C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Nissan GTR or C63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-07-2011, 09:12 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Muskoka_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2008 C63
Buy the GTR. If you don't like it, I'll trade you my C63 for it!
Old 01-07-2011, 10:20 AM
  #27  
Super Member
 
Chocofishez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 723
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2014 E63 S
You definitely owe it to yourself to look at a 997 turbo. I have driven neither, but they are compared as often as the M3 and C63 so it just makes sense to give it a good look. Either way you're in for an exciting car. Congrats!
Old 01-07-2011, 10:56 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by vcruiser
So it's time for a new car. Lease is up on the c350.
We have a c63 at our summer house, and i love it.
but ive driven a w204 for 3 years now, and i kinda want a completely different model to drive. So i've considered the Nissan GTR which also is all wheel drive for our crappy winters.

What do you guys think? have you driven them?
I will test drive it after the holidays!
I think I have a unique perspective here, since I've driven stock and tuned versions of both cars on the street and on several tracks (drag strip and road course) as well as road trips (3 hrs. each way in a Switzer tuned GTR and more in a RENNtech 63).

That said, they're very different cars. The C63 is a tail-sliding muscle car, the GTR is every bit the numb, robotic experience you've read about. It is brutally fast, and I doubt the best drivers I've been around (Shane Lewis, Tommy Kendall, etc.) in the C63 could catch me (I can't drive for s***) in a GTR on a road course.

If you want to have fun and enjoy/scare yourself: C63. If you want to break track records: GTR.
Old 01-07-2011, 10:57 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by Chocofishez
You definitely owe it to yourself to look at a 997 turbo. I have driven neither, but they are compared as often as the M3 and C63 so it just makes sense to give it a good look. Either way you're in for an exciting car. Congrats!
Again: several 997 TT at Switzer, and all I can say is that the car was a major disappointment. Wouldn't consider a P-car after spending time in the GTR.
Old 01-07-2011, 11:52 AM
  #30  
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,597
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Originally Posted by Speedriven
Again: several 997 TT at Switzer, and all I can say is that the car was a major disappointment. Wouldn't consider a P-car after spending time in the GTR.
So u saying a Switzer p800 997 turbo gets beat on by a Switzer p800 GTR?

what about the new pdks? they have some wicked numbers with them now
Old 01-07-2011, 11:59 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by Zod
So u saying a Switzer p800 997 turbo gets beat on by a Switzer p800 GTR?

what about the new pdks? they have some wicked numbers with them now
Not in a straight line, but everywhere else? Yes.

Also: the new PDKs can't handle the big power that the early cars (2007-09) can. The 996 TT and 997.1 TT engines were derived from the GT1 block, whereas the "new" PDK motor is a corporate 6, with more in common (per Switzer) with the Boxster than any of the GT units.

PDK is le fail. Fast in stock form, but not up to serious modding without significant internal upgrades, and - even then - the case might let you down. tym even bought a PDK development car while I was there, but looked into it and eventually just sold it: wasn't worth developing a package on.
Old 01-07-2011, 12:34 PM
  #32  
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,597
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Originally Posted by Speedriven
Not in a straight line, but everywhere else? Yes.

Also: the new PDKs can't handle the big power that the early cars (2007-09) can. The 996 TT and 997.1 TT engines were derived from the GT1 block, whereas the "new" PDK motor is a corporate 6, with more in common (per Switzer) with the Boxster than any of the GT units.

PDK is le fail. Fast in stock form, but not up to serious modding without significant internal upgrades, and - even then - the case might let you down. tym even bought a PDK development car while I was there, but looked into it and eventually just sold it: wasn't worth developing a package on.
How is it that the GTR gear boxes can handle moding then?
or are they upgraded?
i ask as the car has sparked some interest for me

Thanks
Old 01-07-2011, 12:38 PM
  #33  
Member
 
shchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hainesport, NJ
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 CTS-V (6spd, phantom grey), 2010 Cadillac Escalade ESV (black raven)
I would probably consider a used 997 GT3 for under 100k...
Old 01-07-2011, 01:06 PM
  #34  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GT-R + P1000 =
Old 01-07-2011, 01:09 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by Zod
How is it that the GTR gear boxes can handle moding then?
or are they upgraded?
i ask as the car has sparked some interest for me

Thanks
P800 is the highest hp level Switzer offers with the factory trans. TQ is limited electronically to keep the trans. together, and the linear power curve limits the load on the gears (stays within 5% load between up shifts).

The PDK issue isn't the trans., it's the cheaper engine internals. Porsche really pulled a fast one.
Old 01-07-2011, 01:09 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by JamE55
GT-R + P1000 =
No P1000 kit, R1K. P = pump gas, R = race gas. R1000 kit makes about 800 on pump.
Old 01-07-2011, 01:17 PM
  #37  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Speedriven
No P1000 kit, R1K. P = pump gas, R = race gas. R1000 kit makes about 800 on pump.
That's what i meant. It's funny because the R1K cost as much as a used GT-R. lol!
Old 01-07-2011, 02:08 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by JamE55
That's what i meant. It's funny because the R1K cost as much as a used GT-R. lol!
The same can be said of lots of tuning packages. Look at it another way: you're 65k into the car, and 65k into the R1K ... but what else can run with that car?
Old 01-07-2011, 02:10 PM
  #39  
Out Of Control!
 
JamE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA, NV, CO
Posts: 21,005
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Speedriven
The same can be said of lots of tuning packages. Look at it another way: you're 65k into the car, and 65k into the R1K ... but what else can run with that car?
Very true. What's a good year to do these types of packages on? 09? 10?
Old 01-07-2011, 02:54 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by JamE55
Very true. What's a good year to do these types of packages on? 09? 10?
I'd go for an '09.
Old 01-08-2011, 10:12 AM
  #41  
GMW
Super Member
 
GMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UG
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 ML63 AMG PP
I like the GTR but as far as the sound of the exhaust goes, the C63 is one of the all time greats! Also a tuned C63 is very, very fast. That said a tuned GTR is a psycho with headlights!
Old 01-08-2011, 10:26 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by GMW
I like the GTR but as far as the sound of the exhaust goes, the C63 is one of the all time greats! Also a tuned C63 is very, very fast. That said a tuned GTR is a psycho with headlights!
http://www.streetfire.net/video/swit...ker_714112.htm
Old 01-08-2011, 01:13 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
I'd vote R35 GT-R as well. Switzer and AMS both make extremely impressive, brutally quick/fast upgrade packages for that car.

Speeddriven - when you're referring to the 997TTs that were disappointing, are you including 997.1TTs like their Sledgehammer development car, and any of their R911 cars?
Old 01-08-2011, 01:16 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
I'd vote R35 GT-R as well. Switzer and AMS both make extremely impressive, brutally quick/fast upgrade packages for that car.

Speeddriven - when you're referring to the 997TTs that were disappointing, are you including 997.1TTs like their Sledgehammer development car, and any of their R911 cars?
Yes, I am.
Old 01-10-2011, 09:19 AM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
vcruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2013 G63 AMG
Thanks for all the input!

I won't be tuning the GTR if i get that. I'd only put on an aggressive sounding exhaust and the rest would be cosmetic upgrades and a well done custom leather interior.

Also, it would be a used GTR, probably an 09 around the 65k-70k price range, so a 997 turbo is definitely out of the question.
Old 01-10-2011, 01:05 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by austinholloman
997 Turbo is not a fun car to keep running and almost all engine work requires dropping the engine out of the car to work on it. 997 is an AMAZING car but you GTR is still the better everyday car. Does Nissan offer any maintenance packages for the GTR or are you on your own, if so, that would really put it ahead of the 997.
I'd suggest you stop speaking about things you have absolutely no clue about
Old 01-10-2011, 02:23 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
emericr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes on 133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
Speedriven: just a perspective that Dad's C63 at the same event in Miami in March ran 182mph.
That seems to be the same as that P800. And the sound of his car compared to that P800 is like apples and oranges.
I am not debating that that GTR P800 would spank the C63 in any other event.
Old 01-10-2011, 02:28 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
Speedriven1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 2,542
Received 72 Likes on 62 Posts
Speedriven
Originally Posted by emericr
Speedriven: just a perspective that Dad's C63 at the same event in Miami in March ran 182mph.
That seems to be the same as that P800. And the sound of his car compared to that P800 is like apples and oranges.
I am not debating that that GTR P800 would spank the C63 in any other event.
That P800 ran 191 and 194 (GPS) on all-season tires, 93 octane pump gas, and a slipping clutch. According to the "radar gun" the car was a bit quicker, but I'm not sure those guys knew what they were doing. The P800s (2 cars, again on pump gas tunes) ran 194-195 at other events later that year.

In any event, hardly comparable cars, IMO. My understanding was that Dad's car was running race gas, and I know it was taped up and running superior tires, so it was coming out of the box harder.

That doesn't take anything away from Dad's C63 or the C63 in general. Stock to stock I'd take the C63, and even tuned I would rather own the Benz ... just sayin' the P800 would rock the C63 on just about any track. That's life.
Old 01-10-2011, 02:47 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
emericr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes on 133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
I stand corrected. I just watched the video you linked and it stated the car ran 180ish.
I agree with you that both cars stock or tuned are not comparable.
If you want bragging rights for being the fastest, then the GTR is your weapon.
I personally prefer the C63 because it is more fun and I sometimes need to carry more than 2 adults.
The fun factor of the C is not negligible either. Powersliding through corners is so much fun and probably the reason why so many of us change tires every 5K miles.
Old 01-10-2011, 03:04 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chawkins2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,659
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
2006 E55 AMG
Get the new gt500, install a kenne belle 4.0 blower upgrade and expect around 800rwhp and 9 sec 1/4 mile times for half the cost.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Nissan GTR or C63



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.