C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Question for my data logging friends

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-09-2020, 01:19 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Lightbulb Question for my data logging friends

Hello All,

This question is directed towards all of my fellow W204 C63 NA owners those who love to log drive data and look at it. I would like to know the following

1. What is the maximum MAF value in g/s have you observed? and at what RPM? It would be closer to red-line but what exact RPM? What was the IAT? and Ambient temp?
2. I understand for those of us who are tuned the commanded throttle at WOT is 100% but have you seen what is the maximum actual throttle opening percentage at WOT?
3. What is your location's nominal atmospheric pressure in KPa? and what is the MAP value at WOT closer to 6000 to 7000 RPM? If it drops, by how much?

Please when reply can you mention your MODS as well if it is not in your signature? I am specifically looking to compare data from people with bigger throttle bodies vs stock? and also between tuners.

Thank you for looking into this. Have a great day and stay safe y'all.

Regards
Jay

Last edited by Jaideep Singh; 07-09-2020 at 02:49 PM.
Old 07-09-2020, 01:23 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,046
Received 2,811 Likes on 1,665 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
@skratch77 has a ton of airflow data
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-09-2020)
Old 07-09-2020, 02:26 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by BLKROKT
@skratch77 has a ton of airflow data
Lol last time I was logging i hit a deer.
The following 2 users liked this post by skratch77:
BLKROKT (07-09-2020), hachiroku (07-09-2020)
Old 07-09-2020, 02:27 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by skratch77
Lol last time I was logging i hit a deer.
Damn that's unfortunate. I saw your advice on putting the E63 Y pipe. were you ever able to log some data with it? Do you have any older data files which you can dig?
Old 07-09-2020, 02:31 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Jaideep Singh
Damn that's unfortunate. I saw your advice on putting the E63 Y pipe. were you ever able to log some data with it? Do you have any older data files which you can dig?
I'll look but unfortunately I have a new cell phone and had those files on it.

Basically just start logging your car and see what you get..

I remember that night i was about to hit 400 g/s when I hit the deer. Crazy I was looking at the log right after lol.

Maybe saw like 6500 rpms so had a little more to go.
Old 07-09-2020, 02:48 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by skratch77
I'll look but unfortunately I have a new cell phone and had those files on it.

Basically just start logging your car and see what you get..

I remember that night i was about to hit 400 g/s when I hit the deer. Crazy I was looking at the log right after lol.

Maybe saw like 6500 rpms so had a little more to go.
I have a bunch of data files. I just want to compare it with others. The biggest concern is air charge per cylinder per liter for a 5.7L Hemi which has single overhead cam is higher than our dual over head cam 6.2L which doesn't seem right to me on my car. What data logger were you using? 400g/s seems like a very high airflow which is good. Let me know if you are able to locate those files. Thanks.
Old 07-09-2020, 03:58 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Here is a few I found and the last one is on a race file with 30d timing (the pull i hit the deer)

So the best my car was doing was 305g/s at 4800 rpms compared to 260g/s at 4800 rpms on 93 Oct file. If I could of made the last pull all the way I would of broke 400 easily.



Last edited by skratch77; 07-09-2020 at 04:06 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-09-2020)
Old 07-09-2020, 04:28 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by skratch77
Here is a few I found and the last one is on a race file with 30d timing (the pull i hit the deer)

So the best my car was doing was 305g/s at 4800 rpms compared to 260g/s at 4800 rpms on 93 Oct file. If I could of made the last pull all the way I would of broke 400 easily.

Is this data file after the Y Pipe change? Do you have throttle opening percentage and MAP in the file too?

Old 07-09-2020, 04:53 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Jaideep Singh
Is this data file after the Y Pipe change? Do you have throttle opening percentage and MAP in the file too?
This was 100% throttle and I dont have it after the y pipe as I've changed to many things on the car.

Old 07-09-2020, 05:07 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by skratch77
This was 100% throttle and I dont have it after the y pipe as I've changed to many things on the car.
Thank you for sharing. What I noticed was at WOT my commanded throttle is 100% but actual throttle feedback is 88%.
Old 07-09-2020, 05:31 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Jaideep Singh
Thank you for sharing. What I noticed was at WOT my commanded throttle is 100% but actual throttle feedback is 88%.
Dont worry they open 100% I tested that with my throttle bodies outside the intake manifold
Old 07-09-2020, 07:20 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by skratch77
Dont worry they open 100% I tested that with my throttle bodies outside the intake manifold
Okay that is good to know. Thank you for the information. I appreciate it.

My vehicle’s max air flow is closer to 360g/sec. I am just trying to figure out what might be wrong.
Old 07-09-2020, 07:48 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,046
Received 2,811 Likes on 1,665 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
355g/s is the best I saw with 82’s on a standard EC V5 tune. And my car is known as a strong example.

If you just have an off-the-shelf tune, I’d say you’re spot on.

My EC dyno tune in Oct 2018 changed the power band significantly, and picked up a ton of peak tq/hp. I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m over 400g/s on my race gas file now.
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-10-2020)
Old 07-09-2020, 08:06 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by BLKROKT
355g/s is the best I saw with 82’s on a standard EC V5 tune. And my car is known as a strong example.

If you just have an off-the-shelf tune, I’d say you’re spot on.

My EC dyno tune in Oct 2018 changed the power band significantly, and picked up a ton of peak tq/hp. I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m over 400g/s on my race gas file now.
That’s what my worry is. This 360g/s max is with EC dyno tune on E85. I am just worried why it is so low.
Old 07-09-2020, 08:11 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
I also tested in the middle of winter with super cold dense air and no cats.

I had fi headers that are like mbh to 3 in mid section and 3in remus exhaust.

Here is the video showing our tbs open all the way even though it says 87%

The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-10-2020)
Old 07-09-2020, 08:13 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Jaideep Singh
That’s what my worry is. This 360g/s max is with EC dyno tune on E85. I am just worried why it is so low.
Are you catless?
Old 07-09-2020, 08:13 PM
  #17  
SPONSOR
 
hachiroku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes on 570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
at full sing i'm seeing around 363g/s plus or minus at redline. at times i've hit 379g/s and that region as well.
__________________
-BARRY

​​​Follow us on instagram @eightysixtuned
https://www.eightysixtuned.com

Last edited by hachiroku; 07-09-2020 at 08:43 PM.
Old 07-09-2020, 08:15 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
skratch77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,684
Received 368 Likes on 271 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by hachiroku
at full sing i'm seeing around 363g/s plus or minus at redline.
Now you guys know i was so interested in the velocity stacks. I was trying to hit that 415gs/s
The following users liked this post:
Jaideep Singh (07-10-2020)
Old 07-09-2020, 08:16 PM
  #19  
SPONSOR
 
hachiroku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes on 570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
i'm on 91 octane
__________________
-BARRY

​​​Follow us on instagram @eightysixtuned
https://www.eightysixtuned.com
Old 07-09-2020, 08:28 PM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by skratch77
Are you catless?
Yes catless with X pipe stock resonator and mufflers
Old 07-10-2020, 12:26 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,095
Received 286 Likes on 184 Posts
10 C six trizzle
I'm not really sure what the point of this is but maybe i'll log mine lol. What airboxes are you running i'm sure that has an impact. Header design on a N/A motor will also have an impact aswell. Fuel should really make no difference on air. If the throttle is fully open it shouldn't really play a roll. Fuel changes ignition timing, it's not forced induction so you wont see any increase in boost etc...
Old 07-10-2020, 12:55 AM
  #22  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by roadtalontsi
I'm not really sure what the point of this is but maybe i'll log mine lol. What airboxes are you running i'm sure that has an impact. Header design on a N/A motor will also have an impact aswell. Fuel should really make no difference on air. If the throttle is fully open it shouldn't really play a roll. Fuel changes ignition timing, it's not forced induction so you wont see any increase in boost etc...
My objective is to understand if my cam timing is set right and VEs are good. My plan is to understand the bottle neck of air path and work on improving it. My car’s peak I saw today was closer to 366g/s. I never thought 400+ would be possible but people are getting it. I am using ROW Air box and LTH. What Kind of MAF you see up today and what MAP drop?
Old 07-10-2020, 04:38 PM
  #23  
SPONSOR
 
hachiroku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes on 570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
i wouldn't get too caught up in what another brands engine is registering on MAF g/s. i'm sure there is some variation as well as difference as we have 2 MAF's versus 1. also, these aren't lab grade testing devices either.
__________________
-BARRY

​​​Follow us on instagram @eightysixtuned
https://www.eightysixtuned.com
Old 07-10-2020, 04:47 PM
  #24  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jaideep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ANN ARBOR
Posts: 122
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by hachiroku
i wouldn't get too caught up in what another brands engine is registering on MAF g/s. i'm sure there is some variation as well as difference as we have 2 MAF's versus 1. also, these aren't lab grade testing devices either.
Can you share some of your data files if it is okay? What kind of MAP drop do you see closer to redline? I think a DOHC engine should be able to have a higher GF Charge (per intake stroke per cylinder) as compared to a SOHC engine. This is just my thought. I have used GF Charge while we benchmarked engines back in the OEM I was working for. Anyways I would love to see your data as well if possible. Thank you for sharing all the good info on these forums.
Old 07-10-2020, 05:24 PM
  #25  
SPONSOR
 
hachiroku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 3,627
Received 797 Likes on 570 Posts
2007 Mercedes E63 AMG
DOHC and SOHC will not matter if the camshaft is comparable in terms of powerband.
__________________
-BARRY

​​​Follow us on instagram @eightysixtuned
https://www.eightysixtuned.com


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Question for my data logging friends



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.