C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

opinions? better transmission the original reg auto or MCT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-16-2016, 07:46 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dark_Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GT2 C63 and yo sister
opinions? better transmission the original reg auto or MCT

so which transmission is better
Old 01-17-2016, 11:04 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,491
Received 429 Likes on 352 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Depends on what you will be using the car for. I really have no strong preference for the type of street driving I do as I seldom need quick manual shifts and S or S+ generally suits my needs. I have owned C63s with both transmissions.

It has been said that the torque converter is better for the drag strip and maybe the MCT is better for street and road circuit.
Old 01-18-2016, 10:17 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
The MCT is a stronger tranny, but I like the torque converter for around town and drag strip.
Old 01-18-2016, 11:31 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dark_Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GT2 C63 and yo sister
Im really just trying to make myself feel better since I dont have the CT, I didnt want the facelift, because its not as aggressive looking as my '11
Old 01-18-2016, 12:07 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
I feel the same way, that's why I went with the original. The face lift didn't do it for me.
Old 01-18-2016, 12:32 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
The MCT is a wet clutch and the 7g has a torque converter. Torque converters are always notoriously slower. Take for instance any kind of drilling mechanism that uses a torque converter. You are essentially just "dumbing down" power to get it to where you want. The MCT has the ability to use a multi-clutch system to "rearrange" the power as needed.

I was actually reading about (and from my knowledge of torque converters), I have known that torque converters are beefier and take more abuse because they lack the extra clutches that an MCT has. The torque converter is slower but stronger. The MCT is weaker yet faster....

Input?
Old 01-18-2016, 12:39 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
JeffDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
C63
i've owned both and liked the 7g better.
Old 01-18-2016, 01:23 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dark_Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GT2 C63 and yo sister
not many magazines tested the MCT version, Id love to see a head to head comparison
Old 01-18-2016, 06:28 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
realjones88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 446
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
2012 C63 P31 sedan
The MCT is a better transmission. It is found in nearly all higher end AMGs. It shifts faster and has more modes. The 7G is still found in the bottom trim level cars. Would Mercedes put the better transmission in the lower end cars? Of course not.

That doesn't mean the 7G is bad, but the MCT is the newer iteration.
Old 01-18-2016, 06:46 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
The MCT is much faster than the 7G. The 7G can handle 900 hp with no issues. Look at DadsC63 I think he was running the 7G his entire time through mods.

In 2008-2011, was the C63 the only car getting the 7G while all others were getting the MCT? Was the 2008-2011 E63 getting an MCT? Can't recall...

It's obvious that they were unloading it on the entry level C.

Would of loved to have the MCT but I don't think I would be spending much time in regular S....It was just be C,S and M for me (which would be S+).
Old 01-18-2016, 07:36 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
realjones88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 446
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
2012 C63 P31 sedan
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
In 2008-2011, was the C63 the only car getting the 7G while all others were getting the MCT? Was the 2008-2011 E63 getting an MCT? Can't recall...
The oval headlight 07-09 E63 had the 7G tronic through the end of the W211 platform of MY 2009. In MY 2010 the E63 switched to the W212 platform with the MCT.
Old 01-18-2016, 08:31 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Arjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 566
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
2020 AMG C63 Coupe, 2012 C63 AMG Coupe, 1989 560SL
I think the advantage of the MCT is the shifts are more responsive and quicker in manual mode. my car shifts REALLY hard at WOT though, like thrashing you in your seat. i wonder if the 7G is a bit smoother due to the torque converter
Old 01-18-2016, 09:29 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Bigtickets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 366
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
E55K, Black on Black. C63, Black on Black. SRT-10 NightRunner 363of400
The MCT has more heat issues than the torque converter. Doesn't matter how fast the MCT is if your limping around
Old 01-19-2016, 09:14 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
ENVē's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 793
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
2001 Porsche 911 Turbo (heavily modified)
The MCT has shuddering in very cold weather. Almost like clutch chatter. Only from a roll at a stop sign though. Take foot off brake and start to creep forward and it shudders some. Happens in the cold. Also when you first pull away in cold temps the shifting is abrupt. Once it warms up it is all good. Tq converter trans doesnt do this. I love the MCT though. It suits the car. The SMGIII in the M5 was a lot more jarring.
Old 01-19-2016, 10:16 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,092
Received 285 Likes on 183 Posts
10 C six trizzle
The torque converter and mct are both the 7g transmission. The mct is better suited for lighter cars like the c63. While i cant tell you weather the torque converter or mct is stronger itself I can say the torque converter transmissions are rated for 700nm and the mct equipped are rated for 1000nm. Although externally they are the same, internally the mct equipped got additional clutch packs and revisions.

If you are looking for smooth liquid flowing power and sit in stop and go traffic regularly id go with the torque converter transmission. If you dont mind some awkward but livable low speed jerkiness at times with noticeably quicker shifts and more aggressive response go with the mct.
Old 01-19-2016, 11:48 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
I like the raw feeling the mct has driving slow around town.It suits the car more and feels more of a drivers car.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: opinions? better transmission the original reg auto or MCT



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 AM.