Rear main seal leak impacting all M177 motors?
Last edited by rdj1947; Jan 29, 2024 at 08:16 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
You are not alone with being treated like this: https://mbworld.org/forums/coupe-roa...-no-gt-me.html
While doing research it seems the E63s owners have started to complain about the rear main seal leaking as well as oil separators failing causing repairs that cost well into the thousands and weeks in the shop. The issue comes up on low to mid mileage cars.
I did some digging and saw the same trend among G63 owners along with people in some threads saying it’s an M177 problem in general and MB hasn’t done a recall.
Has anyone on here had any rear main seal problems? How costly/time consuming is the fix?
At this point I’m concerned the issue could impact my car too. Thanks
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...-rms-leak.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w213-amg/...lift-e63s.html




There isn't much of a workload the oil separator does, but if it gets clogged, then the pressure builds up and eventually causes the rear main seal to fail. I don't think it has been revealed what specifically causes it to clog up in the affected engines, but doing more frequent oil changes can't hurt to keep the oil as clean as possible. Also, driving style probably plays a role. The vehicles where it mainly seems to happen, the E63 and G63, tend to not be flogged around very much due to the kind of customer that buys them. They end up being used as commuter cars mostly with the engine diddling around at low rpms. There's something to be said about the good old Italian tuneup. These engines are built to be driven hard, so redline them frequently to blow the gunk out. As I keep saying, a redline a day keeps the mechanic away :-).
Also, frequent short distance driving isn't good for any modern engine. Make sure that the engine always properly reaches operating temperature for a long period to run optimally. With the kind of driving people do in the USA, such as driving as little as a mile to the grocery store and back to their house, sitting hours in stop&go traffic etc. isn't really all that good for these engines. Consider an electric car for the daily grunt and reserve these phenomenal cars for proper driving.
Last edited by superswiss; Sep 28, 2024 at 02:53 PM.
It blocks particle and droplet flow and causes vapor condensation via impingement by virtue of droplet contact with separator geometry inside the separator labyrinth.
There is a thermodynamic effect of condensation as hot vapor exits the crankcase and travels through the comparatively cooler vapor tubes and into the separator chamber, then back into the, again comparatively cooler, intake duct.
Car companies are tying to solve a multi-science problem with crappy cheap plastic tubes and a cheap blow molded catch bottle - the separator itself.
Last edited by chassis; Sep 29, 2024 at 09:49 AM.
Can cans need to be periodically emptied, or plumbed into the intake or crankcase. Re-entry into the engine is the problem with MB's solution. The OVS system is a flow-through design which gets clogged because of MB's usual engineering failures. Aftermarket catch can mitigates intake valve deposits and only partially addresses clogging. In the scenario where the user fails to empty the catch can or the aftermarket components are blocked, clogging can result.
Assuming a catch can does not clog and the user empties it periodically, pressure/vacuum balance in the crankcase needs to be assured. Modern engines have far more crankcase vacuum than in the old days, for the purpose of capturing vapors and reducing indirect (non-tailpipe) emissions. Severing the factory OVS system by installing an aftermarket catch can changes the crankcase ventilation balance. Risk is excess pressure or excess vacuum in the crankcase which can compromise engine gaskets and seals.
Using an aftermarket solution is not worth it in my view, to try to re-engineer a complex system that a car company has already failed to solve.
Last edited by chassis; Sep 29, 2024 at 09:57 AM.








If curious just search the web for 63 motorsports, they might be a sponsor on mbworld too.
2018 c63s coupe owner here,
Did a little digging, these are the changes between the M177 (LS1) and M177 (LS2) engines. The M177 (LS2) engine was used in the 213 E63’s W423 G63’s and W222 S63’s.
The oil separator was adjusted in the LS2, I’m certain us 205’s will not have this issue unless you’re unlucky.
https://wright-company.net/wp-conten...017/02/E63.pdf




2018 c63s coupe owner here,
Did a little digging, these are the changes between the M177 (LS1) and M177 (LS2) engines. The M177 (LS2) engine was used in the 213 E63’s W423 G63’s and W222 S63’s.
The oil separator was adjusted in the LS2, I’m certain us 205’s will not have this issue unless you’re unlucky.
https://wright-company.net/wp-conten...017/02/E63.pdf
I brought the car in because the heat wasn’t working, and the service dept. convinced me to do spark plugs at 45k miles.
When they did the plugs, they found oil leaking from the head gasket, oil separators failed, and rear main seal failed.
All replaced, without removing the engine (looks like they took the transmission out from the bottom to get at the RMS).
anyway I’m in a W222, but it’s the S560. So I think these oil separators are just a bad design it seems. Both of mine were failed.
Guess I need to budget $10k in 5 years time to do this again out of warranty.








