Question for my data logging friends
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Question for my data logging friends
Hello All,
This question is directed towards all of my fellow W204 C63 NA owners those who love to log drive data and look at it. I would like to know the following
1. What is the maximum MAF value in g/s have you observed? and at what RPM? It would be closer to red-line but what exact RPM? What was the IAT? and Ambient temp?
2. I understand for those of us who are tuned the commanded throttle at WOT is 100% but have you seen what is the maximum actual throttle opening percentage at WOT?
3. What is your location's nominal atmospheric pressure in KPa? and what is the MAP value at WOT closer to 6000 to 7000 RPM? If it drops, by how much?
Please when reply can you mention your MODS as well if it is not in your signature? I am specifically looking to compare data from people with bigger throttle bodies vs stock? and also between tuners.
Thank you for looking into this. Have a great day and stay safe y'all.
Regards
Jay
This question is directed towards all of my fellow W204 C63 NA owners those who love to log drive data and look at it. I would like to know the following
1. What is the maximum MAF value in g/s have you observed? and at what RPM? It would be closer to red-line but what exact RPM? What was the IAT? and Ambient temp?
2. I understand for those of us who are tuned the commanded throttle at WOT is 100% but have you seen what is the maximum actual throttle opening percentage at WOT?
3. What is your location's nominal atmospheric pressure in KPa? and what is the MAP value at WOT closer to 6000 to 7000 RPM? If it drops, by how much?
Please when reply can you mention your MODS as well if it is not in your signature? I am specifically looking to compare data from people with bigger throttle bodies vs stock? and also between tuners.
Thank you for looking into this. Have a great day and stay safe y'all.
Regards
Jay
Last edited by Jaideep Singh; 07-09-2020 at 02:49 PM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,046
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,665 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
@skratch77 has a ton of airflow data
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-09-2020)
#4
Member
Thread Starter
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Basically just start logging your car and see what you get..
I remember that night i was about to hit 400 g/s when I hit the deer. Crazy I was looking at the log right after lol.
Maybe saw like 6500 rpms so had a little more to go.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
I'll look but unfortunately I have a new cell phone and had those files on it.
Basically just start logging your car and see what you get..
I remember that night i was about to hit 400 g/s when I hit the deer. Crazy I was looking at the log right after lol.
Maybe saw like 6500 rpms so had a little more to go.
Basically just start logging your car and see what you get..
I remember that night i was about to hit 400 g/s when I hit the deer. Crazy I was looking at the log right after lol.
Maybe saw like 6500 rpms so had a little more to go.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Here is a few I found and the last one is on a race file with 30d timing (the pull i hit the deer)
So the best my car was doing was 305g/s at 4800 rpms compared to 260g/s at 4800 rpms on 93 Oct file. If I could of made the last pull all the way I would of broke 400 easily.
So the best my car was doing was 305g/s at 4800 rpms compared to 260g/s at 4800 rpms on 93 Oct file. If I could of made the last pull all the way I would of broke 400 easily.
Last edited by skratch77; 07-09-2020 at 04:06 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-09-2020)
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Here is a few I found and the last one is on a race file with 30d timing (the pull i hit the deer)
So the best my car was doing was 305g/s at 4800 rpms compared to 260g/s at 4800 rpms on 93 Oct file. If I could of made the last pull all the way I would of broke 400 easily.
So the best my car was doing was 305g/s at 4800 rpms compared to 260g/s at 4800 rpms on 93 Oct file. If I could of made the last pull all the way I would of broke 400 easily.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
#10
Member
Thread Starter
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
#12
Member
Thread Starter
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,046
Received 2,811 Likes
on
1,665 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
355g/s is the best I saw with 82’s on a standard EC V5 tune. And my car is known as a strong example.
If you just have an off-the-shelf tune, I’d say you’re spot on.
My EC dyno tune in Oct 2018 changed the power band significantly, and picked up a ton of peak tq/hp. I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m over 400g/s on my race gas file now.
If you just have an off-the-shelf tune, I’d say you’re spot on.
My EC dyno tune in Oct 2018 changed the power band significantly, and picked up a ton of peak tq/hp. I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m over 400g/s on my race gas file now.
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-10-2020)
#14
Member
Thread Starter
355g/s is the best I saw with 82’s on a standard EC V5 tune. And my car is known as a strong example.
If you just have an off-the-shelf tune, I’d say you’re spot on.
My EC dyno tune in Oct 2018 changed the power band significantly, and picked up a ton of peak tq/hp. I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m over 400g/s on my race gas file now.
If you just have an off-the-shelf tune, I’d say you’re spot on.
My EC dyno tune in Oct 2018 changed the power band significantly, and picked up a ton of peak tq/hp. I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m over 400g/s on my race gas file now.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
I also tested in the middle of winter with super cold dense air and no cats.
I had fi headers that are like mbh to 3 in mid section and 3in remus exhaust.
Here is the video showing our tbs open all the way even though it says 87%
I had fi headers that are like mbh to 3 in mid section and 3in remus exhaust.
Here is the video showing our tbs open all the way even though it says 87%
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-10-2020)
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-10-2020)
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm not really sure what the point of this is but maybe i'll log mine lol. What airboxes are you running i'm sure that has an impact. Header design on a N/A motor will also have an impact aswell. Fuel should really make no difference on air. If the throttle is fully open it shouldn't really play a roll. Fuel changes ignition timing, it's not forced induction so you wont see any increase in boost etc...
#22
Member
Thread Starter
I'm not really sure what the point of this is but maybe i'll log mine lol. What airboxes are you running i'm sure that has an impact. Header design on a N/A motor will also have an impact aswell. Fuel should really make no difference on air. If the throttle is fully open it shouldn't really play a roll. Fuel changes ignition timing, it's not forced induction so you wont see any increase in boost etc...
#23
SPONSOR
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes
on
570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
i wouldn't get too caught up in what another brands engine is registering on MAF g/s. i'm sure there is some variation as well as difference as we have 2 MAF's versus 1. also, these aren't lab grade testing devices either.
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Can you share some of your data files if it is okay? What kind of MAP drop do you see closer to redline? I think a DOHC engine should be able to have a higher GF Charge (per intake stroke per cylinder) as compared to a SOHC engine. This is just my thought. I have used GF Charge while we benchmarked engines back in the OEM I was working for. Anyways I would love to see your data as well if possible. Thank you for sharing all the good info on these forums.