WHAT THE HELL - C63 offers as good milage as my GLK 350
The average fuel consumptions on this car for the last 6 months with close to 40K on it is 11.8 L/per 100KM
So in comparison my C63, give me at best 435KM on a single tank and my average is 12.1L/ per 100KM
So the GLK 350 is nearly half the engine size as the C63 with two less cylinders and I get nearly the same milage and fuel economy - utter rubbish!

I am selling the GLK and getting the diesel variant
What do you think about this!
Last edited by 1Lop2K5C; Mar 10, 2011 at 01:58 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Certain mods lend themselves better to helping MPG, others hurt. Finding out the right combination to maximize fuel efficiency is the key to getting better gas mileage through modding. Avoid any fuel mods if you want to keep MPGs high. The second you do injectors gas mileage falls through the floor.
So how many miles will you drive (and fuel money saved) before you make up for the depreciation money lost trading in the GLK350 for the desmell
Looked at everything else and the new x3 is a completely different animal from the last one.
Much smoother ride beautiful tech goodies and great fit and finish.
Plus, we're getting an ordered car in less than a month since they're made in the US.
Check out the new X3, it's bigger, better looking, better finishes and better gas mileage than the GLK--and drives like a BMW

And I wanted to get away from BMW, but they pulled me back in
I used to get 8MPG in my Escalade so the C63 is a real step up for me in regards to fuel consumption........When driving normal!!
The average fuel consumptions on this car for the last 6 months with close to 40K on it is 11.8 L/per 100KM
So in comparison my C63, give me at best 435KM on a single tank and my average is 12.1L/ per 100KM
So the GLK 350 is nearly half the engine size as the C63 with two less cylinders and I get nearly the same milage and fuel economy - utter rubbish!

I am selling the GLK and getting the diesel variant
What do you think about this!
You just need to drive the car smoothly and perhaps use cruise control on non-stop long trips, also I am talking about mid 70 mph average.
Last edited by C63newdude; Mar 12, 2011 at 10:22 PM.
2010 GLK 350 51,000 miles 2 years = 19.7 mpg from start
Granted the C63 is driven differently with multiple track days at less than 5 mpg but my mileage on the GLK is better than I expected going in.





:b sflag:
That is absolutely bull****. I get somewhere between 230 and 250miles in city on C mode under miserable conditions like altitude and 91 oct gas. That alone is close to 400 kilometers but I have done trips login well over 500 kilometers.
You probably drive heavy on the gas pedal because I a telling you that I get much better gas mileage than that and I am on 91 oct and altitude.
Why would i lie about getting bad fuel economy





:b sflag:
That is absolutely bull****. I get somewhere between 230 and 250miles in city on C mode under miserable conditions like altitude and 91 oct gas. That alone is close to 400 kilometers but I have done trips login well over 500 kilometers.
You probably drive heavy on the gas pedal because I a telling you that I get much better gas mileage than that and I am on 91 oct and altitude.
That is the reason why I chose the Q over the GLK when I purchased it. I do not understand why the GLK gets so poog gas mileage.
Sorry, I didn't mean to make it sound as a personal attack or anything. I am just pointing out that you should get better than that, at least I do, I get far better than 320km.
Are you driving on S mode all the time?, I drive on C mode all the time and light on the gas most of the times as well.











