When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
2018 750i Msport, 2018 Range Rover Autobiography, 2019 C63, 2017 F Type R
What's up guys for those who don't believe that is my real dyno post here you can watch the dyno video at the end and see what I put down with your own eyes
You have a 9k dollar exhaust system. that's not stock and you probably have a piggy back boost manipulation to up the boost tricking the car is seeing less boost.
Even in your video that Dyno shows a before run with lower numbers.
Stock 63s make around 467-475whp and 480rwt
Here is a normal dyno that don't have 100 more torque than yours and don't fall on it's face after 4500 rpms.
2018 750i Msport, 2018 Range Rover Autobiography, 2019 C63, 2017 F Type R
Originally Posted by skratch77
You have a 9k dollar exhaust system. that's not stock and you probably have a piggy back boost manipulation to up the boost tricking the car is seeing less boost.
Even in your video that Dyno shows a before run with lower numbers.
Stock 63s make around 467-475whp and 480rwt
Here is a normal dyno that don't have 100 more torque than yours and don't fall on it's face after 4500 rpms.
So you're here to tell me what I have done to my car? Not sure how else i can prove to you what my car made and what is done to it. The smaller number is another reading the dyno gives out that is not relevant to the wheel horsepower. My stock dyno sheet was posted earlier in which you claimed it was fake and did not belong to my car. Would you like a pic of my engine bay as well to find the "piggyback".
So you're here to tell me what I have done to my car? Not sure how else i can prove to you what my car made and what is done to it. The smaller number is another reading the dyno gives out that is not relevant to the wheel horsepower. My stock dyno sheet was posted earlier in which you claimed it was fake and did not belong to my car. Would you like a pic of my engine bay as well to find the "piggyback".
Your own video says 9k dollar exhaust system bro.do you have any idea how much power freeing up a turbo car makes.
You also have downpipes and probably deleted your cats.how the hell can you call your dyno stock?
Most bolt on 204 will out trap you and we are make 200ftlbs less torque than your weird dyno sheet
So how do you explain your car making significantly more power than other C63s?
Do you honestly believe that your "stock" C63 is making 600 wtq, or 700 ft-lb at the crank? You apparently have one run to show it.
Dude, he made 480/570 completely bone stock. Then with downpipes he made 510/600. According to my math, that's 2 separate runs, on two completely different days.
2018 750i Msport, 2018 Range Rover Autobiography, 2019 C63, 2017 F Type R
Originally Posted by skratch77
Your own video says 9k dollar exhaust system bro.do you have any idea how much power freeing up a turbo car makes.
You also have downpipes and probably deleted your cats.how the hell can you call your dyno stock?
Most bolt on 204 will out trap you and we are make 200ftlbs less torque than your weird dyno sheet
From what i recall if you look at your own c63 quarter mile times i would be in the top 30 fastest 204 according to your quarter mile times and I dont even have a damn tune im just catless lmao
Dude, he made 480/570 completely bone stock. Then with downpipes he made 510/600. According to my math, that's 2 separate runs, on two completely different days.
And? 570 wtq is close enough to 600, and translates to nearly 700 at the crank. Bull****. No way a truly stock C63 is making 20-25% more power than Mercedes advertises it is making.
From what i recall if you look at your own c63 quarter mile time i would be in the top 30 fastest 204 according to your quarter mile times and I dont even have a damn tune im just catless lmao
I trap 121-122 with cats and stock resonators and stock exhaust.
Sick wheres your slip and also just because you have stock exhaust doesn't mean your car is stock lol. Then your car would make no sense what so ever.
My slips have been posted ...my point is you spent 10 grand and took your cats put and not really making much power over tuned 204s I trapped 118 on tune and air filters only and the tune cost me 700 bucks.
Now with headers I'm in the 120mph traps and can still inprove it by taking the cats out and cutting the resonators out along with getting an exhaust but the car sounds mean as hell and it's making enough power for now.
2018 750i Msport, 2018 Range Rover Autobiography, 2019 C63, 2017 F Type R
Originally Posted by skratch77
My slips have been posted ...my point is you spent 10 grand and took your cats put and not really making much power over tuned 204s I trapped 118 on tune and air filters only and the tune cost me 700 bucks.
Now with headers I'm in the 120mph traps and can still inprove it by taking the cats out and cutting the resonators out along with getting an exhaust but the car sounds mean as hell and it's making enough power for now.
What is the point of this stupid thread anyways.
Why are you so obsessed with this exhaust that I am sponsored for anyways so price wasnt really a big factor. I have no tune no nothing and did the exact same with a much much better et on a stock catless car. Not sure why you can't just admit these new twin turbo amgs are much faster than the N/A days plain and simple. Also im sure you're headers car is catless and how is headers considered stock exhaust?
Why are you so obsessed with this exhaust that I am sponsored for anyways so price wasnt really a big factor. I have no tune no nothing and did the exact same with a much much better et on a stock catless car. Not sure why you can't just admit these new twin turbo amgs are much faster than the N/A days plain and simple.
Great. Go have a circlejerk over it in the W205 section. Your bull**** just stinks over here.
Why are you so obsessed with this exhaust that I am sponsored for anyways so price wasnt really a big factor. I have no tune no nothing and did the exact same with a much much better et on a stock catless car. Not sure why you can't just admit these new twin turbo amgs are much faster than the N/A days plain and simple. Also im sure you're headers car is catless and how is headers considered stock exhaust?
Because your torque numbers and the way your car falls on it's face after 4800 rpms only make sense if you have a piggy back and downpipes.
I posted real stock 205s in this thread my friend has one and was trapping 114-115 Friday night at New England dragway.
I'm good, but thanks for the offer. If I wanted help, I'd ask the people here who don't hide behind one off numbers that make no sense if you have more than half a brain.
2018 750i Msport, 2018 Range Rover Autobiography, 2019 C63, 2017 F Type R
Originally Posted by skratch77
Because your torque numbers and the way your car falls on it's face after 4800 rpms only make sense if you have a piggy back and downpipes.
I posted real stock 205s in this thread my friend has one and was trapping 114-115 Friday night at New England dragway.
It’s a know fact these cars fall on their face with stock turbos but you’d have no clue and your friends car is slow as **** because I trapped 119 stock but good luck with your 204 life.
10-22-2017, 10:39 PM
