skratch77

I guess you missed my point as thinking the car ran like crap because of the tape.it has absolutely no affect on why the car ran bad as it's before the air filters and no way near the maf sensors.the point I was making is you could yank the whole front intake off and it would not make the car buck and studder with any load over 20% throttle.

renntech also re designed there box with a v2 and moved the air meters and changed the stacks flowing the air smooth over the meters.

I wish I could find someone using the bocas to see if I'm missing anything but I have yet to find anyone.every person that I found on here were people selling them because I can gauranty there car ran like **** with them installed.

skratch77

going to dyno Tom morning with updated file.

skratch77

did like 9 pulls as the tires were brick cold and the car kept spinning the tires on the dyno.after 3 restraps and some sticky spray on the rollers it picked up 15rwt and HP lost 2hp but it was like the 9th pull back to back.

that was uncorrect but to be fair we used SAE because today the baro pressure was 29.01 vs 30.04 last week and SAE the car made 10whp more and 20rwt more today then it did last week

I'm happy 395rwt 435whp after retune

AMGonFire

so what was the change? Updated tune?

skratch77

yes I sent the logs to Jeremy and told him the car was smooth on the dyno and set to zero and the car was consistent back to back 4 pulls and he agreed there was more grunt in it and added more mid range torque and top end.

today the dyno conditions were not as good as last week.last week the baro pressure was really good and today was the lowest I have seen in a long time.29.01vs 30.04 so without testing the new file last week on the same day with excellent conditions we used SAE to compare to last week.

here is SAE today and it was pull number 8 vs last week SAE but to be fair last week's baro made the software pull power as it used a .96 cf

im waiting for all the files but run 5 was like 435whp but I took a picture of run 8 vs last week using SAE.

the car made 30rwt vs the old file going SAE but in real life the car really made 380rwt last week vs what it's saying today.so the new file picked up 15rwt not 30 like the sheet says..i wish I had the new file last week to run them back to back.but the car on the street definitely picked up power.tgis is the first time I broke loose in 4th gear in the cold where the car would never do that and was spinning the tires on the dyno also.

you guys will laugh when you see the roller coaster pulls on run 1-4

here is run 8! used this one because the run with 435whp had torque all over the place as it was spinning on the dyno.you can see where he adjusted the mid range and up from there.it rained this morning and the tires were also wet so that didn't help


when I get the run files I will post both runs uncorrected together.im always saying you put down what you put down and like going to the track you run what you run.im posting all info and conditions.the only difference other then the conditions was updated tune and sunoko 93 vs Mobil 93 gas in the tank and bottom line uncorrected the car made 16rwt and lost 2hp up top but it was ran 9 times on the dyno and baro was not as good

BLKROKT

That's not exactly right. Time is absolute and measures exactly the same no matter where you go (on Earth and at sub-lightspeed). Dynos are not - every single one reads differently and can vary widely based on atmospheric conditions and operator setup.

skratch77

exactly why I'm putting everything out there.like I said today's atmosphere was horrible and I hate using correction factors to raise numbers.

bottom line uncorrected the car picked up a good amount of mid range and kept same or could of made more power up top if I didn't need to do 9 pulls this morning

here are all the runs from today. I picked std CF and got 442whp.you can see how bad the car was spinning also.