New C63 S AMG Owner (Coming from a C43 - a fake AMG?)
Last edited by Stevestil; Mar 3, 2020 at 02:39 PM.
Mercedes is absolutely capable of making great cars without AMG. The cars listed above are, in fact, incredible cars and a great value for the money. Anyone buying them is getting a great car from Mercedes without paying the AMG tax. Anyone attempting to argue that the cars are **** is just childish.
Remember, our cars are the lowest "real" AMGs. No need to put someone down for their choice of purchase. The whole buying new vs used argument is stupid. I personally like having a brand new car, so I got the c63s. If I were buying used I would be in an e63s right now.
There also has to be a way to agree on what makes a "real" AMG. It can't be 'how it drives' as thats subjective. It can't be whether or not it has the badge, as anyone can throw a badge on anything.
I think the most logical way to determine whether or not a car is an AMG is based on who built the engine. If it was AMG, then its an AMG. It's a car after all, the engine is a pretty important part of it.
But not anymore. Nowadays for marketing, the manufacturers have diluted these brands with cars that are not the highest levels of performance. That is why you get so many 63 and full-M owners saying "not a real ____." These diluted cars are not the best each class has to offer and don't live up to the spirit in which these performance divisions were founded.
Saying "I drive an AMG/M/RS" used to mean something serious. You shelled out to drive the best possible C/E/S/etc. that Mercedes had to offer. Now you have a bunch of 43 owners saying "Yeah I drive an AMG!!" Did they really expect the 63 guys to welcome them with open arms?
Also, don't even try with the whole "oh so you only buy cars for the badge?" against this. Nobody buys cars while disregarding brand cachet.
But not anymore. Nowadays for marketing, the manufacturers have diluted these brands with cars that are not the highest levels of performance. That is why you get so many 63 and full-M owners saying "not a real ____." These diluted cars are not the best each class has to offer and don't live up to the spirit in which these performance divisions were founded.
Saying "I drive an AMG/M/RS" used to mean something serious. You shelled out to drive the best possible C/E/S/etc. that Mercedes had to offer. Now you have a bunch of 43 owners saying "Yeah I drive an AMG!!" Did they really expect the 63 guys to welcome them with open arms?
Also, don't even try with the whole "oh so you only buy cars for the badge?" against this. Nobody buys cars while disregarding brand cachet.
As I mentioned above, prior to that, I had a 63 for 5 years and loved it. In terms of outright raw performance (braking, handling, power, etc.), 63 wins hands down.
In terms of everyday usability? It's a toss-up/personal preference at that point. With where I live, I really love the AWD during this time of year when it's alternating between rain and snow every day. No getting caught between summer/winter tires. Can use the power every day on virtually every road.
Before I got my LCI 63, I was a BMW guy. There was a flock of BMW M guys that laughed at the pre-LCI - called it a re-badged Mercedes taxi with a hot rod motor (was constantly getting spanked in comparison tests and on the track by the E90 M3). This game has been happening since the beginning of time lol. It's not until the LCI W204 C63 that AMG started really focusing handling, kinematics, etc.
Have always owned Porsche and BMW until December of last year when I purchased a 2019 C43. Always thought most car douches were Porsche owners.
Prior to reading this thread, I was considering debadging the car as a matter of course. However, after being entertained by such fragile egos such as yours, I will leave the car as-is.
Just curious, are you over 70? You seem like an angry old man.
Last edited by ///zhp04; Mar 7, 2020 at 03:52 PM.
Last edited by Klinh; Mar 7, 2020 at 04:23 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My argument would be that a car guy is not defined by the price or the model of the car he owns. In a more realistic definition of a car guy, he is the one who does a ground-up restoration on his 1967 Austin Healey or tracks his Mazda Miata. Never been to a car guy gathering where owners are bashing other owners and their cars!
Anyone can buy a high-end techmobile and then brag about it. This thread appears to be an outlet for many real AMG owners whose motives are just that.
Apparently many egos are threatened by the existence of the C43? That I don't get.
Despite having a FL C63s me and the wife drive, we both have an older car that we use. Mine is a 2003, and I actually quite like it!
It's not all about having the latest and greatest.
Have always owned Porsche and BMW until December of last year when I purchased a 2019 C43. Always thought most car douches were Porsche owners.
Prior to reading this thread, I was considering debadging the car as a matter of course. However, after being entertained by such fragile egos such as yours, I will leave the car as-is.
Just curious, are you over 70? You seem like an angry old man.
There’s the C43 model which is labeled as AMG by Mercedes but it’s really not a true AMG. I think lot of car guys knows this, they buy them because it fits their needs better. There are people that buy the C43 (or any other sub AMG model) just because of the AMG label.
Then there’s the true AMG. Lots of people buy it because it’s the AMG car, could be the V8, or the total sum of changes. You still have people buying the true AMG just because it’s the most expensive model within the series but they have no clue what they just bought. These people won’t even go full WOT because they think they’ll hurt the car, wtf? Yes I’ve met those people.









