C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Front Inside Tire Wear... again

Old 04-02-2019, 01:22 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Dogtag114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 918
Received 115 Likes on 70 Posts
2009 c63
Front Inside Tire Wear... again

Does this happen to everyone? I had this in my last set, got an alignment 3? Years ago... and still this?

PSS ... maybe better with PS4?

are these driveble... or should I get new before taking off winters?



Old 04-02-2019, 01:26 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
BLKSHRK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 42
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
C63 AMG
I would replace them. If they wore that edge that fast they won’t last much longer.

What at are your alignment settings?

I’ve had good luck with running -1 camber and no toe both front and rear.
Old 04-02-2019, 01:42 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 463
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
2014 C63 Coupe
Looks like excessive toe-in up front causing scrubbing like that. Three years is probably (ok definitely) too long to wait in between alignments especially if you daily drive it.
Old 04-02-2019, 01:53 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vladds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 1,168
Received 126 Likes on 96 Posts
2010 C63 2019 GLA45
At how many miles did you find this?
For me the dealer alignment made the difference.
Old 04-02-2019, 02:56 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
toosteeley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 447
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
Present: 2019 C43 Estate
As LudeDude said, it's likely the toe-in which won't be eliminated if you're doing "factory" alignments. Next time, make sure to ask them to set the toe to "0".
Old 04-02-2019, 04:09 PM
  #6  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Dogtag114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 918
Received 115 Likes on 70 Posts
2009 c63
Originally Posted by toosteeley
As LudeDude said, it's likely the toe-in which won't be eliminated if you're doing "factory" alignments. Next time, make sure to ask them to set the toe to "0".
ok... found it...almost 3 yrs ago to the day... on summers maybe 25k miles on these? (Rears are another story we all know)

this is is what they set it to

Old 04-02-2019, 04:53 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
95viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 43 Posts
2007 cls550
It’s camber wear. Not adjustable unless you use oem camber caster bolts to fix adjust a little or things can get pricey with adjustable arms or bushings but can dial into 0.
Old 04-02-2019, 05:34 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 463
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
2014 C63 Coupe
Originally Posted by 95viper
It’s camber wear. Not adjustable unless you use oem camber caster bolts to fix adjust a little or things can get pricey with adjustable arms or bushings but can dial into 0.
It's not camber wear. Although that can happen, wear due to toe is much more prevalent than wear due to camber. In addition, the scrubbing nature of that wear is certainly due to toe; it happens on the inside due to camber but if the static camber was zero, the whole face of the tire would look like that.

OP: your car has toe in in the rear (some is good for high speed stability) and toe out on one tire and toe in on the other up front. Also...25K miles on those fronts?!? That's enough anyway. Time for new If you want to extend the life of the tires then replace them and make sure you get as close to zero toe up front as possible.

Just as an example, here's what my last alignment looked like:



Last edited by Ludedude; 04-02-2019 at 05:43 PM. Reason: Added photo
The following users liked this post:
BLKSHRK (04-02-2019)
Old 04-02-2019, 05:39 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
95viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 43 Posts
2007 cls550
Originally Posted by Ludedude
It's not camber wear. Although that can happen, wear due to toe is much more prevalent than wear due to camber. In addition, the scrubbing nature of that wear is certainly due to toe; it happens on the inside due to camber but if the static camber was zero, the whole face of the tire would look like that.

OP: your car has toe in in the rear (some is good for high speed stability) and toe out up front. I bet it handles lively and the car turns in and changes directions quickly as that's a great auto-cross alignment setup but not good for longevity. Also...25K miles on those fronts?!? That's enough anyway. Time for new If you want to extend the life of the tires then replace them and make sure you get as close to zero toe up front as possible.
Not camber, really? -1.7 and -1.4 as opposed to 0.13 toe settings.

Yea I would be worried about toe with those settings and the inside edge wear.
Old 04-02-2019, 05:47 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 463
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
2014 C63 Coupe
Originally Posted by 95viper
Not camber, really? -1.7 and -1.4 as opposed to 0.13 toe settings.

Yea I would be worried about toe with those settings and the inside edge wear.
Yea, really. The wear is not even, the tires are cupped and scrubbed and that's not due to camber but rather toe.

I've run way more camber (-3.0+) up front on track cars that I also drove on the street and they don't look that way, even with Hoosier R comps or even slicks. Camber wear is nice and even, not chunked to hell. I get that it's the easy answer because you can see the camber, but it's just not accurate. Toe (in or out) is a much greater contributor to wear than camber is.
Old 04-02-2019, 05:55 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,216
Received 1,572 Likes on 925 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
It's the combo of toe out AND negative camber with over 25k miles. Looks like normal wear to me with that alignment.

I am currently at 0 toe up front and I think I'll dial in some toe out again. I ran 1/16" total toe out before and that was a nice compromise. Too much under-steer in the round-a-boots with zero.
Old 04-02-2019, 06:12 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
95viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 43 Posts
2007 cls550
Agree. Putting in the Mercedes camber / caster bolts will give a fixed adjustment to reduce the negative camber. Needs to be done prior to alignment and costs about $40. Does not allow adjustments like other options but those are $500 and up and don’t come without drama for many.

I put them on mine when my PSS looked exactly the same after 20k miles.

Originally Posted by Jasonoff
It's the combo of toe out AND negative camber with over 25k miles. Looks like normal wear to me with that alignment.

I am currently at 0 toe up front and I think I'll dial in some toe out again. I ran 1/16" total toe out before and that was a nice compromise. Too much under-steer in the round-a-boots with zero.
Old 04-02-2019, 06:23 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,216
Received 1,572 Likes on 925 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by 95viper
Agree. Putting in the Mercedes camber / caster bolts will give a fixed adjustment to reduce the negative camber. Needs to be done prior to alignment and costs about $40. Does not allow adjustments like other options but those are $500 and up and don’t come without drama for many.

I put them on mine when my PSS looked exactly the same after 20k miles.
It's still more caused by the toe out though. Maybe 80:20 ratio so getting rid of the camber won't fix it. Just prolong it a little bit.
Old 04-02-2019, 07:12 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
BLKSHRK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 42
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
C63 AMG
Camber doesn't wear tires at extreme rates. When suspension cycles driving down a road or entering, exiting a corner camber changes.


Imagine rolling a tire down a straight line across a shop floor. This is zero toe, zero camber.

Now tilt that tire (but keep it pointed straight) and ROLL it down that line. This is camber.
Now rotate that tire 1.8 degrees and DRAG it down the same straight line. This is toe


Which one is going to wear the tire more?
Old 04-02-2019, 07:44 PM
  #15  
Member
 
juggernaut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 83
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2010 Ford G6E Turbo / 2013 C63 Coupe - AMG Performance Pack
I just had mine aligned recently when I had new rear tyres fitted. As you can see mine has less toe and less camber. Apparently mine already has the MB camber bolts installed.

​​​​​​​

Last edited by juggernaut1; 04-02-2019 at 07:49 PM.
Old 04-02-2019, 10:52 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 463
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
2014 C63 Coupe
Originally Posted by Jasonoff
It's still more caused by the toe out though. Maybe 80:20 ratio so getting rid of the camber won't fix it. Just prolong it a little bit.

Yes, toe is worse than camber for wear. Not that camber has zero effect, it’s just not the driving force as you understand.

Last edited by Ludedude; 04-02-2019 at 10:56 PM.
Old 04-02-2019, 11:03 PM
  #17  
Member
 
juggernaut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 83
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2010 Ford G6E Turbo / 2013 C63 Coupe - AMG Performance Pack
Originally Posted by BLKSHRK
Camber doesn't wear tires at extreme rates. When suspension cycles driving down a road or entering, exiting a corner camber changes.


Imagine rolling a tire down a straight line across a shop floor. This is zero toe, zero camber.

Now tilt that tire (but keep it pointed straight) and ROLL it down that line. This is camber.
Now rotate that tire 1.8 degrees and DRAG it down the same straight line. This is toe


Which one is going to wear the tire more?
IMO - the toe causes the wear but the camber concentrates that wear as we are seeing here. If there was no camber, in theory toe would cause the wear across the entire width of the tyre.
Old 04-02-2019, 11:43 PM
  #18  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Dogtag114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 918
Received 115 Likes on 70 Posts
2009 c63
Originally Posted by Ludedude
OP: your car has toe in in the rear (some is good for high speed stability) and toe out on one tire and toe in on the other up front.
? I see .13 in front on both sides... where is one in and one out ?
Old 04-03-2019, 12:53 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Ludedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 463
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
2014 C63 Coupe
Originally Posted by Dogtag114
? I see .13 in front on both sides... where is one in and one out ?
I was looking at the before numbers. It looks like you actually have toe out on both. I bet it turns in like a beast on the track.
Old 04-03-2019, 07:35 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vladds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 1,168
Received 126 Likes on 96 Posts
2010 C63 2019 GLA45
I thought 25,000 Miles is good enough for the front tires on this car. With two sets of wheels, this can be good for 5 years, after which the rubber will be too old anyway, considering that when you buy the tires brand new, it's normal for them to be 1-2 years old. By 7 years old, they start to dry rot.
Old 04-03-2019, 08:21 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,216
Received 1,572 Likes on 925 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Ludedude
Yes, toe is worse than camber for wear. Not that camber has zero effect, it’s just not the driving force as you understand.
I understand completely what's happening. The tire is dragging along the road surface while rotating. Since they are pointed out, the inside tread blocks get most of the beating because of the direction the force is applied. Then, the negative camber amplifies it.

If there was 0 camber, the wear would look slightly different and would have lasted longer before wearing through the inside.
The following users liked this post:
Ludedude (04-03-2019)
Old 04-03-2019, 11:52 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Diabolis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,684
Received 761 Likes on 527 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
+1 - all valid points above. As for that particular set, the rubber has completely cracked down to the carcass (which would also indicate that the tires were too old) and those are unsafe.
The following users liked this post:
Ludedude (04-03-2019)
Old 04-12-2019, 08:26 AM
  #23  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Dogtag114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 918
Received 115 Likes on 70 Posts
2009 c63
Originally Posted by Diabolis
+1 - all valid points above. As for that particular set, the rubber has completely cracked down to the carcass (which would also indicate that the tires were too old) and those are unsafe.
yup... unsafe, but threw them on anyway... just to get to my Indy shop... got here fine... phew

we’ll see what the prealignment figures are... may get a quote for pre-emotive headbolt repair too.
Old 09-21-2019, 03:55 AM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
icantthnkof1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E46 M3 - sold 2013 C63 Coupe

Being conscious how low the tread is, I was caressing her trying to stretch as much life out of them as I could before putting her down for most of the winter. I plan on giving her some much needed attention like draining and pumping her with fresh fluids, adding some tasteful implants, and rewire her brain. I wanted to beat on her with a fresh pair of sneaks once the weather broke free.

While it's no excuse, I've worn down many tires well past this point and have never seen, let alone, experienced this. I check the tires just about every day keeping tabs on the condition. There was no warning, other than the warning tabs 😏, all of a sudden I just heard slapping coming from the front left end. When it happened, I remembered having come across this post and it occurred in the same area as yours. Hope it's just a coincidence...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Front Inside Tire Wear... again



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 AM.