C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

OETuning + PowerPipe + AFE Filter + Charcoal Delete

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:49 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jason Anthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 C63 AMG Coupe
OETuning + PowerPipe + AFE Filter + Charcoal Delete

2013 C63 Coupe P31 with PowerPipe, AFE Dry Filter, Charcoal Delete

Here's a dyno measured at RWHP - car runs very smooth - accelerates beautifully with no hesitation or jerkiness.

Old 02-04-2013, 02:22 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Aresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: LONG ISLAND , NY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
How much power did you gain? Looks like the power pipe actually adds power


Posted from Mbworld.org App for Android
Old 02-04-2013, 07:47 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
kenster96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 C63
Hey I was thinking about buying some afe filters, but how do you like them? Also do you know if the charcoal deletes would let me pass my smog checks? (Live in california)
Old 02-05-2013, 03:57 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
flipdsm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Socal
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63
Dyno with OE tune?
Old 02-05-2013, 11:04 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
ML63 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 963
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
CL63 AMG
Those rpms are way off, the numbers are not accurate. The difference gain is though. Auto wave does that all the time, dunno why it's so hard for them to just line up the redline numbers ... Basic dyno 101 stuff
Old 02-05-2013, 12:42 PM
  #6  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by ML63 AMG
Those rpms are way off, the numbers are not accurate. The difference gain is though. Auto wave does that all the time, dunno why it's so hard for them to just line up the redline numbers ... Basic dyno 101 stuff
Good catch--- the rpms are too high...
Old 02-05-2013, 12:42 PM
  #7  
Member
 
htoudiee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M3, S4, C63
Can you explain which graph is for what configuration?
Old 02-12-2013, 08:42 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
SaintC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Jason Anthony
2013 C63 Coupe P31 with PowerPipe, AFE Dry Filter, Charcoal Delete

Here's a dyno measured at RWHP - car runs very smooth - accelerates beautifully with no hesitation or jerkiness.



You'd think with the PP that you should have at least the standard C63 HP of 451, right?
Old 02-12-2013, 08:46 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Higgs Boson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 225
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
2020 AMG GTR
Originally Posted by SaintC63
You'd think with the PP that you should have at least the standard C63 HP of 451, right?
factory rates hp at the engine. this is a chassis dyno which rates hp at the wheels after all drivetrain losses. it can vary wildly from dyno to dyno and across the country at different altitudes and weather conditions. a chassis dyno isn't necessarily that great to compare hp levels especially under such different circumstances but they are great tools for tuning in one spot, like a treadmill for cars....

that's not to say there isn't a difference between a 200 and 500 hp car but to pick nits over 20 hp or so can be futile.

Last edited by Higgs Boson; 02-12-2013 at 08:48 PM.
Old 02-12-2013, 08:50 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
SaintC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Higgs Boson
factory rates hp at the engine. this is a chassis dyno which rates hp at the wheels after all drivetrain losses. it can vary wildly from dyno to dyno and across the country at different altitudes and weather conditions. a chassis dyno isn't necessarily that great to compare hp levels especially under such different circumstances but they are great tools for tuning in one spot, like a treadmill for cars....

that's not to say there isn't a difference between a 200 and 500 hp car but to pick nits over 20 hp or so can be futile.
Thanks for the clarification.

I am just concerned since the Car, on paper, boasts 481 with the P31. I get it could be altitude, or heat but a drop of 65 HP even with all the add ons? To me something doesn't add up, but again, I am not a seasoned tuner nor modifier.
Old 02-12-2013, 10:13 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
_timothy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by SaintC63
Thanks for the clarification.

I am just concerned since the Car, on paper, boasts 481 with the P31. I get it could be altitude, or heat but a drop of 65 HP even with all the add ons? To me something doesn't add up, but again, I am not a seasoned tuner nor modifier.
he just told you how it adds up. its not rated at the wheels but at the crank/engine/whatever.
Old 02-12-2013, 10:22 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Higgs Boson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 225
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
2020 AMG GTR
Originally Posted by SaintC63
Thanks for the clarification.

I am just concerned since the Car, on paper, boasts 481 with the P31. I get it could be altitude, or heat but a drop of 65 HP even with all the add ons? To me something doesn't add up, but again, I am not a seasoned tuner nor modifier.
a traditional manual transmission car can take 10-12% to put the power down to the road.

a traditional automatic can be 18-20% and awd can be 20-25%.

if the 7 speed mct car takes 13-15% to get 480 hp to the road then you have 415 hp left by the time it is at the wheels. friction, heat, slippage, etc all contribute to drivetrain losses.
Old 02-12-2013, 10:50 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
C-63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG
I am hella confused right now.

Shouldn't a 481 HP with an OE Tune, AFE filters and powerpipe be putting down way more than 417 at the wheels? Give or take 15 HP here or there, shouldn't that 417 kind of be standard?
Old 02-12-2013, 10:56 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
To give you an idea of drivetrain loss from the crank figures MB advertises, my 2008 C63 put out 247kw at*the wheels compared to 336kw advertisied at the engine. This figure was on a 50degree day though.
Old 02-12-2013, 10:58 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Add some kw because of the hot day that's still a 23-25% drivetrain loss.
Old 02-12-2013, 11:00 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
SaintC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by C-63AMG
I am hella confused right now.

Shouldn't a 481 HP with an OE Tune, AFE filters and powerpipe be putting down way more than 417 at the wheels? Give or take 15 HP here or there, shouldn't that 417 kind of be standard?
I'm with you on that one.

The seasoned guys in this forum, as a Newbie, can someone explain and insert footnotes to where accurate information is that helps explain HP loss from the advertised auto, whether it be due to temp, altitude or it being taken at the wheels or crankshaft.

I am not looking to discredit this particular thread, I am genuinely interested in understanding how something like this thread happens.

Thanks
Old 02-12-2013, 11:06 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
This really isn't that complicated. For the 7G auto and I believe the MCT is about the same, driveline loss is about 18%. So with 451 rated HP at the crank, that translates to about 370 HP at the wheels. So most tunes and P31 package get the M156 up to, at least on most dynojets, to about 420 HP at the wheels, so, 512 HP at the crank.

Crank HP*0.82=wheel HP
Old 02-12-2013, 11:12 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
C-63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Even Money
This really isn't that complicated. For the 7G auto and I believe the MCT is about the same, driveline loss is about 18%. So with 451 rated HP at the crank, that translates to about 370 HP at the wheels. So most tunes and P31 package get the M156 up to, at least on most dynojets, to about 420 HP at the wheels, so, 512 HP at the crank.

Crank HP*0.82=wheel HP
Hey bud, don't all these tuning companies claim / and dyno the stock 451 (non p31) to 510 hp at the crank? This is a P31. Can you kindly explain please. Not sure about all this but would like to find out. Thanks
Old 02-12-2013, 11:38 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Originally Posted by C-63AMG
Hey bud, don't all these tuning companies claim / and dyno the stock 451 (non p31) to 510 hp at the crank? This is a P31. Can you kindly explain please. Not sure about all this but would like to find out. Thanks
I think I know what you're trying to say. After tune, non P31, should be about 510 at the crank, as I posted above.

The P31, and this is covered in several older threads that can be found with a google search, is basically a factory offered tune. MB rates it at 481 at the crank, but most will tell you, and I've seen one on the dyno, that is underrated, should be more like 500-510. The dyno runs I witnessed on a dynojet were all in the 420s.

The dyno graph in this thread is from a dyno dynamics, so that 417 whp might be something completely different on a dynojet, I would guess a little higher. From what I've seen dynojets tend to give numbers that you would expect, whereas a mustang dyno will read much less, for whatever reason.

Dynos are really only good for evaluating mods/tuning, that is, how much hp did you make? You should use the same dyno, similar conditions and setup, except obviously for what you modified on the car.

Comparing different dynos with similar mods is pointless. So, back to the beginning, I don't know if 417 whp for the mods listed is good on a dyno dynamics. You would need to know what that car pulled stock on the same dyno, and the delta would give you the answer.

Looking at the graph again, and assuming that the lower curve is the stock pull, then about 25 whp gain for the P31, seems about right.

Last edited by Even Money; 02-12-2013 at 11:42 PM. Reason: 2nd look at graph
Old 02-12-2013, 11:55 PM
  #20  
Super Member
 
C-63AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG
Thanks Even Money,

So if the P31 is basically a factory tune, why can't we simply do this P31 tune on our car and then follow it through with an aftermarket tune which OE / Eurocharge etc do for the P31? So this is like doing two tunes which is basically what you've said the P31 is?

Won't that get more HP?

Or are these companies doing tunes on the P31 not really doing tunes?

I would imagine the P31 with a OE tune will have more HP crank/wheels, than a 451hp C63 with an OE tune?


Originally Posted by Even Money
I think I know what you're trying to say. After tune, non P31, should be about 510 at the crank, as I posted above.

The P31, and this is covered in several older threads that can be found with a google search, is basically a factory offered tune. MB rates it at 481 at the crank, but most will tell you, and I've seen one on the dyno, that is underrated, should be more like 500-510. The dyno runs I witnessed on a dynojet were all in the 420s.

The dyno graph in this thread is from a dyno dynamics, so that 417 whp might be something completely different on a dynojet, I would guess a little higher. From what I've seen dynojets tend to give numbers that you would expect, whereas a mustang dyno will read much less, for whatever reason.

Dynos are really only good for evaluating mods/tuning, that is, how much hp did you make? You should use the same dyno, similar conditions and setup, except obviously for what you modified on the car.

Comparing different dynos with similar mods is pointless. So, back to the beginning, I don't know if 417 whp for the mods listed is good on a dyno dynamics. You would need to know what that car pulled stock on the same dyno, and the delta would give you the answer.

Looking at the graph again, and assuming that the lower curve is the stock pull, then about 25 whp gain for the P31, seems about right.
Old 02-13-2013, 12:13 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Even Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 VW GTI
Originally Posted by C-63AMG
Thanks Even Money,

So if the P31 is basically a factory tune, why can't we simply do this P31 tune on our car and then follow it through with an aftermarket tune which OE / Eurocharge etc do for the P31? So this is like doing two tunes which is basically what you've said the P31 is?

Won't that get more HP?

Or are these companies doing tunes on the P31 not really doing tunes?

I would imagine the P31 with a OE tune will have more HP crank/wheels, than a 451hp C63 with an OE tune?
You can tune any M156 and should only need to do so once or again as you change hardware mods. The P31 simply has a higher starting point, so much less room to improve. Once you adjust the fuel/air, timing, throttle opening, etc., all M156 motors should have about the same output, basically.
Differences arise between the AMG models due to different engine internals(might free up a few extra HP, such as the P31), larger factory exhaust, E class is larger than C class, or intake design and factory exhaust and maybe a few other things, SLS.


You can't get the P31 tune from MB, unless you own a P31 car. You can't simply have them flash a P31 tune onto your ECU as it won't match the VIN.
Old 02-13-2013, 12:15 AM
  #22  
Super Member
 
johnnyblaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 752
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
CLS63S
Originally Posted by C-63AMG
Thanks Even Money,

So if the P31 is basically a factory tune, why can't we simply do this P31 tune on our car and then follow it through with an aftermarket tune which OE / Eurocharge etc do for the P31? So this is like doing two tunes which is basically what you've said the P31 is?

Won't that get more HP?

Or are these companies doing tunes on the P31 not really doing tunes?

I would imagine the P31 with a OE tune will have more HP crank/wheels, than a 451hp C63 with an OE tune?
P31 is really just a moderate tune on a stock C63. Sure you have lighter stronger internals, better brakes, sit a tad lower, and have a flashy cf interior. But its still the same Car. Tune to tune its the same thing.


video proof

umad?
Old 02-13-2013, 12:55 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
LosalPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW m5 2013
Originally Posted by Jason Anthony
2013 C63 Coupe P31 with PowerPipe, AFE Dry Filter, Charcoal Delete

Here's a dyno measured at RWHP - car runs very smooth - accelerates beautifully with no hesitation or jerkiness.

I was leaving school and I went by... that Burrito burger place by Fullerton College and I saw a car with the same specs as yours. Wasn't you by chance was it? 0_0 If it helps I was the stupid kid who zoomed past you on the other side of the street in a 135is lol
Old 02-15-2013, 02:59 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
InTheBenz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North/Central NJ
Posts: 1,305
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
GLC 63 S AMG / Corvette C8 / Jaguar SVR
Do you like the AFE dry filters? Saw someone else ask, but no answer.
Old 02-15-2013, 04:15 PM
  #25  
b16
Super Member
 
b16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63, 2000 ML 430, 1994 Del Sol Vtec
Regarding Dyno tuning, don't look at the actual WHP/WTQ numbers. You want to look at the difference between the two curves. The Dyno is just a tool. Don't take the numbers of any Dyno at face value as they vary greatly.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: OETuning + PowerPipe + AFE Filter + Charcoal Delete



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.