Tuned C63 Vs E63
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
A modified E63 beyond a tune (500+ whp) will start walking the C63 up top. From about 125+ on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K-xs_KOODU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB0lPxaGyeY
But even a 500+ whp E63 wont beat a tuned C63 in the 1/4 mile or its gonna be damn close.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K-xs_KOODU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB0lPxaGyeY
But even a 500+ whp E63 wont beat a tuned C63 in the 1/4 mile or its gonna be damn close.
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Nah, I would think that a C63 running with or possibly beating a 'Vette Z06 would require a good tune + headers. I don't think a tuned-only (with or without secondary cats) would be close to a Z06 which typically runs the 1/4mi. in ~ mid-upper 11's @ 124mph.
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Hi Guys,
these are the official weights of both cars, according to AMG-Homepage:
2010 C63 1730 kilograms (3814 lbs)
2010 E63 1840 kilograms (4057 lbs)
So the E-Class is over 100kg heavier than the C. So it´s no surprice, that
a ecu tuned "C" is faster than a stock "E". But i think you couldn´t call it a
"walk"...
Best regards,
Daniel
these are the official weights of both cars, according to AMG-Homepage:
2010 C63 1730 kilograms (3814 lbs)
2010 E63 1840 kilograms (4057 lbs)
So the E-Class is over 100kg heavier than the C. So it´s no surprice, that
a ecu tuned "C" is faster than a stock "E". But i think you couldn´t call it a
"walk"...
Best regards,
Daniel
I removed the spare tire and floor mats.
Last edited by C63newdude; 10-28-2010 at 12:22 PM.
#35
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2021 Taycan Turbo, 2018 Radical SR3, 2021 Lincoln Aviator
A modified E63 beyond a tune (500+ whp) will start walking the C63 up top. From about 125+ on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K-xs_KOODU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB0lPxaGyeY
But even a 500+ whp E63 wont beat a tuned C63 in the 1/4 mile or its gonna be damn close.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K-xs_KOODU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB0lPxaGyeY
But even a 500+ whp E63 wont beat a tuned C63 in the 1/4 mile or its gonna be damn close.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
#39
Senior Member
I didn't want to post a different thread, what's the result of a rolling between tuned C63 and a stock M5 or M6. Also between a tuned + headers C63 and stock M5 or M6. I'm curious.
Any experience?
Any experience?
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
No chance unless they have the stroker motor in them. Full bolt on m6 Barely crack into the 11s a tuned headered c63 is fast. Go to dragtimes and do research.. It easy google the car and ad dragtimes (m6 dragtimes) or any car you want to no about and it'll tell you!!! A properly tuned c63 should easily break into 11s ad headers 11.5 or so..
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hong Kong/Charlotte
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C63
I don't know what the actual weight diff between a C and E is, but on a road course (Road Atlanta) it seems closer to a 400 lb diff than a 200 lb difference. The E63 is not a nimble car. (Neither is the C). Around a road course, a stock C would kill an E.
#42
Senior Member
No chance unless they have the stroker motor in them. Full bolt on m6 Barely crack into the 11s a tuned headered c63 is fast. Go to dragtimes and do research.. It easy google the car and ad dragtimes (m6 dragtimes) or any car you want to no about and it'll tell you!!! A properly tuned c63 should easily break into 11s ad headers 11.5 or so..
#44
MBWorld Fanatic!
O yea drag times post 60-130 allot?? That could be useful but highway runs most everyyone who knows something will say there not that fair! Someone always will get that quicker reaction on the gas!! Most of these cars you talk about will win one lose one in almost every story or video you watch?
Or even look up results from the Texas mile or Miami mile that should prove power?
Or even look up results from the Texas mile or Miami mile that should prove power?
Last edited by dodger63; 10-28-2010 at 11:57 PM.
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Hi Guys,
these are the official weights of both cars, according to AMG-Homepage:
2010 C63 1730 kilograms (3814 lbs)
2010 E63 1840 kilograms (4057 lbs)
So the E-Class is over 100kg heavier than the C. So it´s no surprice, that
a ecu tuned "C" is faster than a stock "E". But i think you couldn´t call it a
"walk"...
Best regards,
Daniel
these are the official weights of both cars, according to AMG-Homepage:
2010 C63 1730 kilograms (3814 lbs)
2010 E63 1840 kilograms (4057 lbs)
So the E-Class is over 100kg heavier than the C. So it´s no surprice, that
a ecu tuned "C" is faster than a stock "E". But i think you couldn´t call it a
"walk"...
Best regards,
Daniel
I weighted my car and throughout the past couple of years, I weighted a few W211 E63s and to date I have not found a single E63 that weights less than 4140 lbs. The average weight seemed to be around 4200 to 4250 lbs.
Last edited by MB_Forever; 10-29-2010 at 04:07 AM.
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
A modified E63 beyond a tune (500+ whp) will start walking the C63 up top. From about 125+ on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K-xs_KOODU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB0lPxaGyeY
But even a 500+ whp E63 wont beat a tuned C63 in the 1/4 mile or its gonna be damn close.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K-xs_KOODU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB0lPxaGyeY
But even a 500+ whp E63 wont beat a tuned C63 in the 1/4 mile or its gonna be damn close.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
By the way, which E63 has 500 whp?
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
The weights listed by Mercedes are a little tricky because they are supposed to be the weights of the car with standard featues ONLY (meaning without one single option) + half tank of gas. I can't speak for the 2010 E63, but for the 2007 to 2009 E63s, almost every single one came with the Premium 1 or Premium 2 packages, which adds about 120 lbs. If the car happened to have pano roof, then add another 120 lbs.
I weighted my car and throughout the past couple of years, I weighted a few W211 E63s and to date I have not found a single E63 that weights less than 4140 lbs. The average weight seemed to be around 4200 to 4250 lbs.
I weighted my car and throughout the past couple of years, I weighted a few W211 E63s and to date I have not found a single E63 that weights less than 4140 lbs. The average weight seemed to be around 4200 to 4250 lbs.
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Mo seems to be forgetting the fact his car and my car both when lined up heads up with tuned C63's had quicker and faster times. I believe the C63's in question were equipped with HEADERS and Exhaust.
The C63 was not "walking" the E63 or the CLS 63, nope.
We have another chance to run the cars coming soon. We will post up a vid of the STOCK E63 vs a C63 tune. I think you guys certainly have the advantage , but I dont call it "walking" its not enough to feel unchallenged, this is a driver determined race .
The C63 was not "walking" the E63 or the CLS 63, nope.
We have another chance to run the cars coming soon. We will post up a vid of the STOCK E63 vs a C63 tune. I think you guys certainly have the advantage , but I dont call it "walking" its not enough to feel unchallenged, this is a driver determined race .
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
Mo seems to be forgetting the fact his car and my car both when lined up heads up with tuned C63's had quicker and faster times. I believe the C63's in question were equipped with HEADERS and Exhaust.
The C63 was not "walking" the E63 or the CLS 63, nope.
We have another chance to run the cars coming soon. We will post up a vid of the STOCK E63 vs a C63 tune. I think you guys certainly have the advantage , but I dont call it "walking" its not enough to feel unchallenged, this is a driver determined race .
The C63 was not "walking" the E63 or the CLS 63, nope.
We have another chance to run the cars coming soon. We will post up a vid of the STOCK E63 vs a C63 tune. I think you guys certainly have the advantage , but I dont call it "walking" its not enough to feel unchallenged, this is a driver determined race .
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Mo seems to be forgetting the fact his car and my car both when lined up heads up with tuned C63's had quicker and faster times. I believe the C63's in question were equipped with HEADERS and Exhaust.
The C63 was not "walking" the E63 or the CLS 63, nope.
We have another chance to run the cars coming soon. We will post up a vid of the STOCK E63 vs a C63 tune. I think you guys certainly have the advantage , but I dont call it "walking" its not enough to feel unchallenged, this is a driver determined race .
The C63 was not "walking" the E63 or the CLS 63, nope.
We have another chance to run the cars coming soon. We will post up a vid of the STOCK E63 vs a C63 tune. I think you guys certainly have the advantage , but I dont call it "walking" its not enough to feel unchallenged, this is a driver determined race .