C 63 BS with LTH Dyno
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 G55, 2012 C63 BS
C 63 BS with LTH Dyno
My C63BS got install LTH with Xpipes from MBH with cats delete.
I also have ROW air boxes with Weistec filters and Weistec tune.
just got dyno 511hp.
I also have ROW air boxes with Weistec filters and Weistec tune.
just got dyno 511hp.
#3
Video please
Nice numbers g55 now it's complete
Nice numbers g55 now it's complete
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 G55, 2012 C63 BS
Trending Topics
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 C63 AMG Black Series
Wow those numbers are great. I had MBH LTH, mid-pipes, catless x-pipes, ROW airbox, K&N airfilters, and Weistec tune put on my BS last week. Can't wait to get mine on the dyno. Awesome numbers!!
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 G55, 2012 C63 BS
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
'14 C63 "Edition 507"; '02 Widebody WS6 Trans Am ~ 1,200hp (kills everything)
Any reason your tuner doesn't let it spin up another 500-600 RPMs? Your power curve is plainly on the up and up when it's cut off at 6800. I'd say there's another 20hp left in it if you allow it to spin up a little higher.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 G55, 2012 C63 BS
i agree, it is an old mustang dyno with a speed limiter.
#14
Does that say engine power and engine torque on the dyno sheet?
MDs are interesting dynos. MD found they were losing a lot of business to DJ because DJs read higher and customers liked that So you can now with newer MDs calibrate them to read as high or higher than DJs. Not saying thats the case here because clearly this dyno reads like a MD should (lower) than a DJ.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
'14 C63 "Edition 507"; '02 Widebody WS6 Trans Am ~ 1,200hp (kills everything)
Does that say engine power and engine torque on the dyno sheet?
MDs are interesting dynos. MD found they were losing a lot of business to DJ because DJs read higher and customers liked that So you can now with newer MDs calibrate them to read as high or higher than DJs. Not saying thats the case here because clearly this dyno reads like a MD should (lower) than a DJ.
MDs are interesting dynos. MD found they were losing a lot of business to DJ because DJs read higher and customers liked that So you can now with newer MDs calibrate them to read as high or higher than DJs. Not saying thats the case here because clearly this dyno reads like a MD should (lower) than a DJ.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal, Orlando/Miami FL USA, Japan
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 C63 AMG BS, 2010 DUCATI 1198S
Very nice numbers. I'm now even more excited to see what mine will put down. We have almost an identical list of mods, except mine will have high flow cats, and a different tuner.
#18
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Not being a hater, just making some observations. Also don't want others like NellyRod to be disappointed or think something is wrong if they run their similarly modded cars on a more average dyno and "only" see 470-480whp. Congrats nonetheless.
Last edited by xtyper; 07-11-2013 at 06:58 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 G55, 2012 C63 BS
Why does the stock graph (w/ 2nd cat delete) cut off at about 5900rpm? Seems to me that if that line had continued the same way the post LTH/tune did, the 435whp would have been more like 465-470whp. That would lead me to believe the dyno reads very high, as we all know that stock BS are well below that. Clearly the delta is there and the LTH/tune combo yielded gains, but I don't think it's really putting down 511whp on your standard dynojet.
Not being a hater, just making some observations. Also don't want others like NellyRod to be disappointed or think something is wrong if they run their similarly modded cars on a more average dyno and "only" see 470-480whp. Congrats nonetheless.
Not being a hater, just making some observations. Also don't want others like NellyRod to be disappointed or think something is wrong if they run their similarly modded cars on a more average dyno and "only" see 470-480whp. Congrats nonetheless.
Also I know that NellyRod had his C63BS dyno more than once and he got same results around 430whp
Last edited by G55AMG; 07-11-2013 at 08:44 PM.
#21
#23
#25
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal, Orlando/Miami FL USA, Japan
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 C63 AMG BS, 2010 DUCATI 1198S
That is correct. I had 3 runs on 3 separate DynoJets and put down 428-432 WHP each time. To be honest, I'd be happy to put down 480ish WHP. I think a 50 WHP gain from headers and a tune is pretty decent on a car that already comes strong from the factory. Especially considering the fact that I will be running 200 cell cats. I will do a before an after dyno next week Friday when I have everything installed.
Last edited by NellyRod; 07-11-2013 at 09:55 PM.