it.

The sidewall however is not as hard as the Pzero's so I wouldn't advise them on the front tires.

This is my perfect plan for the C63. Get as much miles on the Pzero's as you can on the rears. Should be completely toast at 6K miles. I have another thread on this forum showing a pic of how bald it was. Change out to Hanook V12's and leave the Pzero's on the front. By the time the rear V12's go the front will be ready to change.

Swap all 4 for dunlop star specs. Get as much as you can out of the rears. Switch to another 2 Hanook V12 rears until the fronts are toast and swap again for another 4 Star Specs.

This system keeps the cost at a minimum and helps with getting into a weird tire change cycle. For at least 6K miles you will have all 4 tires brand new. The for 6K just the rears. I only do about 10K maybe less a year due to having multiple cars so this puts me at about $375 for the first year. $1700 a year after that.
Old 09-15-2010, 08:20 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by propain
V12's wear was nice and even. I put them on at 6K miles and sold my 09 at 12K+ and they had plenty of meat on them still. Id say you will get about 7-8K miles on them. They dont get as much grip as the Pzero but going to the 275 size puts a whole lot more rubber on the road so it makes up for it.

The sidewall however is not as hard as the Pzero's so I wouldn't advise them on the front tires.

This is my perfect plan for the C63. Get as much miles on the Pzero's as you can on the rears. Should be completely toast at 6K miles. I have another thread on this forum showing a pic of how bald it was. Change out to Hanook V12's and leave the Pzero's on the front. By the time the rear V12's go the front will be ready to change.

Swap all 4 for dunlop star specs. Get as much as you can out of the rears. Switch to another 2 Hanook V12 rears until the fronts are toast and swap again for another 4 Star Specs.

This system keeps the cost at a minimum and helps with getting into a weird tire change cycle. For at least 6K miles you will have all 4 tires brand new. The for 6K just the rears. I only do about 10K maybe less a year due to having multiple cars so this puts me at about $375 for the first year. $1700 a year after that.
Those are pretty good calculations.
Old 09-15-2010, 08:25 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
AlexCim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 Ultima GTR
I'm gonna get getting two sets of tires from TireRack this week.

I will get 1 x set of Yokohama ADVAN AD08's, and 1 x set of Bridgestone RE-11's. I will get 235/40s for the front, 265/35s for the rear.

Tire test: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=118
Customer reviews: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/survey...ay.jsp?type=EP
Other tires in Extreme Summer category: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/types/extremeperf.jsp
Old 09-15-2010, 09:20 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by _AMG_
Very true....
I have seen 265's that actually run more narrow then the 255 Pzeros. Alot of people have this misconception about 265mm tires being wider then 255's, but that's not always the case.
Would you mind sharing which tires that are made in 265 width actually are wider than 255 P0's?

I would like to get 265's but if it's true that 275's don't rub and if they fit well on the stock rear rims, I may go that route.
Old 09-15-2010, 10:38 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
AlexCim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 Ultima GTR
Actually, a 235/40 will have a similar sidewall size to 265/35. A 235/35 will look odder with a 265/35 on the rear

To explain, sidewall size (35 or 40 etc) is a percentage of width.

235/40 - 235 x 40% = 94mm sidewall
265/35 - 265 x 35% = 92.75mm sidewall

235/35 - 235 x 35% = 82.25mm sidewall

Certainly also, if you are going for different brands front/rear it also depends on the design of the tire and how much sidewall actually shows, regardless of the maths, but if you are using the same brand front and rear, id stick 235/40 and 265/35
Old 09-15-2010, 10:40 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jvanbrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2017 Mini Cooper S Clubman ALL4 - British Racing Green
Well... I just realized.. I have been sizing my tires completely wrong.. sizing the fronts as 235/35/18... when in reality.. and my own complete stupidity.. they are 235/40/18..

So.. I just checked, and the Conti DW's (not DWS) are available currently in 245/40/18 for a bump in the front size, and 275/35/18 in the rear at Tirerack....

Or am I completely missing the point with regards to tire sizing and should just shut up....
Old 09-15-2010, 10:42 PM
  #48  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by Raleighc63
Buyer Beware - Nitto's are only "W" speed rated up to 168mph.

If you plan to drive your car faster then 168mph you should get Y rated tires up to 186mph.
You are incorrect. The 285/35-18 Nitto NT 555R is Y-rated.
Old 09-15-2010, 10:58 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jvanbrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2017 Mini Cooper S Clubman ALL4 - British Racing Green
Okay, I realized that the second number was a percentage ratio... but I apparently did not actually run the numbers...

I was planning on bumping up tire sizes for both front and rears, 245 front and 275 in the rear.. but I had been using the 35% ratio value for both.

So based on the following
245/40/18 = 98mm
275/35/18 = 96.25mm
vs (what I thought I was doing correct)
235/40/18 = 94mm

Will that 4 mm really be that much of a visual difference or sizing problem??

ps.. sorry to derail the topic.. heh.. I am only replacing the rears write now, and thought 235 front 275 rear would look funny.. but I think I will go 275 rear anyways

Originally Posted by AlexCim
Actually, a 235/40 will have a similar sidewall size to 265/35. A 235/35 will look odder with a 265/35 on the rear

To explain, sidewall size (35 or 40 etc) is a percentage of width.

235/40 - 235 x 40% = 94mm sidewall
265/35 - 265 x 35% = 92.75mm sidewall

235/35 - 235 x 35% = 82.25mm sidewall

Certainly also, if you are going for different brands front/rear it also depends on the design of the tire and how much sidewall actually shows, regardless of the maths, but if you are using the same brand front and rear, id stick 235/40 and 265/35
Old 09-15-2010, 11:39 PM
  #50  
Member
 
Questions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Need new rear tires...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.