Visual difference between 1 piece and 2 piece front rotors?
This morning, i was at the dealership for another reason, and I asked one of the parts people about the part number for the replacement rotors on the shop no-charge inhouse invoice. It is shown as 212-421-05-12. The parts man insists this is the correct part number for the P30 rotors. If so, I am surprised - that was an expensive pre-sale repair.
Is that actually the correct part number for 2 piece rotors?
And, since I know nothing about MB brake configurations yet, what is the visual difference between the 1 piece and 2 piece that is readily apparent without removing a wheel? (So I can take a closer look)
Jim G








http://smg.photobucket.com/user/craz...d8a4e.jpg.html
Regular look solid between the rotor and the hat.
https://www.ramspeed.com.au/wp-conte...-Caliper-2.jpg
http://smg.photobucket.com/user/craz...d8a4e.jpg.html
Regular look solid between the rotor and the hat.
https://www.ramspeed.com.au/wp-conte...-Caliper-2.jpg
Jim G
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Jim G
-Patel
Not that I asked for it, but my dealership recommended p31 rotors/pads all around last time I was there and quoted me nearly $5K for it
-Patel
I know that $5k seems awfully costly, but on a car that in Canada goes for mid to high 90s new (2017 model with typical options), the braking system is probably one of 3 areas that MB bought pretty good components for (the other two are engine and electronics). If you look at the car magazine published stopping distances for a C63 with P31 package, they are definitely in the "premium sports car" class. When you buy a car in this cost class, one of the benefits is the extra measure of safety that premium mpriced components can provide.
I myself figure I'll never likely have to spend that money again (although I figure I've already paid for it once in the price I paid for this very nice condition car with its brand new brakes), as my Vancouver Island travel distances are short enough that I historically put on only about 400 to 450 miles per month, I drive rather conservatively and gently,and I am now starting out with brand new rotors and pads. If I ever need to make a very rapid highway stop to avoid a collision, and the better brakes make the stopping distance just enough shorter to avoid that collision, the costly brakes will have paid for themselves.
I can totally understand though a C63 owner who does not drive aggressively, or go to the track at all, subbing 1 piece rotors when a brake job is required, because let's face it, the 1-piece rotors are very close to being as good when the emergency usage is not frequent or prolonged. For track use, or aggressive driving though, it seems to me the better braking, and short life super sticky costly tires, make sense. Especially for the track, or on a many-miles winding road being driven with "spirited abandon", even though the cost makes you choke, because they make a big difference in that kind of usage.
Jim G




https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...63-brakes.html
Last edited by BLKROKT; Apr 18, 2017 at 09:39 PM.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...63-brakes.html
Jim G


Jim G
However, when Jim asked me a few days ago where I got my car serviced I had no hesitation telling him I get my cars serviced at this shop. It takes me 2 hr to get there but I take it up island even though there is a dealership in the same organization just 30 minutes away.
When I first came to the island the service department had some good and some bad techs and the shop management was pretty poor.
However when the new and current Service Manager came on board things changed and these guys at this dealership are fantastic in my view. Thoughtful, helpful and competent and they care and treat you with respect all the way.
What I cannot figure out is why the more local shop is not like this one being in the same organization.
It is too bad they all cannot be as good as these guys.



