C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Technical Question: A/F Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
Muskoka_AMG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 2
2008 C63
Technical Question: A/F Ratio

Hi everyone,

This is the first naturally aspirated car I have owned, and after seeing the dyno graphs from almost everyone's tune, I must have something wrong. From my experience with turbo cars, the ideal A/F ratio is somewhere mid to high 11's, and anything above that tends to be unreliable.

However, every tune I see for the C63 seems to have AFR's in the high 12s low 13s area. I must have something wrong. Is it the fact that the car is naturally aspirated that allows it to have a higher afr that is safe, or is it compression ratio? Perhaps something else?

A little clarification would be appreciated!
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
Mort's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 484
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Max power at WOT should be in the 13:1 AFR area with modern engine and head construction methods. The higher the compression ratio the higher the fuel octane rating that will be required to avoid detonation. This will also be affected by spark timing at WOT. For safety sake the AFR will be set in the 12.2:1 to 12.8:1 area depending on spark timing and fuel quality octane speaking. There will be a balance of spark timing and AFR to achieve max power depending on piston & head design, compression ratio and exhaust tuning. Heat is the killer.

In FI the air is compressed before it enters the engine and this creates huge amounts of heat that must be dissipated as much as possible because it is an engine killer. For this reason it is usual to run 11.5:1 AFR or even lower depending on type of FI, quality of fuel, spark timing, engine design, etc. The richer mixture adds a safety margin to avoid detonation and adds extra fuel to cool the intake charge and the combustion cylinders. Max power is then set using boost pressure and spark timing and AFR is set to allow a safety margin and to help cool the cylinders.

The combination of these factors to achieve max power is determined by experience and tuning and testing while maintaining a reasonable safety factor depending on a persons risk aversion. After a while acceptable ranges are developed for a particular package and what is perceived as acceptable risk. These ranges must be tightened down by tuning and testing to achieve max power within a persons goals and risk aversion.

Disclaimer: I am not a tuner and the above is intended to be a general discussion only.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #3  
SonnyakaPig's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 3
MB
Very informative post, Mort.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
BFNYM156's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Canada
M156 and LS7
good explanation

Originally Posted by Mort
Max power at WOT should be in the 13:1 AFR area with modern engine and head construction methods. The higher the compression ratio the higher the fuel octane rating that will be required to avoid detonation. This will also be affected by spark timing at WOT. For safety sake the AFR will be set in the 12.2:1 to 12.8:1 area depending on spark timing and fuel quality octane speaking. There will be a balance of spark timing and AFR to achieve max power depending on piston & head design, compression ratio and exhaust tuning. Heat is the killer.

In FI the air is compressed before it enters the engine and this creates huge amounts of heat that must be dissipated as much as possible because it is an engine killer. For this reason it is usual to run 11.5:1 AFR or even lower depending on type of FI, quality of fuel, spark timing, engine design, etc. The richer mixture adds a safety margin to avoid detonation and adds extra fuel to cool the intake charge and the combustion cylinders. Max power is then set using boost pressure and spark timing and AFR is set to allow a safety margin and to help cool the cylinders.

The combination of these factors to achieve max power is determined by experience and tuning and testing while maintaining a reasonable safety factor depending on a persons risk aversion. After a while acceptable ranges are developed for a particular package and what is perceived as acceptable risk. These ranges must be tightened down by tuning and testing to achieve max power within a persons goals and risk aversion.

Disclaimer: I am not a tuner and the above is intended to be a general discussion only.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 08:53 PM
  #5  
Muskoka_AMG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 2
2008 C63
Thanks for the explanation!

Does anyone have an idea when detonation starts to occur on a C63? I realize there are many different factors here, but assuming average temperature, 93 octane pump gas, etc.

The reason for all of these questions, is I am considering buying a tune in the spring, but I want to make sure that I'm getting something safe.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
BFNYM156's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Canada
M156 and LS7
generally speaking low load, low rpm, hot ambient temperautre

Originally Posted by Muskoka_AMG
Thanks for the explanation!

Does anyone have an idea when detonation starts to occur on a C63? I realize there are many different factors here, but assuming average temperature, 93 octane pump gas, etc.

The reason for all of these questions, is I am considering buying a tune in the spring, but I want to make sure that I'm getting something safe.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
badu's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
delete

Last edited by badu; Nov 18, 2010 at 09:11 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 09:12 PM
  #8  
Muskoka_AMG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 2
2008 C63
Originally Posted by badu
AFR seems to suggest Air to Fuel ration, so does 11.5 mean 11.5 parts of air, 1 part of fuel? In that case, running 11.5 is actually richer than running 13 right?

Yes, the more air compared to fuel generally leads to more power, but more chance of detonation.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #9  
badu's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Muskoka_AMG
Yes, the more air compared to fuel generally leads to more power, but more chance of detonation.
I'm sorry for my newbie question, but this seems a bit counter-intuitive. Doesn't more fuel provide more power since air doesn't have any energy content?

Thanks for the great lesson
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #10  
Muskoka_AMG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 2
2008 C63
Originally Posted by badu
I'm sorry for my newbie question, but this seems a bit counter-intuitive. Doesn't more fuel provide more power since air doesn't have any energy content?

Thanks for the great lesson
You're asking the wrong person for a chemistry lesson! But seeing as this is the internet, and regardless how dangerously unqualified I am, I can give an explanation (and someone else can correct me!).

Fuel on it's own, won't ignite. Fuel with a limited quantity of air will catch fire. Fuel with unlimited quantity of air, will be even more intense.

A real world explanation is when you have a fire drill at work, the first thing they tell you is to close all your doors behind you. This is to restrict air flow to any potential fire, which slows the spread of fire.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #11  
EUGENE-Taiwan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Taiwan
Supercharged E92 M3
great info here!
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #12  
BFNYM156's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Canada
M156 and LS7
SI engine, gasoline fuel for stoichiometric combustion, A/F ratio is 14.7, more air(A/F>14.7, lamda> 1) is lean burn, slightly lean burn will give you better fuel efficiency (think diesel engine case), but if the charge(air-fuel mixture) is too lean, you need higher ignition energy(ie. plasma), slightly rich, will give you better power, too rich, you just dump fuel into the exhaust, rise TWC temperature, if too much rich, the charge may not get ignited (ie. A/F ~8-9)
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 09:30 AM
  #13  
Mort's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 484
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by Muskoka_AMG
Thanks for the explanation!

Does anyone have an idea when detonation starts to occur on a C63? I realize there are many different factors here, but assuming average temperature, 93 octane pump gas, etc.

The reason for all of these questions, is I am considering buying a tune in the spring, but I want to make sure that I'm getting something safe.
I think 12.7:1 - 12.8:1 is about as lean as you want to go at WOT and would personaly opt for 12.5:1 to reduce risk for a DD. THE ECU should protect the engine and pull timing and maybe add fuel if detonation is detected from bad fuel or for whatever reason. For racing you should monitor for KR and set max timing on the DYNO. At the track you monitor for KR and play with timing and fuel to see which combination nets you the best time and correspondingly the best usable power. When you get KR you back off a little to add a safety margin and help control risk.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 09:55 AM
  #14  
Mort's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 484
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by BFNYM156
generally speaking low load, low rpm, hot ambient temperautre
While this is certainly true and the ping we can hear at times, it is not the detonation that will kill an engine quickly. This detonation may damage an engine over time if not corrected by reducing timing, improving cooling or using a higher octane or better quality fuel, which is the usual cure. This detonation can be contained by reducing throttle angle or shifting down a cog as our 7 speed autos will do. Also why they say not to LUG an engine because it builds cylinder pressure which can damage piston crowns, connecting rods and rod bearing and crankshaft bearing surfaces.

Unrestrained detonation at WOT on the other hand can and will damage an engine in a very short period of time. This type of detonation may not be as audible due to ambient nose from the intake, combustion, exhaust and drive train. Heat is generated very quickly and damage to pistons, rods and heads can happen in a matter of a few seconds. Thus the need to avoid detonation at WOT by building in reasonable safety margins in a tune.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010 | 10:06 AM
  #15  
Mort's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 484
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by badu
I'm sorry for my newbie question, but this seems a bit counter-intuitive. Doesn't more fuel provide more power since air doesn't have any energy content?

Thanks for the great lesson
No, too much fuel will cause an engine to bog and reduce power drastically. The cylinder will fill with fuel that will not be burnt and will resist atomization and compression, it will cool the cylinder below optimum operating temperature and will be lazy to move out of the cylinder to allow the new mixture to enter. This is probably oversimplified but overly rich fuel mixtures do not make power but quite the opposite. The same is true for mixtures that are too lean on the other end of the scale.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.

story-0
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's new electric GT 4-Door Coupe trades combustion for software, synthetic noise, and more than 1,100 horsepower.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 20:08:15


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-2
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-5
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-6
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-9
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE