C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63 vs, CTS-V both being 2009's which is better value?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #26  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by derspi
I feel so bad for the OP who has no idea what he just stepped into - it's an honest question but it baffles me why people ask in the first place. You're bound to get more biased opinions than not (especially so on here).

So where's melmanc when you need him to tell the OP that a tuned C63 can beat a CTS-V? Or the guy who thinks the CTS-V has inferior brakes because they're not drilled OR slotted!!
Yes the Ctsv brakes are inferior. Name a performance car that doesnt have drilled or slotted barkes? Especially a car that has 556hp
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 08:06 PM
  #27  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by Hercules86
jons63 your opinion here is a joke you run your mouth to much and every forum member know it.

i have personally road raced a stock cts-v with only a exhaust modification and will tell you it will blow the doors off a c63 amg at any speed, Start,Roll, 30-120 etc...


if you wanna put your money where your mouth is i have a close friend who has a stock cts-v with only a corsa exhaust as a modification that will run your tuned c63 over, im willing to bet $5000 you cant back your statement up



i love the c63 but sorry guys bottom line the car cannot compare to the cts-v. the V is better looking, has a much better interior and stock vs stock will annhilate a c63. Modded vs Modded the AMG has not one chance in hell.
Mod vs mod I agree. Bringing the C63 to the same crank HP as the CTS V however and the C63 destroys the stock CTS V.

Meaning a tune only C63 will walk a stock CTS V easily. Not sure how much exhaust work only doesnt to the CTS V but I would venture to guess it would close the gap significantly on a tuned C63.

Now on to your other comment of modded vs modded. No question the American car will destroy the C63. Not sure of the fastest CTSV but I know some that are close to mid 9's!!

It a matter how boost however and the C63 is a NA beast. It does way more with way less power than the caddy. To get the CTSV to run a 10.7 like Mike you need to be pushing over 800 crank HP.
Old Mar 10, 2011 | 08:19 PM
  #28  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by propain
Mod vs mod I agree. Bringing the C63 to the same crank HP as the CTS V however and the C63 destroys the stock CTS V.

Meaning a tune only C63 will walk a stock CTS V easily. Not sure how much exhaust work only doesnt to the CTS V but I would venture to guess it would close the gap significantly on a tuned C63.

Now on to your other comment of modded vs modded. No question the American car will destroy the C63. Not sure of the fastest CTSV but I know some that are close to mid 9's!!

It a matter how boost however and the C63 is a NA beast. It does way more with way less power than the caddy. To get the CTSV to run a 10.7 like Mike you need to be pushing over 800 crank HP.
Yes the C63 is a NA beast. Who wouldve thought a 39xx lbs pig would go deep into the 11s@122+ with just 2 boltons?
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 04:17 AM
  #29  
derspi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 235
Likes: 1
From: Lower Mainland, BC
2009 C63
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
Yes the Ctsv brakes are inferior. Name a performance car that doesnt have drilled or slotted barkes? Especially a car that has 556hp
My god that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long while on ANY car forum - this truly shows how little you know and you have NEGATIVE credibility.

Yes, any car without drilled or slotted brakes isn't a performance car at all hence this is why F1 cars have neither.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 05:25 AM
  #30  
VCA_AMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
2018 E63S Wagon
Originally Posted by derspi
My god that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long while on ANY car forum - this truly shows how little you know and you have NEGATIVE credibility.

He's 100% clueless and most members here know it.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #31  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by derspi
My god that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long while on ANY car forum - this truly shows how little you know and you have NEGATIVE credibility.

Yes, any car without drilled or slotted brakes isn't a performance car at all hence this is why F1 cars have neither.
So you couldnt name a high performance car thats in the 60k range that has plain rotors? Except the Ctsv. I guess not.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 06:44 PM
  #32  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by derspi
My god that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long while on ANY car forum - this truly shows how little you know and you have NEGATIVE credibility.

Yes, any car without drilled or slotted brakes isn't a performance car at all hence this is why F1 cars have neither.
Sorry... but I gotta chime in on this...

Name a sports car that doesnt use drilled and or drilled and slotted rotors? Porsche? Ferrari? Mercedes? Nissan? BMW? Lamborghini? Anything....

I really dont know why GM chose to leave them off..


The reason F1 cars don't need to be crossed or drilled though is they have that special cooling drum. I believe F1 breaks are also much smaller than a road car. Never mind that they use specialized carbon fiber discs and pads not found on a street car.

On the other hand, Ive heard of many upgrading the CTSV's rotors for track use. I think the Brembo's are nice though and good enough.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #33  
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
'11 C63 w/ P31
The m3 brakes are drilled but are no good, fade very quickly. The Cts-v is a solid car, brakes are made by Brembo and I would bet they are better than the 60k+ M3.
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:03 PM
  #34  
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
'11 C63 w/ P31
And also a stock 6spd Cts-v sedan ran a 60-130 in 9.3 seconds. My p31 ran a 9.6 and there are a couple tuned c63's that havent been able to get in the 9's. So seems there goes the theory a tuned c63 will walk a Cts-v.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:08 PM
  #35  
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
'11 C63 w/ P31
Edit: I ran 9.79 not 9.6.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #36  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by DD GT3 RD
And also a stock 6spd Cts-v sedan ran a 60-130 in 9.3 seconds. My p31 ran a 9.6 and there are a couple tuned c63's that havent been able to get in the 9's. So seems there goes the theory a tuned c63 will walk a Cts-v.
The ones I ran were autos. So manuals are faster.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:18 PM
  #37  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Not everything happens from 60-130.

I made 2 runs. Lol. With enough practice and the right conditions I can make 9's im sure. Unless your P31 is a freak for some reason. Lol.

Either way. Cant do another one of these ctsv threads
again. Lol.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:27 PM
  #38  
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
'11 C63 w/ P31
I agree I hate "vs" threads but saw some comments.and just wanted to add some facts. Also propain u werent the only one to try. Im sure youll get better times but someone said a tuned c63 is faster than the v. So I was just showing some times. Ive seen 10sec runs from 60-130 in the v too. Just seems completely false to say a tuned c63 will walk a V
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:32 PM
  #39  
gnxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Chicago SW Suburbs
2004 SVT Cobra
Originally Posted by gonzales25
Why is $5000 the amount everyone wants to bet now, what ever happend to a $100 bucks. Man I need a better job
I'm with you.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:33 PM
  #40  
black-clk500's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
'14 911S (garage queen) '13 X3 (family hauler)
Originally Posted by derspi
My god that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long while on ANY car forum - this truly shows how little you know and you have NEGATIVE credibility.
Originally Posted by VCA_AMG
He's 100% clueless and most members here know it.
Ouch
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:34 PM
  #41  
gnxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Chicago SW Suburbs
2004 SVT Cobra
Originally Posted by propain
To get the CTSV to run a 10.7 like Mike you need to be pushing over 800 crank HP.
Absolutely untrue.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:41 PM
  #42  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by gnxs
Absolutely untrue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXbGV5FHqFk

This one has 647 RWHP.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8As1z...CC7837B666B91A

This one is a 700+ crank HP Hennessey.



Other than "Absolutely not true"... now its your turn.. Show me a 10.7 CTSV that isnt putting down more than 700+ Crank HP.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #43  
black-clk500's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
'14 911S (garage queen) '13 X3 (family hauler)
Hahaha--this is classic MBWorld
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #44  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by propain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXbGV5FHqFk

This one has 647 RWHP.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8As1z...CC7837B666B91A

This one is a 700+ crank HP Hennessey.



Other than "Absolutely not true"... now its your turn.. Show me a 10.7 CTSV that isnt putting down more than 700+ Crank HP.
Nice find! But it didnt touch the fastest NA C63 trap speed of 131
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:48 PM
  #45  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by black-clk500
Hahaha--this is classic MBWorld

I know... always sucked into this lamefest... meh!


gnxs has a CTSV... so it was only a matter of time....

I think his best is a 10.8... Gotta be pushing over 700 crank HP to get it too...
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:49 PM
  #46  
gnxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Chicago SW Suburbs
2004 SVT Cobra
Originally Posted by propain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXbGV5FHqFk

This one has 647 RWHP.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8As1z...CC7837B666B91A

This one is a 700+ crank HP Hennessey.



Other than "Absolutely not true"... now its your turn.. Show me a 10.7 CTSV that isnt putting down more than 700+ Crank HP.
I make less than 585 at the wheels (at the crank....who knows but certainly less than 675) and I don't think I need too much more hp to knock .05 off my best ET (10.84).

Hell, a little "Atco air" would likely do the trick.

Last edited by gnxs; Mar 11, 2011 at 09:00 PM.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:53 PM
  #47  
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by propain
I know... always sucked into this lamefest... meh!


gnxs has a CTSV... so it was only a matter of time....

I think his best is a 10.8... Gotta be pushing over 700 crank HP to get it too...
700hp I could imagine if the C63 even had 600hp. Goes to show a ancient push rod 6.2L with tons of boost is limited.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:54 PM
  #48  
propain's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Originally Posted by gnxs
I make less than 585 at the wheels and I don't think I need too much more hp to knock .05 off my best ET (10.84).

Hell, a little "Atco air" would likely do the trick.

690 crank HP... 10.7 you would be over 700 crank HP... I rest my case...


Its cool.. you got one badass caddy.. im a big fan of the CTSV... not looking to get into this... Have a good night..
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #49  
gnxs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Chicago SW Suburbs
2004 SVT Cobra
Originally Posted by propain
690 crank HP... 10.7 you would be over 700 crank HP... I rest my case...
I see I need to requote you again. Not looking to get into it either, just need to make clear again what I responding to:

Originally Posted by propain
To get the CTSV to run a 10.7 like Mike you need to be pushing over 800 crank HP.
That's the quote I said was absolutely untrue.....my statement still stands. BTW, who is Mike? One of the fast East Coast C63 guys? I only know their screen names.



Originally Posted by propain
gnxs has a CTSV... so it was only a matter of time....
I've got real world, direct results. I figured that was relevant.

Last edited by gnxs; Mar 11, 2011 at 09:00 PM.
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:07 PM
  #50  
Nstar's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: W Coast & E Europe
08 E63, 07 RS4, 04 GT3, 10 LR4, 02 Pajero
Originally Posted by propain
Sorry... but I gotta chime in on this...

Name a sports car that doesnt use drilled and or drilled and slotted rotors? Porsche? Ferrari? Mercedes? Nissan? BMW? Lamborghini? Anything....

I really dont know why GM chose to leave them off..
Not really a sports car (though neither is the C63 or CTSV) but the X5M and Cayenne Turbo don't have drilled or drilled and slotted rotors. They bring 5500 lbs to a halt very well.

Like red calipers, manufactures add things that look cool to make sales, they don't always have to be functional.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE