Baseline dyno for my 2011 is in!
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Baseline dyno for my 2011 is in!
Overall, I'm very pleased with the results. Based on other comparable dynojet numbers I've seen, I think I got a very healthy car with lots of potential. Can't wait to see where the Stage 2 setup puts me!
Dyno: Dynojet 224xLC
Shop: SpecialtyZ in Chatsworth, CA
Fuel: Chevron 91 octane
Mods: AFE Dry Filters, Charcoal Deletes
Peak #'s: 385whp/375wtq (see attached graphs)
Pulls done in 4th gear
Let me know what you guys think.
Thanks!
Dyno: Dynojet 224xLC
Shop: SpecialtyZ in Chatsworth, CA
Fuel: Chevron 91 octane
Mods: AFE Dry Filters, Charcoal Deletes
Peak #'s: 385whp/375wtq (see attached graphs)
Pulls done in 4th gear
Let me know what you guys think.
Thanks!
Last edited by xtyper; 10-21-2011 at 08:07 PM.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Thanks Keith. Nope, no performance package, yet about 15whp higher than my 2010 did with the same mods, same dyno, same conditions. Now I'm even more excited to get the MHP headers on!
Last edited by xtyper; 10-21-2011 at 04:06 PM.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#7
Super Member
According to this http://www.youtube.com/user/sonnymad#p/u/73/lobma86OZT0 a 2010 makes more power than a 2008 model. I wonder if a 2011 is even more powerful
Trending Topics
#10
Great looking graphs.
How many pulls did you do? Did your numbers increase as you did more pulls?
I'm not trying to be rude here, just stating my opinion: I think the numbers are on the high side. When you do the math, 385 whp on 91 octane represents slightly less than 15% drivetrain loss, which doesn't seem realistic for our automatic trans.
Also, I would bet that if you dynoed your car stock with 93 octane on that same dyno with similar conditions, you would have even higher numbers than 385. Reason being, our cars are meant to run on 93 octane and the car doesn't advance full timing for 91 octane gas. If you ever put in higher octane, you can feel the difference.
So, if your car made more than 385 whp with 93 octane, that would account for even less drivetrain loss than your car is displaying now.
Having said all of that, this dyno will obviously give you accurate results between this baseline and post LT's runs.
How many pulls did you do? Did your numbers increase as you did more pulls?
I'm not trying to be rude here, just stating my opinion: I think the numbers are on the high side. When you do the math, 385 whp on 91 octane represents slightly less than 15% drivetrain loss, which doesn't seem realistic for our automatic trans.
Also, I would bet that if you dynoed your car stock with 93 octane on that same dyno with similar conditions, you would have even higher numbers than 385. Reason being, our cars are meant to run on 93 octane and the car doesn't advance full timing for 91 octane gas. If you ever put in higher octane, you can feel the difference.
So, if your car made more than 385 whp with 93 octane, that would account for even less drivetrain loss than your car is displaying now.
Having said all of that, this dyno will obviously give you accurate results between this baseline and post LT's runs.
#12
@xtyper,
I just want to reiterate that I was not trying to be rude. Definitely was not trying to rain on your parade. And, I really hope it didn't come across that way. I'm certainly excited for your upcoming mods.
I just want to reiterate that I was not trying to be rude. Definitely was not trying to rain on your parade. And, I really hope it didn't come across that way. I'm certainly excited for your upcoming mods.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Guess we will see next weekend at Famoso if the track runs jive with the higher than usual dyne results.