C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

CTS-V vs Weistec Stage 3 Vs Longtube header/tune C63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-27-2014, 07:28 PM
  #51  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Insomniac
I just got to my car. Will you mf'rs leave me alone!?! Salt in the wounds!?!

Haha.


Lol, that is funny.

Look at what petro has done, stage 2 mods, hes flying.

Stage 2 Mods:
- American Racing Headers w/X-pipe
- 9.1 Lower Pulley
- Tune Time Custom Cam
- Moroso Dual Catch Cans
- Zl1 Lid
- Norcal Tank
- Tune by Tune Time Performance

That isnt much for mods to get where he is at.

Last edited by Merc63; 05-27-2014 at 07:30 PM.
Old 05-27-2014, 07:40 PM
  #52  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PetroC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 CTS-V
Having switched from a C63 to a V I can tell you the V is much easier and cheaper to modify. Better bang for your buck.

Just look at my sig.
Old 05-27-2014, 07:46 PM
  #53  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by shchow
Mod vs mod the V will walk the C for peanuts.
There are plenty of Vs in the 9s.
I don't think there are any Cs in the 9s...
Its not a C, but its the same engine and tranny. Everything can be applied to a C class if someone wanted to.

I am pretty sure that is faster then the fastest V??


Clearly it will be cheaper and easy to mod a car with a blower already on it and a single cam, compared to a 4 cam NA car.

Old 05-27-2014, 07:51 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
dubzAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
2010 C63 AMG FBO, 2014 E63 AMG S
Originally Posted by Insomniac
Hey have you two C63 guys dynoed your cars?
Mine dynoed 400 whp stock, haven't had a chance to go back after the mods yet.
Old 05-27-2014, 08:45 PM
  #55  
Newbie
 
Insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V
I think there are only a few Vs in the 9s, and even fewer off the bottle.
Old 05-27-2014, 08:58 PM
  #56  
Super Member
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
Originally Posted by Insomniac
I think there are only a few Vs in the 9s, and even fewer off the bottle.
Not sure, but both are small potatoes compared to the 3000+ HP Bentley. Ya'll are slackers. Get with the game.
Old 05-27-2014, 11:01 PM
  #57  
Member
 
Overrated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Twin Turbo
Originally Posted by PetroC63
Having switched from a C63 to a V I can tell you the V is much easier and cheaper to modify. Better bang for your buck.

Just look at my sig.
Nice V. Is it manual or auto.

A friend of mine has a 2011 and it's really quick.
Old 05-28-2014, 05:47 PM
  #58  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sincity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vegas and Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,975
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
.
Man, your car is moving. I'd like to see the Caddy come back with a few more mods and see how much closer he will be.
Old 05-28-2014, 10:25 PM
  #59  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,122
Received 300 Likes on 193 Posts
10 C six trizzle
i have a few comments to address here.
Yes the V will be cheaper to mod, it's based off a lsX motor which has been out since 1997. lots of time for r&d not to mention cheap parts that camaro owners can afford. It will always be a gm product though. I love the V on paper, even considered getting a V wagon - they look amazing. Finally drove a V will never think about that again.

335's lots of power potential - but comparing a highly modd'd engine to a relatively stock one is never fair. take the meth injection off - thats like running on race gas practically. not to mention if one of those nozzles fail the motor pops from high intake air temps or from hydro-lock. If you want to argue that route - a turbo supra or a gtr is way better car. bottom line is any of these cars will never make low end torque that a big v8 has and will always have turbo lag.

C-63 motors are limited on mods. Yea thats what happens when things are designed properly. No options for camshafts - because they are already so versatile and badass. headers/exhaust tune. then all you have is a blower? Well thats usually the car for poorly designed engines minus getting cylinder heads replaced with better castings and a camshaft. AMG saved you the 5k$ for that one. Didnt sacrifice drivability and poor idling for it either. Atleast with stage 2 blower kit injectors and fuel pumps arent need either. Most fast cars have a turbo, blower or nitrous and non are running the factor equipped version if they came with one.

One mod people over look is the sls intake manifold but it's not cheap and wont fit without modifiction but theres alot of top end boost.
Old 05-29-2014, 10:40 AM
  #60  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PetroC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 CTS-V
Originally Posted by Overrated
Nice V. Is it manual or auto.

A friend of mine has a 2011 and it's really quick.
Auto.

Auto's are faster in the 1/4 mile versus the manual. I think the fastest manual V has run 10.8 and the fastest auto ran a 9.4


And for those that think GM makes crap you are sadly mistaken because my V is much better than my C63 ever was in just about every regard. Handling, acceleration, ride comfort, road noise, interior(subjective) but my C63 was a 2010 so it was prior to the slight interior update in 2012. What I liked most about the C63 was the steering wheel and the exhaust tone.


Here is my cammed V. Does it sound like idles poorly? If a car is properly tuned it will idle and drive like stock. Mine does.



And you can barely here that on the inside. Like a Caddy should be.

Last edited by PetroC63; 05-29-2014 at 04:46 PM.
Old 05-29-2014, 11:42 AM
  #61  
Banned
 
avery.whss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
S550 on order
Pretty sure a CTS-V is caddys most expensive product though...Lol..this is like comparing a C63 to a GTR basically..C63 is mercedes entry level pretty much and it is still comparable to caddys highest level ....Hell the CTS-V comes stock with a blower..it should be smoking a C63 with a tune and headers. Although the caddy is quite a bit cheaper then a C63..their platforms also been out for 10x longert

that CTS-V does sound sick though petro

Last edited by avery.whss; 05-29-2014 at 12:42 PM.
Old 05-29-2014, 12:23 PM
  #62  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Sounds great petro, love the hint of a loopy idle.

I looked at getting into a ctsv but I just like the feel of the c63 better and not cause it's a Benz I could care less about that crap.
Old 05-29-2014, 04:46 PM
  #63  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PetroC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 CTS-V
Originally Posted by avery.whss
Pretty sure a CTS-V is caddys most expensive product though...Lol..this is like comparing a C63 to a GTR basically..C63 is mercedes entry level pretty much and it is still comparable to caddys highest level ....Hell the CTS-V comes stock with a blower..it should be smoking a C63 with a tune and headers. Although the caddy is quite a bit cheaper then a C63..their platforms also been out for 10x longert

that CTS-V does sound sick though petro
Originally Posted by Merc63
Sounds great petro, love the hint of a loopy idle.

I looked at getting into a ctsv but I just like the feel of the c63 better and not cause it's a Benz I could care less about that crap.
Thanks guys.

I loved my C63. I wasn't trying to put it down in any way, it's a great car. For me the Caddy is a better overall vehicle. Others will feel differently and that's fine. I'm a car guy first, I don't care about the emblem on the trunk. Benz, BMW's, Audi's, GTR's, makes no difference to me, they're all special in their own way.
Old 05-29-2014, 11:38 PM
  #64  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,122
Received 300 Likes on 193 Posts
10 C six trizzle
Originally Posted by PetroC63
Thanks guys.

I loved my C63. I wasn't trying to put it down in any way, it's a great car. For me the Caddy is a better overall vehicle. Others will feel differently and that's fine. I'm a car guy first, I don't care about the emblem on the trunk. Benz, BMW's, Audi's, GTR's, makes no difference to me, they're all special in their own way.
+1 respect.
I agree although im plenty guilty of bashing stuff on a regular basis they all do something well, and are fun.
Old 05-30-2014, 01:11 AM
  #65  
Junior Member
 
changster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R35 Alpha 12 GTR, MB C63 Amg Estate
Originally Posted by PetroC63
Thanks guys.

I loved my C63. I wasn't trying to put it down in any way, it's a great car. For me the Caddy is a better overall vehicle. Others will feel differently and that's fine. I'm a car guy first, I don't care about the emblem on the trunk. Benz, BMW's, Audi's, GTR's, makes no difference to me, they're all special in their own way.
The C63 exudes so much more class than the CTSV. My own opinion though.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CTS-V vs Weistec Stage 3 Vs Longtube header/tune C63



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.