Supercharged C63 703hp/878nm VID!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
...and a 1.55 ain't gonna make your "header and tune only" car do extreme low 10's and you should have soap put in your mouth for even mentioning 9s.
Post some slips big guy!
and
were you running nos when you got the 1.55?
All we need to know is what a stock c63 puts out on that brand of dyno
Unless the people making the supercharger have no idea that dynos are all about the area under the curve then they should have a stock c63 run to compare it to
Then the armchair dyno guys can look at the relative differences between the curves and see how a stock c63 run on that brand compares to dynojet
This is easier than waiting for a kit to be fitted in the USA and tested on a dynojet
ESS have a dynojet so it will be interesting to see what each puts out on a dynojet
I mist be the only person here that thinks that drag times Are the least relevant information because it is too hard to ensure consistency between drivers, grip and ambient temperature etc etc
What we really need are rear wheel curves on a dynojet and the DRF files to let consumers compare in the one graph
All cars log air fuels, all cars compared SAE, boost logged and graphed and the other things kept constant I have forgotten about or dont know about
Last edited by sorrentoguy; Feb 13, 2011 at 04:12 AM.
All we need to know is what a stock c63 puts out on that brand of dyno
Unless the people making the supercharger have no idea that dynos are all about the area under the curve then they should have a stock c63 run to compare it to
Then the armchair dyno guys can look at the relative differences between the curves and see how a stock c63 run on that brand compares to dynojet
This is easier than waiting for a kit to be fitted in the USA and tested on a dynojet
ESS have a dynojet so it will be interesting to see what each puts out on a dynojet
I mist be the only person here that thinks that drag times Are the least relevant information because it is too hard to ensure consistency between drivers, grip and ambient temperature etc etc
What we really need are rear wheel curves on a dynojet and the DRF files to let consumers compare in the one graph
All cars log air fuels, all cars compared SAE, boost logged and graphed and the other things kept constant I have forgotten about or dont know about
Here is the dyno figures of the C63 before the supercharger istallation.
On this dyno run the car has Kleemann ECU upgrade, Kleemann Large Throttle kit and MBH longtube headers.
Best Regards Lars K
All we need to know is what a stock c63 puts out on that brand of dyno
Unless the people making the supercharger have no idea that dynos are all about the area under the curve then they should have a stock c63 run to compare it to
Then the armchair dyno guys can look at the relative differences between the curves and see how a stock c63 run on that brand compares to dynojet
This is easier than waiting for a kit to be fitted in the USA and tested on a dynojet
ESS have a dynojet so it will be interesting to see what each puts out on a dynojet
I mist be the only person here that thinks that drag times Are the least relevant information because it is too hard to ensure consistency between drivers, grip and ambient temperature etc etc
What we really need are rear wheel curves on a dynojet and the DRF files to let consumers compare in the one graph
All cars log air fuels, all cars compared SAE, boost logged and graphed and the other things kept constant I have forgotten about or dont know about







