Which is more important: Mileage vs Age?
Car 1
2011 with 48k miles
Car 2
2009 with 22k miles
Which car would you choose? Assuming both have clean carfax and were well taken care of, would you take the newer with more mileage or older with less mileage? Why or why not? Thanks
Also, should I try to find a certified pre owned? And are the extended warranties worth the cash? I plan on keeping this car for at least 5+ years.
Last edited by electivedeals; Dec 7, 2014 at 07:14 PM.
CPO waranties are usually decent, at least for big-ticket items. Aftermerket - at least here in Canada - are not worth the paper they are printed on, but it could be different elsewhere. And, do keep the operating costs in mind, There are nor cheap cars and both are at the point where your're going to have to start putting money into them.
Otherwise, both with good history, I would go newer.
Trending Topics
As roadtalontsi mentioned though, if the car sat because it had a problem they didn't/couldn't afford to fix then low miles will be misleading. Thus the need to know the full service history. Did they still change the oil even if it hadn't hit 5000 miles but it was past a certain amount of time since the last change?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG







