C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Gadget's Dyno Test

Old 07-19-2014, 09:58 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Gadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Maryland USA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
06 E55 AMG, 13 C63 AMG
Gadget's Dyno Test

I had my C63 on the rack changing the rear diff fluid and thought it would be a good time to back it up a bit onto the dyno and get a base line run.

My car is a 2013 C63 Coupe P31 w/LSD. 1900 miles on it.

Dyno is a DynoJet 224xLC

After running the base line I remembered I bought a set of ROW air boxes from a member here and decided to install them and get an after run to compare.




The base line was a bit higher than expected, but it is what it is.

The ROW dyno was also a greater gain than expected. I really don't believe it was that much. The reason for this is the cross section of the air box area where the MAF is (the part that is different between the ROW and stock) seems to be bigger than the fresh are ducting to the air filter box. I would think that the ducting would be the point of greater restriction and the enlarged MAF duct would not make much difference.

Anyway the gain is clearly there.

Peak gain is 22.62 RWHP and 18.38 RWTQ

Maximum gain is 24.38 RWHP at 6726 RPM and 23.36 RWTQ at 4800

Road test is a definite seat of the pants increase.

Now, the big question I had was if there was significant amount of induced MAF Sensor Error. I connected a scan tool and looked for the difference in long term fuel trim deviation.

Steady 60 MPH

Stock +1 and -1 ROW +3 and +4

Idle

Stock +3 and +4 ROW +7 and +9

Seems that this is a very simple mod using OEM parts that actually increases power and there does not seem to be any negative side affects.

I do not rent dyno time, but if any of you are in the Southern Maryland area and want to do before and after dyno testing, contact me. If your project interests me we can strap it down and see.

G
Old 07-19-2014, 10:19 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
glennhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 608
Received 38 Likes on 28 Posts
2011 C63
I really want to believe this because I also put ROW airboxes on my car. And it was not to just eliminate the charcoal filter, it was mainly to have a full bell mouth on the MAF inlet.

I do believe that there is a gain, but if it's really this much, then I am ecstatic! Cheapest Horsepower you can have for the C63, since the ROW air boxes are only around $320 for the pair.

Did you reuse the stock air filters, or did you go with a K&N or AFE?
Old 07-20-2014, 10:23 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,044
Received 2,809 Likes on 1,664 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
I like posts like this. Facts and figures are great. Although 22whp from ROW boxes sounds ridiculous, you backed it up with numbers. Great. Thanks for posting.
The following users liked this post:
NotABaller (06-20-2017)
Old 07-20-2014, 11:11 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
odonnks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: North of Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 408
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Truck, 2014 C63 AMG 507
Great informative post.

I'm new to MB and still learning my way around the car and this forum.
Do all US C63's have the more restrictive air boxes?
Even the Black Series and 507?
Old 07-20-2014, 01:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
edwardsflight33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: West Texas
Posts: 396
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
'16 CLS 63 S
Originally Posted by odonnks
Great informative post.

I'm new to MB and still learning my way around the car and this forum.
Do all US C63's have the more restrictive air boxes?
Even the Black Series and 507?
Yep.
Old 07-20-2014, 04:10 PM
  #6  
SPONSOR
 
RW Carbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 2,766
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
C190 GT C
Wow that's really impressive gains with just an intake! Thanks for posting up the dynos
Old 07-20-2014, 05:28 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,491
Received 429 Likes on 352 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Nice looking graphs. I already have the carbon filter delete and Weistec filters. Makes me want to try the ROW box tops. Did you take the carbon filters out or change the air filters before you put the ROW boxes on?

The base line results may look a little high but I have seen those kind of results before on a dynojet.

Nice post.
Old 07-20-2014, 05:52 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Ingenieur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
C63 AMG
This makes sense to me
After reading the oe tuning blog a question I had been asking was answered
What accounts for the delta between the e63 and c63?
They limit throttling opening > 5000 rpm
What is 100% open TB on the e63 is less, say 90% (or whatever) even though the pedal is 100%
To get the same rated power with the row box all they did is limit it a bit more, say 88% or something
Same rating all markets
When the row box is put in the us car more air flows (the same as more throttle) and hence more power
The ecu parameters ( fuel, timing, etc) have enough headroom to compensate

So all the tune needs to do is de-limit the throttle and perhaps increase the air/fueling map some

The oe tune and row box imo is a safe tune
Old 07-20-2014, 07:07 PM
  #9  
Super Member

 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 579
Received 40 Likes on 37 Posts
S63
OP, is your car tuned?
Old 07-20-2014, 08:49 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Thor2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 Coupe
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt
OP, is your car tuned?

With those numbers it would have to be.
Old 07-20-2014, 11:42 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Conv_GSDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 568
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
'18 Audi A4
Interesting read. Was thinking of doing this already but this now provides a clearer picture.
Old 07-21-2014, 08:03 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,491
Received 429 Likes on 352 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt
OP, is your car tuned?
Originally Posted by Thor2j
With those numbers it would have to be.
The car has the factory tune P31 option.
Old 07-21-2014, 10:29 AM
  #13  
Super Member

 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 579
Received 40 Likes on 37 Posts
S63
Originally Posted by Mort
The car has the factory tune P31 option.
428 is pretty high isn't it?
Old 07-21-2014, 02:08 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,491
Received 429 Likes on 352 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt
428 is pretty high isn't it?

Gadget did say it was a baseline on his 2013 C63 Coupe P31 w/LSD. 1900 miles on it.

I agree it looks on the high side but conditions vary as do dynos and dyno operators. I have seen other P31 dyno results in this area on a dynojet. I guess a tuned car might show 15 - 20 higher on this dyno under similar conditions.
Old 07-21-2014, 02:14 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Ingenieur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
C63 AMG
assuming 481 crank/428 wheel that is about an 11% loss
that is in line with what rototest got on a steady state test




Performance Powertrain performance
Wheel power 299 (407 / 401) kW (PS / bhp) at 1/min 6513
Total wheel torque / total reduction 522 (385) Nm (lb-ft) at 1/min 4814

Stated engine performance
Engine power 336 (457 / 451) kW (PS / bhp) at 1/min 6800
Engine torque 600 (443) Nm (lb-ft)

Last edited by Ingenieur; 07-21-2014 at 02:21 PM.
Old 08-02-2014, 09:01 AM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
Heath T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Where can you purchase the ROW boxes?
Old 08-02-2014, 09:40 AM
  #17  
Member
 
PanzerLehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mostly Pennsylvania
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 C63
I know Renntech and Weistec sells or sold them at one point. I think Weistec is around $600
I was thinking about getting myself some but I passed I want to go to the driving school before I do much else to my car. Plus I have no self control once I get started.
Old 08-02-2014, 11:47 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
edwardsflight33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: West Texas
Posts: 396
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
'16 CLS 63 S
oediscountparts is an option too
Old 08-02-2014, 01:37 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,044
Received 2,809 Likes on 1,664 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Call Tracy at oediscountparts.com. She knows the drill and will hook you up with cheap ROW boxes.
Old 09-25-2015, 01:12 AM
  #20  
Member
 
geri1310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 80
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Gadget
I had my C63 on the rack changing the rear diff fluid and thought it would be a good time to back it up a bit onto the dyno and get a base line run.

My car is a 2013 C63 Coupe P31 w/LSD. 1900 miles on it.

Dyno is a DynoJet 224xLC

After running the base line I remembered I bought a set of ROW air boxes from a member here and decided to install them and get an after run to compare.




The base line was a bit higher than expected, but it is what it is.

The ROW dyno was also a greater gain than expected. I really don't believe it was that much. The reason for this is the cross section of the air box area where the MAF is (the part that is different between the ROW and stock) seems to be bigger than the fresh are ducting to the air filter box. I would think that the ducting would be the point of greater restriction and the enlarged MAF duct would not make much difference.

Anyway the gain is clearly there.

Peak gain is 22.62 RWHP and 18.38 RWTQ

Maximum gain is 24.38 RWHP at 6726 RPM and 23.36 RWTQ at 4800

Road test is a definite seat of the pants increase.

Now, the big question I had was if there was significant amount of induced MAF Sensor Error. I connected a scan tool and looked for the difference in long term fuel trim deviation.

Steady 60 MPH

Stock +1 and -1 ROW +3 and +4

Idle

Stock +3 and +4 ROW +7 and +9

Seems that this is a very simple mod using OEM parts that actually increases power and there does not seem to be any negative side affects.

I do not rent dyno time, but if any of you are in the Southern Maryland area and want to do before and after dyno testing, contact me. If your project interests me we can strap it down and see.

G

Do you remember what filters were used? K&N, AFE.... thanks
Old 09-25-2015, 09:56 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Gadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Maryland USA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
06 E55 AMG, 13 C63 AMG
I used the stock filters that came with the car.

I refuse to run any oil soak air filters. I have seen so many problems with those over the years I won't do it. K&N are the worst ever.

The filters I make under my own brand are dry synthetic filter media.

G
Old 09-25-2015, 10:01 AM
  #22  
Member
 
geri1310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 80
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Gadget
I used the stock filters that came with the car.

I refuse to run any oil soak air filters. I have seen so many problems with those over the years I won't do it. K&N are the worst ever.

The filters I make under my own brand are dry synthetic filter media.

G
Interesting, do you have a site or somewhere we can check those out at?
Old 09-25-2015, 10:03 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Gadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southern Maryland USA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
06 E55 AMG, 13 C63 AMG
I do not have anything that fits Mercedes. I don't want to get in trouble here but I bet if you poke around enough you can find it.

G
Old 09-25-2015, 10:17 AM
  #24  
Member
 
geri1310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 80
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Gadget
I do not have anything that fits Mercedes. I don't want to get in trouble here but I bet if you poke around enough you can find it.

G
#ninja

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Gadget's Dyno Test



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.