MHP LT headers + Mids + Race Exhaust For Sale
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
that's correct. dyno was done on a mustang dyno at autoscope in dallas tx. it was immediately after the header was installed. i believe at the time it was eurocharged v2 tune. october of 2010
then in july 2011, i did another dyno at the same shop before getting a v3+ eurochaged retune. before numbers were 437/403. changes were ROW airboxes and bmc filter instead of k&n
then the dyno after the v3+ retune came out to be 471/438. this is with no break in time but i'm not sure how much that would make a difference.
anyways, good luck with sale. i just wanted to share some info.
then in july 2011, i did another dyno at the same shop before getting a v3+ eurochaged retune. before numbers were 437/403. changes were ROW airboxes and bmc filter instead of k&n
then the dyno after the v3+ retune came out to be 471/438. this is with no break in time but i'm not sure how much that would make a difference.
anyways, good luck with sale. i just wanted to share some info.
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Thats the whole point. we never had a real test between the two
supposedly if you had the same matching tunes with the two diffrent C63 headers, then we can all know which is the best set-up.
Personally, I strongly believ the try-yi from MBH is more powerful.
everybody is entitled to thier opinion
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Thats the whole point. we never had a real test between the two
supposedly if you had the same matching tunes with the two diffrent C63 headers, then we can all know which is the best set-up.
Personally, I strongly believ the try-yi from MBH is more powerful.
everybody is entitled to thier opinion
supposedly if you had the same matching tunes with the two diffrent C63 headers, then we can all know which is the best set-up.
Personally, I strongly believ the try-yi from MBH is more powerful.
everybody is entitled to thier opinion
I agree as long as its stated as opinion and not fact. Your opinion seemed to be quite conclusive based on elements that have no parity.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 6
360 Modena TT
maybe someone can chime in and tell me i'm wrong
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Personally I believe he would have made better track results.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Fair enough. But I don't like claims that MHP headers are better than MBH. All the track results from the 1/4 mile achieved by MHP customers were achieved by running more aggressive tunes designed for 1/4 mile drag. Explain to me how petroC63 got a best of 11.24s after a revised tune + a custom tune. Couldn't he have done the same while he was still running the MBH headers?
Personally I believe he would have made better track results.
Personally I believe he would have made better track results.
From my memory he ran MBH headers with a revised tune and his best time was 11.4
Then later he switched to the MHP headers at got the 11.2 on the same tune. I might be mistaken though.
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
now it does with the v3 , which i would not think is considered a "moderate canned tune" . a moderate canned tune would be Kleeman or anything v1 or maybe v2 . anything v3 would be more aggresive than a moderate tune . your brother claimed he hadn't seen lower than 461 and i should him that there was lower with a moderate tune .
maybe someone can chime in and tell me i'm wrong
maybe someone can chime in and tell me i'm wrong
In the end with a dyno jet he made 471rwhp. Now let me ask you a question since you are running the MHP headers. Can you show us your dynosheets if you have ever conducted when your C63 was NA?
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
I believe that is not correct. His 11.4 was with his previous MHP v3 (techtec) tune. He then switched headers and recieved the revised matched header tune and made 11.29. After the custom tune, he made 11.24 (best)
keep in mind the previous tune that he had with MHP was not a match for his MBH
.I like Petro'c C63 it is an absolute monster
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
i'll save you the trouble and chim in. The 431whp was done on a mustang dyno as the owner stated, which is a very low reading dyno.
In the end with a dyno jet he made 471rwhp. Now let me ask you a question since you are running the MHP headers. Can you show us your dynosheets if you have ever conducted when your C63 was NA?
In the end with a dyno jet he made 471rwhp. Now let me ask you a question since you are running the MHP headers. Can you show us your dynosheets if you have ever conducted when your C63 was NA?
So many variables though to consider. My tune only C63 made 447whp on a dynojet.
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
thats because you have Jeremey's tune (OE). which i believe is better than MHP and you proved it on the track.
Jeremy ran 11.1 @ MIR runing with a diffrent try-yi headers (gintani), runing @ full weight. (talk about same track & condition), oh and it wasnt a race tune :-)
When is the last time a C63 ran 11.1 with Header+tune runing full weight?
Jeremy has a customer in Qatar running with his mods. Trust me, no AMG messes with him
Imagine someone runing the MBH headers with an OE matched tune and runing @ MIR. Now that is something we all would like to see :-)
Last edited by SLS Qatar; May 22, 2012 at 04:22 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
thats because you have Jeremey's tune (OE). which i believe is better than MHP and you proved it on the track.
Jeremy ran 11.1 @ MIR runing with a diffrent try-yi headers (gintani), runing @ full weight. (talk about same track & condition), oh and it wasnt a race tune :-)
When is the last time a C63 ran 11.1 with Header+tune runing full weight?
Jeremy has a customer in Qatar running with his mods. Trust me, no AMG messes with him
Imagine someone runing the MBH headers with an OE matched tune and runing @ MIR. Now that is something we all would like to see :-)
Jeremy ran 11.1 @ MIR runing with a diffrent try-yi headers (gintani), runing @ full weight. (talk about same track & condition), oh and it wasnt a race tune :-)
When is the last time a C63 ran 11.1 with Header+tune runing full weight?
Jeremy has a customer in Qatar running with his mods. Trust me, no AMG messes with him
Imagine someone runing the MBH headers with an OE matched tune and runing @ MIR. Now that is something we all would like to see :-)
The conditions must be consistent though. Same DA and track.
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
I believe Hagi runs MHP headers with an OE tune at full weight. Except for the hood and trunk and he is almost running a 10.99. A good test would be to switch to MBH headers for him and see if he picks up anything.
The conditions must be consistent though. Same DA and track.
The conditions must be consistent though. Same DA and track.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 6
360 Modena TT
i'll save you the trouble and chim in. The 431whp was done on a mustang dyno as the owner stated, which is a very low reading dyno.
In the end with a dyno jet he made 471rwhp. Now let me ask you a question since you are running the MHP headers. Can you show us your dynosheets if you have ever conducted when your C63 was NA?
In the end with a dyno jet he made 471rwhp. Now let me ask you a question since you are running the MHP headers. Can you show us your dynosheets if you have ever conducted when your C63 was NA?
i know there's a video of me running a 474whp m3 from 50mph and he pulled me by about a car or 2 . he also got the jump on me , which you can hear in the video .
here's the video of me and the m3
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
i can't remember if i posted them on here or not but i did explain the situation . i have only had 1 dyno run and it was for a commercial for a speed shop here in El Paso . it was a half *** run just for the commercial with 1 small little fan in 90 degree weather . it only did 458/423 and i never went back for another run . me personally , i couldn't care less what my dyno run showed cuz i knew it had plenty more in it .
i know there's a video of me running a 474whp m3 from 50mph and he pulled me by about a car or 2 . he also got the jump on me , which you can hear in the video .
here's the video of me and the m3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxM2iwDDcJs
i know there's a video of me running a 474whp m3 from 50mph and he pulled me by about a car or 2 . he also got the jump on me , which you can hear in the video .
here's the video of me and the m3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxM2iwDDcJs
an M3 beating you. I am actually shocked that this M3 has beaten you
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 6
360 Modena TT
this was with the old MHP (Techtec) tune and before the headers were on . this M3 did 474whp and i know cuz he is a good friend of mine that moved to Dallas . his car has the VF supercharger and other bolt-ons . i never got to run him with the headers cuz he moved .
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
ok my bad, that explains it . Because that M3 seemed to have beaten your C63 pretty bad .
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 6
360 Modena TT
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Its all pretty close in the end. As long as you have an aggressive tuner and a header you will see results that are pretty close to one aother.
In the end and back to parity instead of points of parity which are very hard to come by you go with differentiation. Choose a company that you feel will work best for you and that is different than all the rest for whatever reasons you like.
One of the tests I would like to do is getting a tune only C63 with a race file on it and shave some weight and see how close I can get it to the full exhaust builds of others. I bet it would be pretty close.
In the end and back to parity instead of points of parity which are very hard to come by you go with differentiation. Choose a company that you feel will work best for you and that is different than all the rest for whatever reasons you like.
One of the tests I would like to do is getting a tune only C63 with a race file on it and shave some weight and see how close I can get it to the full exhaust builds of others. I bet it would be pretty close.
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Its all pretty close in the end. As long as you have an aggressive tuner and a header you will see results that are pretty close to one aother.
In the end and back to parity instead of points of parity which are very hard to come by you go with differentiation. Choose a company that you feel will work best for you and that is different than all the rest for whatever reasons you like.
One of the tests I would like to do is getting a tune only C63 with a race file on it and shave some weight and see how close I can get it to the full exhaust builds of others. I bet it would be pretty close.
In the end and back to parity instead of points of parity which are very hard to come by you go with differentiation. Choose a company that you feel will work best for you and that is different than all the rest for whatever reasons you like.
One of the tests I would like to do is getting a tune only C63 with a race file on it and shave some weight and see how close I can get it to the full exhaust builds of others. I bet it would be pretty close.
I finally agree with what you said
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Doha, Qatar
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
