Aussie Supercharged C63 Build
#51
Newbie
The kit does not include spare rear tires.
#52
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#53
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Quick update. Weistec are sending our replacement clutches (not yet arrived unfortuantely) New TCU unit also being installed as a preventative measure.
Hopefully car will be back together and ready to run next month.
In the meantime couple of quick pics showing the power progression from Stock to Headers to Supercharged and lastly the new Sledgehammer pulley system from Magnuson installed and tuned with HP tuners (almost doubled the power from stock at this stage). Will update qtr times once run.
Next steps will be head bolts, SLS buckets, drag slicks and more boost
Performance tracking
Magnuson Sledgehammer upgrade installed
Hopefully car will be back together and ready to run next month.
In the meantime couple of quick pics showing the power progression from Stock to Headers to Supercharged and lastly the new Sledgehammer pulley system from Magnuson installed and tuned with HP tuners (almost doubled the power from stock at this stage). Will update qtr times once run.
Next steps will be head bolts, SLS buckets, drag slicks and more boost
Performance tracking
Magnuson Sledgehammer upgrade installed
#54
SPONSOR
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes
on
570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
amazing Dave! we've been messaging each other on YouTube. haha.
any idea what HP this might translate to for a Dynojet? it seems the dyno you are using is one that rates low like mustang dumps do. conversion to horsepower is looking between 575-583 rwhp or so.
any idea what HP this might translate to for a Dynojet? it seems the dyno you are using is one that rates low like mustang dumps do. conversion to horsepower is looking between 575-583 rwhp or so.
#55
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG 507 Edition
Not that it matters much now, but I agree that stock dyno figure does seem very low. On a hot day on that very same dyno at VCM my stock 507 measured 300rwkw. Strange that yours measured so low.
In any case, lack of power does not seem to be an issue now...
In any case, lack of power does not seem to be an issue now...
#56
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yep, I thought the dyno results were a bit low but they have been consistent through the upgrades and the qtr times/mph corrolate well. The first figure was run basically straight after I bought the car so maybe was in dire need of a service and a good thrashing to waken it up
Will be interesting to get a qtr time with the new power along with some sticky tyres, I am hoping for a mid 10, maybe a bit quicker if it hooks up well.
Will be interesting to get a qtr time with the new power along with some sticky tyres, I am hoping for a mid 10, maybe a bit quicker if it hooks up well.
#57
SPONSOR
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes
on
570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
using basic math to compare roughly versus the Magnuson published dyno graph...it looks like roughly this translates to 494.7 kW = 663 whp...but this should only be taken with a grain of salt. without a real comparison on the same dyno this number really means nothing.
Magnuson published dyno as a comparison
Magnuson published dyno as a comparison
#58
MBWorld Fanatic!
Between your stock and sledgehammer test, you went from 227 to 429 kw which is a crazy gain 304hp to 575hp, a gain of 270hp or almost doubling your power level.
304hp is a crazy low dyno reading, so either that dyno reads about 100 hp lower than average dyno's stock or something else is funny with your stock number.
304hp is a crazy low dyno reading, so either that dyno reads about 100 hp lower than average dyno's stock or something else is funny with your stock number.
#59
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Between your stock and sledgehammer test, you went from 227 to 429 kw which is a crazy gain 304hp to 575hp, a gain of 270hp or almost doubling your power level.
304hp is a crazy low dyno reading, so either that dyno reads about 100 hp lower than average dyno's stock or something else is funny with your stock number.
304hp is a crazy low dyno reading, so either that dyno reads about 100 hp lower than average dyno's stock or something else is funny with your stock number.
#61
MBWorld Fanatic!
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 385
Received 35 Likes
on
31 Posts
2010 C63
Spot on - from another thread.
I have just had the Sledgehammer pulley installed on my car. Great design, we increased the boost from ~5.5psi to 11psi with some great gains. Looking forward to putting in some more boost later this year.
Some pics and dyno results in my build thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ml#post7048638
Some pics and dyno results in my build thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ml#post7048638
#64
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yep agreed the stock reading seems low, the car seemed to pull well when i first picked it up but felt much better after the headers, tune and service. Unfortunately i didnt get a qtr mile time before i started modifying the car so cant compare times. Im really only interested in real world results (qtrs) going forward so will be interesting to see how it goes
#65
Member
My bad. Didn't really go through the graphs to see what they were. I was eyeing the overdrive kit also, but I am genuinely concerned about running more boost especially because i don't have p31, so was interested in seeing what other people are running. I'm currently on 7.5psi, trying to figure out what is a "safe" number to run.
#66
im running factory bottom end none p31 with 60mm pulley 13psi car makes 680whp with ms109
day to day 600hp on 67mm 10psi
only reason i capped at 680whp is because we run out of injector
day to day 600hp on 67mm 10psi
only reason i capped at 680whp is because we run out of injector
#67
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My bad. Didn't really go through the graphs to see what they were. I was eyeing the overdrive kit also, but I am genuinely concerned about running more boost especially because i don't have p31, so was interested in seeing what other people are running. I'm currently on 7.5psi, trying to figure out what is a "safe" number to run.
I will be looking at doing headbolts, SLS buckets and forged pistons later in the year to ensure no future issues
#68
MBWorld Fanatic!
#69
Member
#73
SPONSOR
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes
on
570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
once the transmission is in, do you think you could record your RPM during driving and racing with the new transmission? I'd like to see what a difference the new transmission makes in regards to shift speed and quality.
Thank you.
Thank you.
#74
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Yep, no problem. I have quite a few videos of qtr mile runs with the standard transmission so can easily do some comparison videos for you.
#75