C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Nissan GTR vs c63 amg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-31-2010, 05:12 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
VCA_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
Stupid Nissan Altima with all wheel drive and stupid engine = Nissan GTR
They are ugly and over egaggerated. 80K+ for a NISSAN. A NISSAN!
You either have not driven one, are joking, or you do not appreciate world class sports cars, or all of the above.
Old 10-31-2010, 05:20 PM
  #27  
Administrator

 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,062
Received 512 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
Originally Posted by Raleighc63
Check out www.topgunrun.com results.

You will see that the tuned only c63's mine (MHP) and emerice (Eurocharged) beat 3 Nissan GTR's buy 10mph in the standing mile.

The gtr's are fast as hell in the 1/4 mile but our cars will catch, pass and then pull on them in the standing mile.

My standing mile time (best I can guess from the video) was 29.3 seconds 0-172mph...

Dads was faster than mine and had 9mph trap speed on me...
You're missing the point. Are you talking about a tuned C63 against a stock GTR? If so, then yes, I believe that could happen, But............if talking about a decently modified GTR....that aint gonna happen. The AMS GTR crossed the 1 mile finish line at 205 mph. Also, one just ran the 1/4 in 9.1 @ 163 mph.
Old 10-31-2010, 05:27 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by VCA_AMG
You either have not driven one, are joking, or you do not appreciate world class sports cars, or all of the above.
None of the above, all of the above, and nor do I give a Sh*t.
Old 10-31-2010, 05:28 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Raleighc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 260
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
Tuned c63 versus stock gtr. Those turbos are easy to tune...
Old 10-31-2010, 05:29 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Raleighc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 260
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
Stock gtr 0-170mph = 33 seconds.

Tuned c63 0-172mph = 29.3 seconds

Last edited by Raleighc63; 10-31-2010 at 05:49 PM.
Old 10-31-2010, 05:37 PM
  #31  
Super Member
 
RStevens63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63
Originally Posted by Rock
Downpipe/tune GTR = 10.9-11.1 @ 125-127mph. Plenty of documentation on that. Does this MHP C63 better those numbers?
Digs are not the same as rolls. People don't give enough credit to modded Cs up top, the higher the starting point the better off for the C.
Old 10-31-2010, 05:55 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Were are we going with this seems pointless... Happy holloween! Everyone don't eat candy gotta stay lean for mir
Old 10-31-2010, 06:21 PM
  #33  
Member
 
Savoy6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: austin,tx
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
09 C63
yeah why does it always have to be vs? both are awesome.
Old 10-31-2010, 07:01 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by Savoy6
yeah why does it always have to be vs? both are awesome.
I Agree both are cool cars.. Fast in there own right.. Very comparable in stock trim.. But as we all no turbo cars are very tuner friendly!
Old 10-31-2010, 07:05 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
VCA_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'15 E63S wagon
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
Stupid Nissan Altima with all wheel drive and stupid engine = Nissan GTR
They are ugly and over egaggerated. 80K+ for a NISSAN. A NISSAN!
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
None of the above, all of the above, and nor do I give a Sh*t.
This is readily apparent Reducing the GTR to an "Altima w/AWD and a 'stupid' engine" says enough. Carry on.
Old 10-31-2010, 07:05 PM
  #36  
Administrator

 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,062
Received 512 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
Originally Posted by Savoy6
yeah why does it always have to be vs? both are awesome.
Kumbaya anyone?

No one is saying that one is "better" than the other. I'm just saying that stock for stock, the GTR is faster and Mod vs Mod the GTR is faster (drag or race track).

BTW, I have stated numerous times that I would take a C63 over a GTR if I had to pick only one car to drive.
Old 10-31-2010, 07:11 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by Rock
Kumbaya anyone?

No one is saying that one is "better" than the other. I'm just saying that stock for stock, the GTR is faster and Mod vs Mod the GTR is faster (drag or race track).

BTW, I have stated numerous times that I would take a C63 over a GTR if I had to pick only one car to drive.
Yeah, hes not saying that one is "better" hes just saying the GTR is better in every way.


Love these threads... The vid however tells all. The GTR got beat by a C63 with a tune. Ill take that to the bank any day. Stock GTR or Tuned GTR. Your talking about a 25K price difference and no one is buying the GTR or the C63 for its looks.
Old 10-31-2010, 07:24 PM
  #38  
Member
 
87C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes C63
Here is a video of 2 friends in sweden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVd8J8KeUyo

GT-R is stock but has titan exhuast from DP.
C63 Techtec stage 1 whit secondery cats removed.
Old 10-31-2010, 07:31 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by 87C63
Here is a video of 2 friends in sweden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVd8J8KeUyo

GT-R is stock but has titan exhuast from DP.
C63 Techtec stage 1 whit secondery cats removed.
It's real funny that everyone on this forum believes everything they see on tv
Old 10-31-2010, 07:36 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
AlbertM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63 AMG 2010, Black, Pano, P2
Guys, what do you think about this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8O5n...eature=related

or this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fWCF...eature=related

Impressive

Last edited by AlbertM; 10-31-2010 at 07:40 PM.
Old 10-31-2010, 07:45 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
c63canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c63 amg
Originally Posted by Djovovic63
That's why every time I get the urge to buy or change my C63 for a gtr I decide not to.

The c63 is my daily driver. 4 doors. Super comfy. Amazing sound...And it rips. long live the C63. Best bang for your buck.



When I find a better car for about the same price as the C63 I will buy it.

I'm out.
Old 10-31-2010, 08:11 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by propain
Yeah, hes not saying that one is "better" hes just saying the GTR is better in every way.


Love these threads... The vid however tells all. The GTR got beat by a C63 with a tune. Ill take that to the bank any day. Stock GTR or Tuned GTR. Your talking about a 25K price difference and no one is buying the GTR or the C63 for its looks.
Exactly.
Old 10-31-2010, 08:25 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dads C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
2014 Audi RS7
Originally Posted by dodger63
It's real funny that everyone on this forum believes everything they see on tv
Hey Dodger63,
You cannot compare your DTC with a GTR.
Old 10-31-2010, 08:27 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
Originally Posted by VCA_AMG
This is readily apparent Reducing the GTR to an "Altima w/AWD and a 'stupid' engine" says enough. Carry on.

Listen here almighty authority and kiss a** of the NISSAN GTR: It does nothing for me. NOTHING. I have driven one, I have spent some time just esthetically/cosmetically, engineering-ly, and value-wise taking it apart in my mind and considering it. I have held my own in keeping up with its data, capabilities and reviews. ITS NOT ALL THAT. It does fine for itself, but its a hair on my nut s*ck when I compare it to other cars in that price range or even my MEASLY little C63 and it's capabilities. Everytime I see one I think nothing of it. IT LOOKS LIKE A DRESSED UP ALTIMA IN MY OPINION.
So I came here to state my opinion on it. You got a problem with that? I am not interested in taking any of your snippy remarks as if I am some highschool ricer kid or interested in having a forum debate on why I think what I think and I can give two Sh*ts what your assessment is on my opinion on the GTR.

Have a great Halloween and enjoy the rest of your Sunday night.
Old 10-31-2010, 08:58 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
wankeldude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
Listen here almighty authority and kiss a** of the NISSAN GTR: It does nothing for me. NOTHING. I have driven one, I have spent some time just esthetically/cosmetically, engineering-ly, and value-wise taking it apart in my mind and considering it. I have held my own in keeping up with its data, capabilities and reviews. ITS NOT ALL THAT. It does fine for itself, but its a hair on my nut s*ck when I compare it to other cars in that price range or even my MEASLY little C63 and it's capabilities. Everytime I see one I think nothing of it. IT LOOKS LIKE A DRESSED UP ALTIMA IN MY OPINION.
So I came here to state my opinion on it. You got a problem with that? I am not interested in taking any of your snippy remarks as if I am some highschool ricer kid or interested in having a forum debate on why I think what I think and I can give two Sh*ts what your assessment is on my opinion on the GTR.

Have a great Halloween and enjoy the rest of your Sunday night.
If that's your opinion, remind me to completely ignore all of your posts going forward. The GTR is an engineering delight. It performs in ALL ASPECTS better than a 997 TT. So while it may be subjectively ugly as sin, it is OBJECTIVELY "engineering-ly" and "value-wise" stellar.
Old 10-31-2010, 09:03 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Damn I didnt realize a tuned C63 is that fast topend I'm dying to run a stock GTR from a roll.
Old 10-31-2010, 09:25 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Faris63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'13 CLS63 PP
WOW ! after I saw this video I think I will keep my C63 and get MHP headers/tune

Because I had accident yesterday and I was thinking to trade my C63 with GT-R '11 next week if I get a good deal on it.
Old 10-31-2010, 09:42 PM
  #48  
Administrator

 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,062
Received 512 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
I have held my own in keeping up with its data, capabilities and reviews. ITS NOT ALL THAT. It does fine for itself, but its a hair on my nut s*ck when I compare it to other cars....
I find it fascinating that you equate a twin turbo, all-wheel-drive super-car to one of your nut hairs. An interesting association to say the least.

Please show me the "data" where a stock C63 outruns a stock GTR. Also show me an "Andy (MHP) C63" that runs a 205 mph mile or a 1/4 mile in 9.1 @ 163.

This is my final post in this thread (unless someone says something stupid).

The bottom line is that if you need to get from point A to point B ASAP, you pick the GTR. If that is not your sole mission, the AMG gets the nod.
Old 10-31-2010, 11:12 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by Dads C63
Hey Dodger63,
You cannot compare your DTC with a GTR.
I no! I'm trying not to.. Look I've said it 100 times I'm a car lover all cars.. I need at this point 1 car to solve 2 problems my obsessive speed problem an a practical 4 door let's compare apples to apples.. And stop bad mouthing great cars.. Gtr is great c63 is great?!!?!?!! Tell you one thing my kids are very easy to load into the c.. And guys at the track give it props for running consistent 11.4s....
Old 10-31-2010, 11:54 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kindafast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W210 E55 & W204 C63
They might be spraying the C63, but stock GTR's aren't that fast at all from a roll.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Nissan GTR vs c63 amg



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.