C63/C63S AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Whos Going Porsche after C63/S Ownership

Old May 27, 2021 | 12:32 PM
  #1  
FromV4_to_C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 429
Likes: 78
2021 AMG C63 Coupe
Whos Going Porsche after C63/S Ownership

My ownership Journey started 3 years ago.
When I pulled the trigger on the 2021 C63 in 2021
I could have walked into a 992 2020

Obviously I picked the C63 lol.
Wondering for those who are new Sports/Super car enthusiast whats next for you...

My ownership chain will look like such C63 >> Porsche >>> Mclaren 570s or Lambo H 580
I have seen good deals on the 570s. 992 C4 hovers around 120K for a few thousand more you can grab a Mclaren 570s




Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
boosted20v's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 336
Likes: 97
From: Houston, TX
2020 AMG GT63s
I was getting ready to pull the trigger on an AMG GTS before going with the c63 (couldn't get my wife over only having 2 seats). GTC or R is next for me without a doubt.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 02:49 PM
  #3  
mstraka's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 307
Likes: 74
From: New Orleans. LA
amg C63s
I am but I'm waiting for car prices to stabilize. Low mileage cars one or two years old are currently selling close to MSRP! I'm waiting for dealers to rebuild their new car inventory so used car prices come down. I'm thinking Carrera S as I want to avoid the center lock wheel issue on a GTS. Love my AMG 63s but too many cars, too little time. I'm 70.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 02:53 PM
  #4  
tobeit's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 424
From: Florida
AMG C63s
that's the plan/idea (but I change my mind frequently) ...911 Turbo or Taycan Turbo
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 04:59 PM
  #5  
AlexZTuned's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 372
From: Austin, TX
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Already did. 2017 911 C4 with 24k miles and a warranty. Loaded with front axle lift, PDK, a Escort 360 CI (integrated into the smoker tray), and 100% full PPF. Purchased for less than what I bought my C63S Coupe for new back in 2016.

View this post on Instagram
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 05:16 PM
  #6  
FromV4_to_C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 429
Likes: 78
2021 AMG C63 Coupe
The 911 is clean bro!
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 05:47 PM
  #7  
hyperion667's Avatar
MBWorld God!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 31,277
Likes: 3,916
From: on my way
2012 CLS63
Originally Posted by tobeit
that's the plan/idea (but I change my mind frequently) ...911 Turbo or Taycan Turbo
A well optioned 911TT is over 250 K these days
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 06:39 PM
  #8  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,467
Likes: 5,356
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
So Porsche for me is an interesting dilemma. They are continuously praised for their handling and dynamism, but at the same time are described as clinical by more and more people. For example the PDK has become so good, that it is unrewarding. It shifts too smoothly for a performance car. To be honest, the only Porsches that interest me are the GT models, but they are not very good everyday cars. They also still have some of the rawness I seek and the PDK is better in them. Some of the models can still be had with manual transmissions, so that would be another option. But quite honestly, I think Porsche is somewhat overrated and definitely overpriced unless you find a good deal in the used market. Their design hasn't much evolved over time, and they have had one idea, placing the engine in the rear and stuck with it doing everything possible to overcome the inherent disadvantage of place the engine back there. Not to mention the sheer overload of different 911 variants. But, now that MB, BMW and Audi have all discontinued their European Delivery programs and what's coming out of AMG next isn't exactly my cup of tea, Porsche might end up being my next choice. I like that they are not messing with their core lineup at least for now and instead are working on a fully electric lineup and the Taycan is a great start.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 27, 2021 | 06:47 PM
  #9  
hyperion667's Avatar
MBWorld God!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 31,277
Likes: 3,916
From: on my way
2012 CLS63
Originally Posted by superswiss
So Porsche for me is an interesting dilemma. They are continuously praised for their handling and dynamism, but at the same time are described as clinical by more and more people. For example the PDK has become so good, that it is unrewarding. It shifts too smoothly for a performance car. To be honest, the only Porsches that interest me are the GT models, but they are not very good everyday cars. They also still have some of the rawness I seek and the PDK is better in them. Some of the models can still be had with manual transmissions, so that would be another option. But quite honestly, I think Porsche is somewhat overrated and definitely overpriced unless you find a good deal in the used market. Their design hasn't much evolved over time, and they have had one idea, placing the engine in the rear and stuck with it doing everything possible to overcome the inherent disadvantage of place the engine back there. Not to mention the sheer overload of different 911 variants. But, now that MB, BMW and Audi have all discontinued their European Delivery programs and what's coming out of AMG next isn't exactly my cup of tea, Porsche might end up being my next choice. I like that they are not messing with their core lineup at least for now and instead are working on a fully electric lineup and the Taycan is a great start.
I've owned a couple: albeit they were 997's and older models. The pricing has evolved that's for sure. They have always been very good at charging for the MANY options they offer.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 07:04 PM
  #10  
mstraka's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 307
Likes: 74
From: New Orleans. LA
amg C63s
Originally Posted by superswiss
So Porsche for me is an interesting dilemma. They are continuously praised for their handling and dynamism, but at the same time are described as clinical by more and more people. For example the PDK has become so good, that it is unrewarding. It shifts too smoothly for a performance car. To be honest, the only Porsches that interest me are the GT models, but they are not very good everyday cars. They also still have some of the rawness I seek and the PDK is better in them. Some of the models can still be had with manual transmissions, so that would be another option. But quite honestly, I think Porsche is somewhat overrated and definitely overpriced unless you find a good deal in the used market. Their design hasn't much evolved over time, and they have had one idea, placing the engine in the rear and stuck with it doing everything possible to overcome the inherent disadvantage of place the engine back there. Not to mention the sheer overload of different 911 variants. But, now that MB, BMW and Audi have all discontinued their European Delivery programs and what's coming out of AMG next isn't exactly my cup of tea, Porsche might end up being my next choice. I like that they are not messing with their core lineup at least for now and instead are working on a fully electric lineup and the Taycan is a great start.
A recent news event was the research Porsche is doing in the possible manufacturing of a 'gasoline' that is nearly emission free. Success in this venture would mean that the internal combustion engine may still be here in the future. This seems to say that Porsche is committed to the ICE driving experience. This kind of Porsche commitment would win my commitment to Porsche. Yes overpriced but this is the price of the Porsche driving experience. It's based upon tradition, never losing sight of the original concept that has evolved through the years.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 07:40 PM
  #11  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,467
Likes: 5,356
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by mstraka
A recent news event was the research Porsche is doing in the possible manufacturing of a 'gasoline' that is nearly emission free. Success in this venture would mean that the internal combustion engine may still be here in the future. This seems to say that Porsche is committed to the ICE driving experience. This kind of Porsche commitment would win my commitment to Porsche. Yes overpriced but this is the price of the Porsche driving experience. It's based upon tradition, never losing sight of the original concept that has evolved through the years.
Yes, I'm aware of the eFuel research, but I'm not keeping my hopes up for now. The issue with eFuel is the energy it takes to make a gallon of the stuff and how little you get back out of it due to the low efficiency of a combustion engine. It only makes sense to produce eFuel with excess electricity that you'd otherwise have to burn off somewhere, but even so it's a terribly inefficient storage medium and it makes more sense to store the excess electricity in a more efficient medium to charge batteries with it later. It might become something for the enthusiast to run their classic cars periodically at $20/gallon or something like that. We'll see where it goes.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 09:34 PM
  #12  
wings02's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 342
Likes: 91
From: Florida
GLE400, 2017 Porsche 911S
I came out of a 2017 911S. I have had two other 911's but the 2017 was the first with turbos. It was a game changer IMO, offering high torque off the line that was never before possible until you were at 3,000 rpm's. Porsche has always evolved with refinements and handling. My 2017 was more nimble than my 2013. The 2017 had the handling characteristics more like the 2016 Cayman GTS I briefly had. After driving a 911, all other front engine cars feel heavy and not as compliant. THAT BEING SAID, I was ready for a more comfortable "GT" ride. So far, my C63s Cabriolet is giving me that. No, it does not handle like a 911 or feel as nimble, but in certain ways, I am finding it more enjoyable and fun to drive, especially when it comes to entering and exiting the car. Better on my 64 y.o. back.
BUT, nothing is like a 911 in many ways and all sports cars enthusiasts owe it to themselves to own one if financially possible. Just do it when you're a little younger
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 09:45 PM
  #13  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,467
Likes: 5,356
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by wings02
I came out of a 2017 911S. I have had two other 911's but the 2017 was the first with turbos. It was a game changer IMO, offering high torque off the line that was never before possible until you were at 3,000 rpm's. Porsche has always evolved with refinements and handling. My 2017 was more nimble than my 2013. The 2017 had the handling characteristics more like the 2016 Cayman GTS I briefly had. After driving a 911, all other front engine cars feel heavy and not as compliant. THAT BEING SAID, I was ready for a more comfortable "GT" ride. So far, my C63s Cabriolet is giving me that. No, it does not handle like a 911 or feel as nimble, but in certain ways, I am finding it more enjoyable and fun to drive, especially when it comes to entering and exiting the car. Better on my 64 y.o. back.
BUT, nothing is like a 911 in many ways and all sports cars enthusiasts owe it to themselves to own one if financially possible. Just do it when you're a little younger
Not saying the C63 handles as good as the 911, but in all fairness the convertible is the worst of the bunch. Over 200lbs heavier than the coupe it's based on and losing a bunch of rigidity in the process. More of a Boulevard cruiser than a canyon carver.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 10:00 PM
  #14  
///Bruce's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 315
From: Pearland, Tx
2020 AMG GTC Coupe & 2018 Macan Turbo
You mean like this?
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 11:05 PM
  #15  
AlexZTuned's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 372
From: Austin, TX
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by superswiss
So Porsche for me is an interesting dilemma. They are continuously praised for their handling and dynamism, but at the same time are described as clinical by more and more people. For example the PDK has become so good, that it is unrewarding. It shifts too smoothly for a performance car. To be honest, the only Porsches that interest me are the GT models, but they are not very good everyday cars. They also still have some of the rawness I seek and the PDK is better in them. Some of the models can still be had with manual transmissions, so that would be another option. But quite honestly, I think Porsche is somewhat overrated and definitely overpriced unless you find a good deal in the used market. Their design hasn't much evolved over time, and they have had one idea, placing the engine in the rear and stuck with it doing everything possible to overcome the inherent disadvantage of place the engine back there. Not to mention the sheer overload of different 911 variants. But, now that MB, BMW and Audi have all discontinued their European Delivery programs and what's coming out of AMG next isn't exactly my cup of tea, Porsche might end up being my next choice. I like that they are not messing with their core lineup at least for now and instead are working on a fully electric lineup and the Taycan is a great start.
So you think having an engine over the front axles and RWD is the ideal set up? Ideally, you want weight over the rear tires for traction and weight distribution - either with mid-engine (or front mid-engine like an AMG GT) or rear engine which seems to have worked quite well for 911’s over the last half century considering they beat just about anything out there in their class.

Don’t get me wrong, front engine, RWD cars are tons of fun but have completely different driving dynamics. Once you reach a certain power level, you simply can’t manage all that power to the rear wheels. You need downforce or weight over the rear tires for grip, so it’s inherently at a disadvantage for handling and traction.

I will say that the PDK in my 991.2 is the best transmission I’ve ever had. I drove manuals for 15 years. Getting the C63S in an auto was a hard thing for me to get over, but it worked. The PDK can’t even be compared, it’s definitely smooth when you want it to be, but put it in Sport+ and it will slam your head against the seat when you pull the paddle under wide open throttle. Clinical? Definitely not. Precise and able to place the car whenever you want with extreme confidence? Absolutely.

The only thing my C63S Coupe had over the 911 was the sound. But a set of cat bypass pipes and an exhaust solves that easily.
Reply
Old May 27, 2021 | 11:18 PM
  #16  
AlexZTuned's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 372
From: Austin, TX
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by ///Bruce
You mean like this?
Very nice

Picked up a Macan S for my wife - it’s an incredible thing to drive (how does it handle so well?) and having a dual clutch in it makes it so much fun and engaging compared to others in its class with slushboxes and ZF 8-speeds.



Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 12:40 AM
  #17  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,467
Likes: 5,356
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
So you think having an engine over the front axles and RWD is the ideal set up? Ideally, you want weight over the rear tires for traction and weight distribution - either with mid-engine (or front mid-engine like an AMG GT) or rear engine which seems to have worked quite well for 911’s over the last half century considering they beat just about anything out there in their class.

Don’t get me wrong, front engine, RWD cars are tons of fun but have completely different driving dynamics. Once you reach a certain power level, you simply can’t manage all that power to the rear wheels. You need downforce or weight over the rear tires for grip, so it’s inherently at a disadvantage for handling and traction.

I will say that the PDK in my 991.2 is the best transmission I’ve ever had. I drove manuals for 15 years. Getting the C63S in an auto was a hard thing for me to get over, but it worked. The PDK can’t even be compared, it’s definitely smooth when you want it to be, but put it in Sport+ and it will slam your head against the seat when you pull the paddle under wide open throttle. Clinical? Definitely not. Precise and able to place the car whenever you want with extreme confidence? Absolutely.

The only thing my C63S Coupe had over the 911 was the sound. But a set of cat bypass pipes and an exhaust solves that easily.
No it's not the ideal setup, but it has its advantages. Ideal would be rear mid engine. Yes, 911s are unbeatable when it comes to traction, but they also had problems in the past to hook the front, because of not enough weight there. Going to a double-wishbone suspension in the new GT3 did wonders. I guess when it comes to the 911, I'm kinda with Jeremy Clarkson on the subject.
Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 08:28 AM
  #18  
AlexZTuned's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 372
From: Austin, TX
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by superswiss
No it's not the ideal setup, but it has its advantages. Ideal would be rear mid engine. Yes, 911s are unbeatable when it comes to traction, but they also had problems in the past to hook the front, because of not enough weight there. Going to a double-wishbone suspension in the new GT3 did wonders. I guess when it comes to the 911, I'm kinda with Jeremy Clarkson on the subject.
Clarkson also called the W204 C63 “an axe murderer with headlights” - and I can get behind that too. He’s a sensationalist, for good reason.

However, I take the opinion of Chris Harris when it comes to the 911.
Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 12:49 PM
  #19  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,467
Likes: 5,356
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
Clarkson also called the W204 C63 “an axe murderer with headlights” - and I can get behind that too. He’s a sensationalist, for good reason.

However, I take the opinion of Chris Harris when it comes to the 911.
I do like Chris Harris, but I also think he's a bit of a fanboy when it comes to the 911. Nothing wrong with that. We all have our preferences. If I boil it down at the end of the day it comes down to the car I buy needs to be useable for me. I don't have much interest in a car that only works for some occasions. I don't see the 911 as a replacement for the C63. The C63 is a GT. Classic front engine, RWD, useable rear seats at least for shorter distances and trunk for the luggage and gear when going on a grand tour. Technically, the 911 is a GT as well, but it's really more sports car than GT. The rear seats are pointless and room for cargo is limited. For example the kind of ED trip I did with the C63 would be very difficult with the 911. Driving around Europe for 2 months with two suitcases and friends and family in the car would not be doable in a 911. I could see it as a weekend car in addition to the C63. So I guess it comes down to if you want a GT or a sports car.
Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 12:59 PM
  #20  
FromV4_to_C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 429
Likes: 78
2021 AMG C63 Coupe
All great view points , and yes it boils down to what you want.
Me personally , I think I should have gone with the S now ....."shaking my head" oh well .. The next Coupe will make up for it.

With that said , I will jump to a AMG GT , 992 C or Mclaren 570s
Wife has the SUV for Family needs and trips. [Paid off]
The daily will stay something hybrid {Paid off]

My weekend Coupe will all-ways be a upper end 2 door coupe with nothing less than 200 MPH on the dash.

Last edited by FromV4_to_C63; May 28, 2021 at 01:04 PM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 02:05 PM
  #21  
wings02's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 342
Likes: 91
From: Florida
GLE400, 2017 Porsche 911S
The biggest advantage that the back seats have in the 911 is for insurance rates. Cheaper with a four-seater configuration.
Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 02:27 PM
  #22  
Seis-Tres's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 40
Likes: 33
C63S


I call them Hans and Franz. They're so different from each other but they compliment each other very well.
Old May 28, 2021 | 05:29 PM
  #23  
AlexZTuned's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 372
From: Austin, TX
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by wings02
The biggest advantage that the back seats have in the 911 is for insurance rates. Cheaper with a four-seater configuration.
My insurance rates dropped when I moved into a 991.2 from the C63S Coupe. Both are 2017 models and the 911 I bought was optioned out to nearly 120k when new.

I found the C63S Coupe, while somewhat practical, is not something that is comfortable for 4 adults to ride in for any extended period of time. The Coupe is a GT car, but a very unpractical one if you’re hauling people in the back seats on the daily. The sedan makes the most sense, but I’ve never liked the way it looked - it’s just incredibly boring looking to me.

The 911 rear seats are ideal for young kids, a dog, or just throwing crap in the back because it allows for a ton of storage (in addition to having the frunk storage). If you’re 5’ 5” and under, you are good to sit back there. The 911 also has a much more compliant ride than the Coupe, and I’m actually more comfortable in it than the AMG which was on the harsher side.
Reply
Old May 28, 2021 | 05:51 PM
  #24  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,467
Likes: 5,356
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by AlexZTuned
My insurance rates dropped when I moved into a 991.2 from the C63S Coupe. Both are 2017 models and the 911 I bought was optioned out to nearly 120k when new.

I found the C63S Coupe, while somewhat practical, is not something that is comfortable for 4 adults to ride in for any extended period of time. The Coupe is a GT car, but a very unpractical one if you’re hauling people in the back seats on the daily. The sedan makes the most sense, but I’ve never liked the way it looked - it’s just incredibly boring looking to me.

The 911 rear seats are ideal for young kids, a dog, or just throwing crap in the back because it allows for a ton of storage (in addition to having the frunk storage). If you’re 5’ 5” and under, you are good to sit back there. The 911 also has a much more compliant ride than the Coupe, and I’m actually more comfortable in it than the AMG which was on the harsher side.
Right, the C63S Coupe is a 2+2 GT. The backseats are meant to carry passengers for short distances at your destination, but the longer journey you do by yourself or with your significant other, but you can fit full size adults back there. Just not meant to be comfortable for longer distances. For longer distance journeys with 3+ adults that's where the GT63 would come in. Typical example, I drove from Germany by myself with luggage to Switzerland over country roads to visit my parents after picking the car up in Sindelfingen. In Switzerland we did all the local driving in my car. My 75 year old dad sat in the back and my mom in the front. These were drives up to about 1.5 hours. No problem whatsoever and they are not small people. So basically the idea is to be able to bring some people along for local driving, either at home or at your destination and for that it works perfectly well as designed.
Reply
Old May 29, 2021 | 09:47 AM
  #25  
FromV4_to_C63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 429
Likes: 78
2021 AMG C63 Coupe
Driving in the french Alps , killer photos of Hans and Franz .... Great info to boot!

I have finally created a thread were information is great and we are all enjoying the community
Did I mention I should have purchased the "S'

You Guys&Gals have safe weekend , se ya on the beach
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.

story-0
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's new electric GT 4-Door Coupe trades combustion for software, synthetic noise, and more than 1,100 horsepower.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 20:08:15


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-2
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-5
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-6
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-9
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE