Tuned C63 Vs E63
10-29-2010, 09:30 AM
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
Not 500 though, 490whp... But the tranny wasn't performing great. Rematch soon with a new tranny.
10-29-2010, 09:46 AM
#52
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-29-2010, 12:14 PM
#53
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-29-2010, 12:36 PM
#54
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-29-2010, 12:37 PM
#55
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-29-2010, 01:46 PM
#56
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
So there are 2 examples that run12.00 1/4 I walked Walked on more then a few e,s tuned and stock now when I say walked that's means to me slowly pulling awaynot getting bus lengths?? From all speeds.. I've faced a few like?? 4-5 at the track multiple runs. And they are not as fast stock or tuned?? Now u say header and exhaust.. I can only speak for my self which is header/tune I run away on e63's.. (disclaimer). This is my experience and opinion only I am not saying I don't like or think it's slow by any means. I'm not a hater I love all cars.. As for people I dislike most..
What was trying to say was that stock for stock: a healthy running E63 should be able to take a healthy running C63. This is shown by the video and timeslips on dragtimes of my car and oldgixxer's car. We have at least 2 completely stock E63s that are running 11.9 to 12.1 and trapping above 118 mph in two tracks that are located on two opposite sides of the country. I don't think there has been any stock C63 (on stock tires with stock filters and charcoals intact) running 11.9 @ 118 mph yet, has there been one?
When a tune is involved, things get a bit more complicated because the quality of the tune comes in play. However, if all things are equal (meaning same tune from same company, same driver, same conditions, etc....), then I believe things would start to favor the C63 due to the lighter weight and more aerodynamic chassis.
10-29-2010, 03:11 PM
#57
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-29-2010, 03:18 PM
#58
MBWorld Fanatic!
I respect your statement above, and I too am a fan of all performance cars.... I love hp and don't like to hate. In fact, the C63 is one of my favorite 63 out there right now
What was trying to say was that stock for stock: a healthy running E63 should be able to take a healthy running C63. This is shown by the video and timeslips on dragtimes of my car and oldgixxer's car. We have at least 2 completely stock E63s that are running 11.9 to 12.1 and trapping above 118 mph in two tracks that are located on two opposite sides of the country. I don't think there has been any stock C63 (on stock tires with stock filters and charcoals intact) running 11.9 @ 118 mph yet, has there been one?
When a tune is involved, things get a bit more complicated because the quality of the tune comes in play. However, if all things are equal (meaning same tune from same company, same driver, same conditions, etc....), then I believe things would start to favor the C63 due to the lighter weight and more aerodynamic chassis.
What was trying to say was that stock for stock: a healthy running E63 should be able to take a healthy running C63. This is shown by the video and timeslips on dragtimes of my car and oldgixxer's car. We have at least 2 completely stock E63s that are running 11.9 to 12.1 and trapping above 118 mph in two tracks that are located on two opposite sides of the country. I don't think there has been any stock C63 (on stock tires with stock filters and charcoals intact) running 11.9 @ 118 mph yet, has there been one?
When a tune is involved, things get a bit more complicated because the quality of the tune comes in play. However, if all things are equal (meaning same tune from same company, same driver, same conditions, etc....), then I believe things would start to favor the C63 due to the lighter weight and more aerodynamic chassis.
10-29-2010, 03:46 PM
#59
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Fair enough I'm not talking ***** just what I've seen but I can agree with you.. You guys have fast cars and are extremely good drivers.. Thanks for all the support.. Sometimes I wish I took my car to the track stock.. But to late now.. I guess we can start over when we jump into the next motor. Haha. And thanks again for the post last week hopefully we have another like that in a few weeks!!
Now get out there and hit some 10s
10-30-2010, 05:38 PM
#61
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yeah guys,
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
10-30-2010, 08:10 PM
#63
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yeah guys,
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
The fastest 2007 CLS63 on drag times is a 11.8 and thats with NOS.
Edit: I see most of the times on there are yours! LOL.. 12 flat... nice... still not beating a C63 with a tune and headers though. Going by the site you are tune only and running DR's? Nice times.
Last edited by propain; 10-30-2010 at 08:13 PM.
10-30-2010, 08:13 PM
#64
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yeah guys,
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
11-01-2010, 10:34 AM
#68
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
Yeah guys,
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
Dam hats off and much respect. You guys ran some hella times.
I ran two C63s one tuned, one tuned , headers and exhaust.
Neither beat me..
This is all on a NHRA sanctioned track , not rolling.
The C63 continues to impress, guess i just had trouble with the "walking" term as I reserve that for cars that move away "rapidly" at all points in the power band.
I have no clue what you have done to your CLS but if this is stock vs stock... IDK what a tune + headers C63 would do..
11-01-2010, 10:36 AM
#69
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 C63
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz1Z4...eature=related
I have no clue what you have done to your CLS but if this is stock vs stock... IDK what a tune + headers C63 would do..
I have no clue what you have done to your CLS but if this is stock vs stock... IDK what a tune + headers C63 would do..
11-01-2010, 08:04 PM
#70
MBWorld Fanatic!
You must have some serious work done to your 2007 4400lb CLS63 to beat a C63 with a tune and headers. What do you have done?
The fastest 2007 CLS63 on drag times is a 11.8 and thats with NOS.
Edit: I see most of the times on there are yours! LOL.. 12 flat... nice... still not beating a C63 with a tune and headers though. Going by the site you are tune only and running DR's? Nice times.
The fastest 2007 CLS63 on drag times is a 11.8 and thats with NOS.
Edit: I see most of the times on there are yours! LOL.. 12 flat... nice... still not beating a C63 with a tune and headers though. Going by the site you are tune only and running DR's? Nice times.
I pulled alot of weight off the car down to around 4150 lbs. Lighter wheels, no tools, spare. The car had evosport lighter pullies, relocated IAT sensor, filters, ECU tune . It consistantly dynoed at 430 RWHP 410 tq.
Also I use 100 octane.
To be fair the C63 drivers were new to 1/4 mile racing and put down decent times by the end of the day.
My buddies CLS 63 did go 11.69@124 on nitrous but he never posted his slip.
I think i squeezed my car to the max for the mod level.
I would fear the C63 in any trim as I am aware it is lighter and has similar hp. what can I do? Well tires, fuel, cooling, weight.. I had faster and quicker times and those C63's were pulling 1.8x 60 ft's.
My car is gone, sold but I will be at the next event with something stock. I beleive we have a few C63's in various mod levels, hopefully we can show you some video.
thanks for the compliments, good luck, keep pressing!
11-01-2010, 08:27 PM
#71
MBWorld Fanatic!
I pulled alot of weight off the car down to around 4150 lbs. Lighter wheels, no tools, spare. The car had evosport lighter pullies, relocated IAT sensor, filters, ECU tune . It consistantly dynoed at 430 RWHP 410 tq.
Also I use 100 octane.
To be fair the C63 drivers were new to 1/4 mile racing and put down decent times by the end of the day.
My buddies CLS 63 did go 11.69@124 on nitrous but he never posted his slip.
I think i squeezed my car to the max for the mod level.
I would fear the C63 in any trim as I am aware it is lighter and has similar hp. what can I do? Well tires, fuel, cooling, weight.. I had faster and quicker times and those C63's were pulling 1.8x 60 ft's.
My car is gone, sold but I will be at the next event with something stock. I beleive we have a few C63's in various mod levels, hopefully we can show you some video.
thanks for the compliments, good luck, keep pressing!
Also I use 100 octane.
To be fair the C63 drivers were new to 1/4 mile racing and put down decent times by the end of the day.
My buddies CLS 63 did go 11.69@124 on nitrous but he never posted his slip.
I think i squeezed my car to the max for the mod level.
I would fear the C63 in any trim as I am aware it is lighter and has similar hp. what can I do? Well tires, fuel, cooling, weight.. I had faster and quicker times and those C63's were pulling 1.8x 60 ft's.
My car is gone, sold but I will be at the next event with something stock. I beleive we have a few C63's in various mod levels, hopefully we can show you some video.
thanks for the compliments, good luck, keep pressing!
