622 HP C63





Good luck at the track for the shakedown.

We only got four runs in and I can't drive in manual. I made one pass that was fairly clean and Ben got one run that was fairly clean. Here's the real kicker. My pass was 11.533 @ 128.11mpg and Ben's run was 11.533 @ 128.64mph. Yes, I said it. Both runs were EXACTLY the same times.

Mine - 60' was 1.838
1/8 mile - 7.636 @ 98.15mph
Ben's - 60' was 1.862
1/8 mile - 7.658 @ 98.88mph
Strangely similar.
The fourth and final pass we brought the nitrous in in first gear. That was a kick in the pants and it launched like a rocket with NO traction issues. However, it banged the limiter in every gear.
Its late and we'll get it ironed out.
We did have an issue with the nitrous I'll ask the nitrous guru's to answer. Every time we purged the nitrous we got a lot of air. Even back to back purges gave us a good bit of air. During all the runs it seemed like the nitrous was coming in and out but we can't prove that other than the seat of the pants feel. Suggestions on what the problem could have been?? Both bottles were freshly filled and had 1000psi on them at all times.
That's impressive that you were able to hit the bottles in 1st gear and still hook up. It must have really pulled you back in your seat.
So, you believe you weren't making the power out on the track tonight that you were making on the dyno with this setup?
How much is your MPH off from where you were hoping it would be? Or are you satisfied with the trap speed?
At least you will only see better times from here on.
Last edited by SonnyakaPig; Sep 4, 2010 at 01:16 AM.
I guess if you want to shift in Sport mode you have to strike a balance between making as much power as you can and staying below the torque-limits of the TCM/ECM.
Otherwise, you could just practice in Manual, but it's never going to be as consistent and a accurate as automatic.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Thanks for the kind words guys. We are really having fun and hopefully have good information for those that want to do it themselves later. This IS a BLAST!!

Just did some calculations. The 11.24 run (N/A) had a 3.38 0-60mph on the v-box. Then add the 7.29 which gets us to 130mph should equate to a 10.67 quarter mile minimum. Thats IF we can't improve on the 0-60 time which hopefully we can. There is HOPE!!
Last edited by Dads C63; Sep 4, 2010 at 06:25 PM.
I would have thought that with your son working for Andy at MHP as a forum salesperson that it would have ensured you get special treatment from Andy.
But to discuss the issue of automatic transmission related tuning, I suggest we move the discussion into it's own new thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...y-control.html
I would have thought that with your son working for Andy at MHP as a forum salesperson that it would have ensured you get special treatment from Andy.
But to discuss the issue of automatic transmission related tuning, I suggest we move the discussion into it's own new thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...y-control.html
I'm not sure what you are trying to start but leave my thread alone. My son has been helping Andy with Marketing because he's good at it. He is not a paid employee. Yes, we work closely putting this car together buts its setting records. We run across problems that no one else knows about because we are going places no one else has been. We will get the tranny problem solved.
Lets not let this thread digress so move on. We are having fun!!
I would have thought that with your son working for Andy at MHP as a forum salesperson that it would have ensured you get special treatment from Andy.
But to discuss the issue of automatic transmission related tuning, I suggest we move the discussion into it's own new thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...y-control.html
Last edited by MB_Forever; Sep 5, 2010 at 12:28 AM.
this is like a boxing match. the worse fighter will always win when fighting someone without arms.
how can someone call someone out on a place where they know the other cant come 2. shame on PC.
Last edited by mthis; Sep 5, 2010 at 12:38 AM.
RENNtech SLR: 6.65s


Stock SLR: 7.24s


Amazing times! It just goes to show how the SLR is built for high speed roll-ons. Even his SL65 with all the RENNtech mods ran a 7.48s...which isn't exactly slow...but can't compete with the mighty SLR.
Tom
RENNtech SLR: 6.65s


Stock SLR: 7.24s


Amazing times! It just goes to show how the SLR is built for high speed roll-ons. Even his SL65 with all the RENNtech mods ran a 7.48s...which isn't exactly slow...but can't compete with the mighty SLR.
Tom





Do you know if he has ever drag raced either of those cars? Gotta be crazy fast!




